lots of ladies - 2 hands

bops

EDIT: Wrong place me asleep move tks!

these have been on my mind for the last few days, both live 1/2 games - my image is super aggro loosey goosey as per usual.

Hand 1:

I'm the SB - 7 handed, The BB is playing 85 and has declared that she wants to go home and give me her remaining stack

A couple of limpers and I make it 51 (yes that's 51!!) to go with QQ
The BB folds coz she decided not to go bust with 6 high or something, but i get called by the button - his range here is AQ+ 88+ he's taggy enough but will gamble sometimes - he's playing 300 and i cover

Flop: (106) KQJr

I check, expecting him to fire, but he doesn't

Turn: T :mad: :mad: :mad:

I check and he bets 75

well AI/fold??


Hand 2:

Playing 3 handed, villain is good player, good reading skills, bit of a station against me coz he knows my game!! he's playing 500 and i cover

He makes it 17 on the button and i reraise it to 52 from the SB with QQ
He calls

Flop: (102) QQ6r (hello there!!)

check check

Turn: 9

i lead out for 50??

cheers
bops

ianmc38

hand 1. call reassess river assuming he wont fire 2 barrels without the nuts. also bet the flop.

hand 2. bet flop.

BigCityBanker

1. fold

2. maybe bet a little less

LuckyLloyd

This post has been deleted.

bops

LuckyLloyd wrote:

Bops, as far as I am aware - you are known as the biggest rock in the South East. Therefore, why post a hand history where you are flat out lying about the table conditions from the very start?

Your meta - game posts are quite a waste of time tbh.

LOL!!

edit: are you really being serious????

LuckyLloyd

This post has been deleted.

Van Dice

ianmc38 wrote:

hand 1. call reassess river assuming he wont fire 2 barrels without the nuts. also bet the flop.

hand 2. bet flop.

yep.

preflop in hand 1 is a bit excessive too

Mr.Plough

if lloyds right, thats some job of creating a maniac image

bops

yep - i'm a nit - my PF range is QQ+ as you can see from both hands above

mdwexford

Hand 1) What Ian Said

Hand 2) Fine, id check that flop sometimes

I can confirm Lloyd is right, i have logged a lot of playing time with Bops and he plays nothing like he posts, quite the opposite in fact. Nit.

LuckyLloyd

This post has been deleted.

dannydiamond

i play regularly live with bops and his play is"loosey goosey"aggro in general,also i was at this table and i can assure you lloyd he has not lied about the table conditions.i would agree though that he is a nit,donkey,dirty fish etc etc......;) as fo bops being the "biggest rock in the south east" well just lol

cooker3

Mr.Plough wrote:

if lloyds right, thats some job of creating a maniac image

It's the new in thing on boards to create image of a mega donk. Mrflash has brought it to a whole new level

rogue trader

Hi Ian,

Hand 1, Why did't you bet the flop? If your image is aggro and you don't bet a flop like that - that's a bit smelly.
As played i might struggle to fold this but i'm a station.

Hand 2, I'm guessing he folded your turn bet.
I think leading the flop looks less likely that you have a Q. You might even induce a reraise given your image.

As played, i would check the turn, hoping he bets or catches up on the river.

BobSloane

Yeah if your image is super aggro loosey goosey why the hell dont you bet these flops?
Hand 1 you raise 25xbb pre-flop and expect someone else to bet the flop for you...?wtf. On the turn you're wondering if you should go all-in or fold? Again wtf?

hand 2. Well you know he doesn't have a queen. But he might have a pocket pair or feel that a call on the flop would represent a queen. I would bet the flop and check the turn here rather than the other way around.

Do you normally continuation bet - or only when you have nothing?

Mr.Plough

cooker3 wrote:

It's the new in thing on boards to create image of a mega donk. Mrflash has brought it to a whole new level

he doesn't even exist either.

LuckyLloyd

This post has been deleted.

Lemegeton

1st hand. should have bet the flop. looking for the check raise with a set is ok but given his call pre-flop i would have to consider his range includes hands with an ace so you cannot give him a free card with that flop. checking the turn is horrible also, if you make a small bet on the turn and he calls or re-raises you know where you stand, whereas a check on the turn gives him an opening to represent the straight so you have an even tougher decision to make than if you had acted first.

2nd hand.

i would check the turn and then bet the same amount on the river. i want to give him a free card to give him a chance to make some kind of hand to call a bet with on the river. you cant lose the hands with quads so you should be thinking about extracting the most amount of chips you can from him

Van Dice

Lemegeton wrote:

1st hand. should have bet the flop. looking for the check raise with a set is ok but given his call pre-flop i would have to consider his range includes hands with an ace so you cannot give him a free card with that flop. checking the turn is horrible also, if you make a small bet on the turn and he calls or re-raises you know where you stand, whereas a check on the turn gives him an opening to represent the straight so you have an even tougher decision to make than if you had acted first.

2nd hand.

i would check the turn and then bet the same amount on the river. i want to give him a free card to give him a chance to make some kind of hand to call a bet with on the river. you cant lose the hands with quads so you should be thinking about extracting the most amount of chips you can from him

You are like the opposite me in poker

Tar.Aldarion

1 bet flop, call or fold atm.
2 bet flop

bops

H1: I folded & he shows TT (hence his check behind on the flop) - bet the flop man!!

H2: His 1st instinct was to raise, but he folded a small PP - bet the flop!!

thanks all (except clueless lloyd )