Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rook's Tour

  • 07-11-2007 1:03am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭


    Right, I'm stuck on a problem which I won't get a solution to for a week. The damn thing's going to be stuck in my head until I get a solution, and I have better things to do this week.

    Here's where YOU come in. Let's see if you can't help me with my sums, Hrrgh?

    Consider an 8x8 chessboard and a piece, R, that starts at the lowest left square and takes a tour of the board, visiting each square, never visiting a square twice, and ending up at the starting square. Each move goes from a square to an adjacent square in either the horizontal or vertical direction. Thus the tour requires 64 moves. Is it possible that in such a tour R takes the same number of horizontal moves as vertical ones?

    I've managed to find a path such that the horizontal and vertical moves differ by two, but I'm stuck now. I'm starting to think it's not possible.

    This is Stan Wagon's current 'problem of the week'. Archives here:

    http://mathforum.org/wagon/


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭ZorbaTehZ


    Is it not 65 moves since it returns to the original square?

    EDIT: It is 64, nevermind me. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    Right, I'm stuck on a problem which I won't get a solution to for a week.

    I got the solution, it's "No", it's not possible. The irritating part is that there was no proof provided.

    Grr :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭ZorbaTehZ


    I can't find the problem on that page, could you link it? Or are you just using the mailing lists?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    Yeah, mailing lists. It'll be on there in a week or so


Advertisement