Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

(Spoiler Warning - UFC 75) Mike'bullsh1t' bisping

  • 08-09-2007 9:10pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 345 ✭✭


    Should have been in the topic title but
    SPOILER WARNING!

    Is it just me or was Matt Hamil robbed? Bisping was convincingly bet over 3 rounds and got a split descition!! That was bullsh1t


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    i would of called it a draw-but if made to call i'd go with hamill alright, thats not bispings fault though..

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 345 ✭✭Drunkmonkey79


    Not his fault but still a rubbish result!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    Maybe should have put a spoiler warning in the title. BTW I agree with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,045 ✭✭✭Vince135792003


    I felt sorry for Matt Hamill. I guess I can see the argument for giving Bisping the last 2 rounds but the decision felt like a "homer" to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭lafors


    Should have been in the topic title but
    SPOILER WARNING!

    Is it just me or was Matt Hamil robbed? Bisping was convincingly bet over 3 rounds and got a split descition!! That was bullsh1t
    Draw. Hamill well won the first round. Draw second (can see how he could have been given the second). Bisping the third easily.

    I haven't a clue how one ref gave it 30-27 to hamill.....what the hell was he watching.

    I wasn't happy with bisping after either, the way he said hamill go back to you wrestling....not needed, especially since hamil was good in defeat.

    Just watched the whole thing on UFC on demand....in work, so couldn't have an beers during it :(


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 345 ✭✭Drunkmonkey79


    [QUOTE=laforsJust watched the whole thing on UFC on demand....in work, so couldn't have an beers during it :([/QUOTE]
    Don't worry had more then enough for the both of us


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭Magic Eight Ball


    Hamill was robbed, Bisping knew he was losing after the second round. well anoyed at that result!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭lafors


    Don't worry had more then enough for the both of us

    I think I'll get drunk in the morning, so I think I'm watching it for the first time :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭JohnMc1


    lafors wrote:
    I wasn't happy with bisping after either, the way he said hamill go back to you wrestling....not needed, especially since hamil was good in defeat.

    That was an asshole thing for him to say. Especially since he got an early Christmas gift with that win. I like Bisping but Hamill got robbed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭goo


    The difference between what each ref had it as was mad.
    Hamill was robbed in my opinion. What Bisping said was dodgy, but we really can't judge fighters by how they act right after fights. Unless they're lovely, in which case they're lovely.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭lafors


    goo wrote:
    The difference between what each ref had it as was mad.
    Hamill was robbed in my opinion. What Bisping said was dodgy, but we really can't judge fighters by how they act right after fights. Unless they're lovely, in which case they're lovely.

    I met Bisping when it was on in belfast and chatted to him for a good while, genuine good guy, thats why I was annoyed by his comment after the match. He beat him, so he should be a better winner, he should have put it behind him, then, if hamil talks sh*t again, fair enough, come out and say it then. but hamil was gracious in defeat (from what I could hear of it...no pun intended), so no need for it.

    Anyway will definitely be a rematch sometime.....unless bisping drops to 185 like Rogan kept recommending.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭goo


    I really doubt they'll do a rematch, maybe I'm wrong.
    It was a bit of a shock they booked this in the first place. Maybe if enough people complain about the decision.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 255 ✭✭Scramble


    I don't know if it came across well, but the audience really booed the Bisping / Hamill decision. Even his English fan base were pretty shamefaced about the whole thing, based on the people I talked to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 346 ✭✭LeoGilly


    Ne one know if this is availible online anywhere. There's nothing on dailymotion!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,045 ✭✭✭Vince135792003


    goo wrote:
    I really doubt they'll do a rematch

    There's money in a re-match. They'll do it I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 263 ✭✭filament


    didn't think it was too unfair to be honest, matt had alot of trouble holding mike down and bispings copunter striking was very accurate


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,803 ✭✭✭dunkamania


    Bisping was on the back foot for 3 rounds,straight away giving up Octagon control and aggression.Hamill should get more points for the takedown then Bisping does for standing up,especially since bisping didnt get near a submission.Hamill's striking looked more effective,Bisping didnt look like he hurt him even once.


Advertisement