Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Can someone explain to me (earth's core)

  • 14-10-2007 3:59pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 68 ✭✭


    Can someone explain to me why if the core of the earth is at an extremely high temperature why the heat hasn't radiated out from the core to the surface of the earth and resulted in a fairly uniformal temperature throughout the earth. As I underdtand it there is no energy being created at the centre of the earth so given the age of the earth one would have expected the heat to become more uniformally distributed by conduction?


Comments

  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,760 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    As I underdtand it there is no energy being created at the centre of the earth so given the age of the earth one would have expected the heat to become more uniformally distributed by conduction?

    There is heat being released by radioactive decay.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭Gurgle


    Can someone explain to me why if the core of the earth is at an extremely high temperature why the heat hasn't radiated out from the core to the surface of the earth and resulted in a fairly uniformal temperature throughout the earth. As I underdtand it there is no energy being created at the centre of the earth so given the age of the earth one would have expected the heat to become more uniformally distributed by conduction?

    The earth's crust is a very thick and effective insulator. The core is slowly cooling, with heat being lost to the surface through hot springs, volcanic eruptions etc, but there is more or less no conduction through the crust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭ian_m


    I believe it may be due to resistance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 188 ✭✭onechewy


    Well, without the heat of the sun, surely the surface temp of the whole of the earth be uniform - relative to the thickness of the crust.

    Say, if the sun didn't provide us with heat, any two points on the earth where the earths crust is the same, would have the same surface temp?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 intrigued


    well the primary source of heat in the earths core is the radioactive decay of uranium and radium.I would guess that the reason why the crust is not heated by the core is due to discontinuities(different mediums,= of different densities within the earth), the outer core may act as an insulator too. Then again what about geothermal heat?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    intrigued wrote: »
    Then again what about geothermal heat?
    That's convected


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 intrigued


    ha ha yeah i only thought about that afted i put up the reply :p maybe the cores heat is what makes convection currents or else their is a whole other heat source in the mantle :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 12barblues


    I'm dragging this thread up, but i've been thinking about this recently and searched on the science forum on here and found this so here goes:

    The core of the earth is extremely hot. As hot as the surface of the sun according to some articles I've seen. How is this? the two main the arguments seem to be:

    heat left over from the formation of the planet
    radioactive decay of certain elements in the outer layers of the core (the innermost layer of which is assumed to be molten Iron)

    Well, here's the reason I'm posting. I read somewhere that it's entirely possible that the core of the earth is, in fact, a nuclear fission reactor. this explains a few things:

    1) the heat
    2) the source of the earths magnetic field (if i get any replies to this I'll post up some links to some articles). the current argument is based on convection currents in the molten metal, but there's a good argument against this. (more later)

    it seems very possible to me that this is the case, evidence of nautral fission reactors have been found on earth before in Oklo in Gabon,

    wadda you think?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭fox65


    Could you post up the articles, i'd love to read them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 12barblues


    here's a few to start:

    http://geology.about.com/od/wildgeotheories/a/nuclearcore.htm
    http://www.pnas.org/content/98/20/11085.full
    http://www.nuclearplanet.com/Herndon's%20Nuclear%20Georeactor.html

    look up oklo aswell. the whole thing really makes sense. the second nuclear bomb the dropped on japan used an explosive charge to compress a subcritical pile of atoms into a critical pile. if there's fissile material at the core of the earth, then with the pressures down there.....


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    Another cause of the heat in the earth's core is friction caused by earth's orbit of the sun. The tilting and spinning puts energy in the core.

    I think the only way of telling if a planet has a molten core is by setting off an explosion on it's surface and then measuring the echos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭ch750536


    ^this. There are a number of sources of heat in the core, they all play a part. Look at IO for reference on how much heat can be indirectly caused by gravity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,616 ✭✭✭FISMA


    Can someone explain to me why if the core of the earth is at an extremely high temperature why the heat hasn't radiated out ...

    It took science a while to figure out what heat was.

    For a while, we believed that heat was a material that flowed mechanically from hot to cold. This material was believed to be a fluid and was called the Caloric.

    Later on we discovered heat to be immaterial. Heat is just energy in motion.

    Heat flows slowwwwwwwly. Hence, it takes a while to get from the inside out.


Advertisement