Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

California Shots [C&C Welcome]

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    Some nice shots, first one reminds me of sitting on the dock of the bay. I wouldnt be mad on the black and white conversion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Let me guess, you're using a Canon IXUS 75? ;)

    For the first shot perhaps shifting the seagull of centre would result in a better shot as I found the background more interesting. The seagull would compliment the scenary rather than be the focal point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    Is that San Diego?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,424 ✭✭✭440Hz


    I like the second one, a stronger conversion might have worked better though, would be interesting to see the colour version of this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭Stephen P


    Nice shots. I'd also like to see the colour version of both shots


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,448 ✭✭✭Josey Wales


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    Let me guess, you're using a Canon IXUS 75? ;)

    How did you know?
    Ibid wrote: »
    Is that San Diego?
    No, the first one is of Stearn's Wharf in Santa Barbara. The second photo is of the financial district in San Francisco.
    440Hz wrote: »
    I like the second one, a stronger conversion might have worked better though, would be interesting to see the colour version of this?

    Unfortunately, I don't think I have a colour version of the photo. I set the camera to B&W for taking the shot. I had read somewhere that doing this rather than changing the colour in post editing would give a better result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    How did you know?
    ...
    Unfortunately, I don't think I have a colour version of the photo. I set the camera to B&W for taking the shot. I had read somewhere that doing this rather than changing the colour in post editing would give a better result.

    I'm magically psychic :D (hint: look at a programme called iExif by Panda) - integrates into firefox and explorer. Here's some of the info that your photo contains ;)

    Make = Canon
    Model = Canon DIGITAL IXUS 75
    Orientation = top/left
    X Resolution = 180
    Y Resolution = 180
    Resolution Unit = inch
    Date Time = 2007-10-05 00:20:35 - Is your camera's clock wrong? Or did you really take the picture at midnight?!?
    YCbCr Positioning = centered
    Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 196

    Exposure Time = 1/500"
    F Number = F4.9
    ISO Speed Ratings = 80
    Exif Version = Version 2.2
    Date Time Original = 2007-10-05 00:20:35
    Date Time Digitized = 2007-10-05 00:20:35
    Components Configuration = YCbcr
    Compressed Bits Per Pixel = 5
    Shutter Speed Value = 8.97 TV
    Aperture Value = 4.59 AV
    Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
    Max Aperture Value = F4.91
    Metering Mode = Pattern
    Flash = Flash did not fire, auto mode
    Focal Length = 17.4mm
    Maker Note = 2380 Byte
    User Comment =
    Flashpix Version = Version 1.0
    Color Space = sRGB
    Exif Image Width = 2592
    Exif Image Height = 1944
    Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 3334
    Focal Plane X Resolution = 11520
    Focal Plane Y Resolution = 11502.959
    Focal Plane Resolution Unit = inch
    Sensing Method = One-chip color area sensor
    File Source = DSC
    Custom Rendered = Normal process
    Exposure Mode = Auto exposure
    White Balance = Manual white balance
    Digital Zoom Ratio = 1x
    Scene Capture Type = Normal






    It is always better to convert in post-processing (if you have good software). The in-camera engine doesn't give you any control on what comes out. Even Picasa has a more powerful B&W converter. But it does take a little more time...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,448 ✭✭✭Josey Wales


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    Date Time = 2007-10-05 00:20:35 - Is your camera's clock wrong? Or did you really take the picture at midnight?!?

    I noticed later on that I had not changed the date and time on the camera to the local US time. Also thanks for the tip on post processing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    No problems - when it comes to taking photographs I think it's very important to have the image in your head before taking the photo. (Not that I do it often enough myself :D) randomly snapping things can sometimes get you great, on the spot shots but a carefully planned shot will more likely deliver better results.

    Shots aren't bad for a first try :) Keep on shooting!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭City-Exile


    It would help if you kept the pier straight in the first one.
    The sun is too strong in the second one, & you don't get enough contrast in the buildings. You'd have been better off with the sun behind you.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭Fenster


    You wouldn't get a photo in San Diego right now for all of the smoke. :[


Advertisement