Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

First wedding

  • 16-09-2007 7:46pm
    #1
    Fenster
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭


    It was fun, if a long drive.

    1393457886_8b4e130bb7_b.jpg

    1394998668_b0d4942b2b_b.jpg

    1394273625_e840837a40_b.jpg


Comments

  • #2
    Sebzy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭Sebzy


    Nice photo and bride.


  • #3
    Cabaal
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,536 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Sebzy wrote:
    Nice photo and bride.

    Agreed lovely looking sky,
    I've always thought there's alot of good chances for nice shots in Red Rock Park and the body of water around Hoover dam.

    Where was this taken in Nevada?


  • #4
    Paulw
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Beautiful photo. I'm sujre you made them so happy with great photos.


  • #5
    isadub
    Closed Accounts Posts: 63 ✭✭isadub


    Well done...

    1. Fantastic photo anyway, but
    2. you got the detail in her dress which a lot of 'wedding' photog's forget to do...


  • #6
    Fenster
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭Fenster


    We shot at Sand Hollow State Park in St. George, Utah.

    I was the second shooter, with a brief to capture the bride and groom.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Ruu_Old
    Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    Good to see the feet disappear from the photo, it was the only thing distracting. :) Nicely captured.


  • #8
    Jesus Wept
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Fastastic shot!


  • #9
    drive3331
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭drive3331


    Feet included or not its one hell of a nice photo. Very nice work!


  • #10
    hmboards
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 345 ✭✭hmboards


    Very nice. Can't have been easy in what seems to have been strong sunlight. Did you use fill flash ?


  • #11
    Cabaal
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,536 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Ruu wrote:
    Good to see the feet disappear from the photo, it was the only thing distracting. :) Nicely captured.


    Agreed, it looks much better now there gone.

    Sand Hallow looks pretty nice, don;'t know if I'd travel that far though..when I first was over I went here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Powell


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    AnCatDubh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,393 ✭✭✭AnCatDubh


    lovely pic. i think if i may say, much nicer than the original that you posted on the thread previously. the original one had that unflattering angle that seems to draw those behind the camera to it (including myself) but generally doesn't work. But i think the one you have now is great.

    Only suggestion to improve and it is minor - to clone out the railings to the mid-right hand side of the shot.

    Was there a natural shadow falling at the location - i'm just curious as you didn't get any squints and given the general brightness which is evident in your image, i think you've done a great job in positioning *your* bride.

    Good luck.


  • #13
    Hugh_C
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    Looks like Kate from Lost in the 3rd photo. Not a bad thing ...

    :)


  • #14
    AnCatDubh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,393 ✭✭✭AnCatDubh


    AnCatDubh wrote:
    lovely pic. i think if i may say, much nicer than the original that you posted on the thread previously. the original one had that unflattering angle that seems to draw those behind the camera to it (including myself) but generally doesn't work. But i think the one you have now is great.

    Only suggestion to improve and it is minor - to clone out the railings to the mid-right hand side of the shot.

    Good luck.

    Sorry - not sure whats happening my system at the moment, numbers 1 and 2 hadn't shown up on my display first time around. So the above cloning comment refers to number 3. The unflattering angle refers to 1 although on second glance its not as severe as could have been. Number 2 is quite nice also.


  • #15
    Fenster
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭Fenster


    I put the other two photos up before I went to bed last night, which explains that.

    There was absolutely no shade: Man-made lake or not, it was still the middle of the desert. As it is, I got a sun burn on the side of my face not covered by a camera.

    EDIT: It was a picnic table, and it's already fixed.


Advertisement