Tevez, the high court, and sheffield

uberwolf · 25-07-2007 11:28pm #1

if the high court rules that Tevez continued to be owned by the third party, as put forward in the high court writ issued will Sheffield have effectively been proved right in their efforts to be reinstated to the premiership, and will it follow that simply if the high court decides on Tevez?

evad_lhorg · 25-07-2007 11:31pm

Sheffield Utd have already told they were right but as west ham had already been punished it couldnt be overturned.

uberwolf · 26-07-2007 8:55am

but if the high court says Kia Joorabchian retained interest, after the Premier League said it was to end, then it's a new offence? Which hadn't been adjudicated on

Mitch Connor · 26-07-2007 8:59am

uberwolf wrote:

but if the high court says Kia Joorabchian retained interest, after the Premier League said it was to end, then it's a new offence? Which hadn't been adjudicated on

The papers today are saying that the PL have told West Ham it is 'unlikely' they would face further punishment should any case go against them.

PHB · 26-07-2007 12:22pm

That's cause, even if they do get told MSI own them, because they acted like they didn't, they can't be done for third party influence.

marco_polo · 26-07-2007 12:46pm

PHB wrote:

That's cause, even if they do get told MSI own them, because they acted like they didn't, they can't be done for third party influence.

And everybody lives happily ever after.

. Even Sheff Utd, who will probably get a big pot of compensation cash for their troubles down the line.

Tevez, the high court, and sheffield

Comments