Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aer Lingus - Belfast

Options
  • 14-08-2007 7:38am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 78,253 ✭✭✭✭


    They actually seem to be opening quite a few routes:

    Belfast Intl to London/Heathrow
    Belfast Intl to Amsterdam
    Belfast Intl to Barcelona
    Belfast Intl to Geneva
    Belfast Intl to Budapest
    Belfast Intl to Rome/DaVinci
    Belfast Intl to Malaga
    Belfast Intl to Faro Algarve

    Unfortunately they seem to think Belfast International is in south county Down. :(


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    Indeed, it's a hub the are opening up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,212 ✭✭✭✭Tom Dunne


    I wonder if Belfast-> Dublin is on the cards (or vice versa).

    Especially for long-haul to the US. Dublin->Belfast->Boston/NY/Chicago?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 65 ✭✭wwhyte


    Victor wrote:
    Unfortunately they seem to think Belfast International is in south county Down. :(

    They're a bit vague about Manchester too...


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,800 ✭✭✭county


    Victor wrote:

    Unfortunately they seem to think Belfast International is in south county Down. :(
    that would be antrim


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,888 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    tom dunne wrote:
    I wonder if Belfast-> Dublin is on the cards (or vice versa).

    Especially for long-haul to the US. Dublin->Belfast->Boston/NY/Chicago?

    It would take longer to get from the front door of the airport to your seat on the aeroplane that it would to drive from Dublin Airport to Belfast.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 78,253 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    I think what they really need is to be able to put more of the larger aircraft into two-leg flights, something like Warsaw-Dublin-Los Angeles. Already some of the flights are marketed like this.

    At the same time, having a short-range, high-capacity aircraft on the London-Dublin route would free up a few slots, without eating into service too much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Slice


    I wonder if Belfast-> Dublin is on the cards (or vice versa).

    Especially for long-haul to the US. Dublin->Belfast->Boston/NY/Chicago?

    Can you imagine the hoopla if people flying from Dublin to the States were expected to stop over in Belfast? They might as well re-instate the Shannon stopover without the pre-flight US Customs clearance


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,253 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    The trick is to do: Shannon-Dublin-North America, Belfast-Dublin-North America or Cork-Dublin-North America. Cork might be manageable if carrying only a partial fuel load. It would mean a longer stop-over in Dublin though, but probably less than a connecting flight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Victor - putting A330s on internal flights is crazy - it will massively increase the cycles and thus decrease the lifespan of the aircraft. With the stopover gone we shouldn't look backwards IMHO.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,576 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    Maybe fly the short legs un pressurised, that would decrease the cycles.

    No..sorry ...that wouldn't work. Forget that.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement