Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Have the new book finished But need something explained (spoiler warning)

  • 23-07-2007 3:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭


    I thoroughly enjoyed the deathly hallows but I just can’t get my head around one thing. Why exactly did the elder wand claim Harry as his rightful owner? Because he robbed Malfoys other wand??? This is wrecking my head!!!


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    that kinda bugged me too. Malfoy was MEANT to kill Albus, but Snape actually did it, so that was one distorted seeing glass, the other is: you need to KILL the previous owner, Harry, obviously, didn't kill Malfoy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,367 ✭✭✭✭watna


    Because it originally belonged to Dumbledore and Malfoy disarms him on top of the tower in HBP. Then in the malfoy's house after they are kept prisoners Harry disarms Malfoy. Meaning he has defeated him. The wand passes along by defeating the previous owner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,324 ✭✭✭✭Cathmandooo


    Yeah I'm gonna have to read over that part too! Did Harry get the wand when they escaped the room of requirement? if he got it then then he won the wand off draco cos he saved it and saved draco after duelling. I think that's why!

    I have a question also! JK Rowling said that someone old or middle aged discovers their magic near the end of the book! Did i miss that happening? any idea who she might be talking about??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,367 ✭✭✭✭watna


    Harry doesn't get the wand he is just the rightful owner. Voldemort has the wand (stolen from Dumbledore's grave) and when he uses it to try and kill Harry it can't, because it recognises Harry as it's true owner and the wand can't kill it's rightful owner. The spell therefore backfires and that's how Voldemort dies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭friend and foe


    you don't HAVE to kill the previous owner to claim it. you have to defeat them.

    therefore when malfoy disarmed dumbledore, he defeated him, and the elder wand chose draco. snape then killed dumbledore, but dumbledore was no longer master of the elder wand.

    when harry disarmed draco at malfoy manor, he defeated malfoy and the elder wand chose him. voldemort then killed snape believing that as snape had killed dumbledore, he was master of the elder wand but as dumbledore was no longer master of the elder wand, so snape never was, which is why voldemort never was...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    Cathooo wrote:
    I have a question also! JK Rowling said that someone old or middle aged discovers their magic near the end of the book! Did i miss that happening? any idea who she might be talking about??
    maybe it was Trealawney magicing her crystal balls towards the enemy


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    You didn't need to kill the previous owner as Dumbledore beat Grindewald to get it in the first place and he then lived out his years in prison until Voldemort came and finished him off. Draco then dissarmed Dumbledore, but left the wand behind, then Harry dissarmed Draco at hi house when they escaped the dungeon. You didn't actually need to have the wand on you at the time inorder to loose control of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭friend and foe


    although wasn't there a whole part about how grindelwald never had it in the first place??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,324 ✭✭✭✭Cathmandooo


    The Bollox wrote:
    maybe it was Trealawney magicing her crystal balls towards the enemy

    oh yeah cud be her alright! She hasnt exactly shown much magic in the past has she!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    robinph wrote:
    You didn't need to kill the previous owner as Dumbledore beat Grindewald to get it in the first place and he then lived out his years in prison until Voldemort came and finished him off. Draco then dissarmed Dumbledore, but left the wand behind, then Harry dissarmed Draco at hi house when they escaped the dungeon. You didn't actually need to have the wand on you at the time inorder to loose control of it.
    oh... I thought Dumbledore did kill Grindewald. well that clears things up for me anyway


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,367 ✭✭✭✭watna


    although wasn't there a whole part about how grindelwald never had it in the first place??

    I think Grindelwald was lying when he said he had never had it because Lord Voldemort said I can always tell or something. Plus, it was Grindelwald that stole it from Gregorovitch..... Harry sees it when Voldemort is meeting with Gregorovitch. He is the onw with the merry eyes and blond hair that jumped out of the window with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭friend and foe


    yeah i know he steals it, but was he ever the master? or do i remember him stunning gregorovitch before jumping out the window? perhaps if he stuns gregorovitch, he could have become the master, because he wouldn't have become the master just by stealing it...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,367 ✭✭✭✭watna


    Yup, That's my impression of it anyway!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 886 ✭✭✭randomchild


    yeah i know he steals it, but was he ever the master? or do i remember him stunning gregorovitch before jumping out the window? perhaps if he stuns gregorovitch, he could have become the master, because he wouldn't have become the master just by stealing it...

    I think by stealing it, and thus outwitting gregorovitch, he defeated gregorovitch in a way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 225 ✭✭friend and foe


    I think by stealing it, and thus outwitting gregorovitch, he defeated gregorovitch in a way.

    hmm... it's an interesting one alright... i mean, according to the legend, it was originally stolen when the original master fell asleep drunk. it's never implied that the thief actually had to kill him to gain mastership so i suppose it's possible...

    and voldemort, by taking it from dumbledore's grave, never actualy stole it from it's chosen master...

    interesting indeed... i'm gonna go home and read over the parts relating to the elder wand again...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 960 ✭✭✭:|


    hmm... it's an interesting one alright... i mean, according to the legend, it was originally stolen when the original master fell asleep drunk. it's never implied that the thief actually had to kill him to gain mastership so i suppose it's possible...
    .
    AFAIK the thief did kill the original master. I'm pretty sure but not 100%....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭thehomeofDob


    hmm... it's an interesting one alright... i mean, according to the legend, it was originally stolen when the original master fell asleep drunk. it's never implied that the thief actually had to kill him to gain mastership so i suppose it's possible...

    and voldemort, by taking it from dumbledore's grave, never actualy stole it from it's chosen master...

    interesting indeed... i'm gonna go home and read over the parts relating to the elder wand again...

    He was drunk, and had his throat slit :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,287 ✭✭✭thedrowner


    yeah exactly, he had his throat slit

    perhaps the person who discovered their magic was mrs. weasley, although she's always using magic she never really uses it against anyone? maybe jk rowling was talking about somebody coming out of their shell with the magic????? far fetched, i know!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    You can defeat the owner of the wand and take it from them and claim it as spoiles of a duel with out killing the owner.

    That is how he was able to use Malfoys wand.
    Mr Ollivander explained this in the Shell cottage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭funky penguin


    I was convinced Neville was the rightful owner, as he killed Nagini, who had killed Snape. I thought it would have been a great twist instead of the predictable outcome of Harry getting it. Still, he would have died only for it, so all's good etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    for that to have been true it also would have meant that the wand would have worked superbly for Voldy up to the time that Neville killed Nagini...and if you recall that only came about because Voldemorts jinxes were weakened and could not conjure the strength to repel the mob.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,196 ✭✭✭Crumble Froo


    Overheal wrote:
    for that to have been true it also would have meant that the wand would have worked superbly for Voldy up to the time that Neville killed Nagini...and if you recall that only came about because Voldemorts jinxes were weakened and could not conjure the strength to repel the mob.

    he couldnt repel the mob cos harry had died for them, and given them that protection, i thought? the same that his mother had given him? no?

    no, that doesnt make sense, cos voldemort was still able to put spells on harry, just not to touch him physically...

    though at last we know why there was a slight hint of triumph on dumbledore's face when harry told him that voldemort had used his blood and could touch him... id always wondered at that...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    narco wrote:
    he couldnt repel the mob cos harry had died for them, and given them that protection, i thought? the same that his mother had given him? no?

    no, that doesnt make sense, cos voldemort was still able to put spells on harry, just not to touch him physically...

    though at last we know why there was a slight hint of triumph on dumbledore's face when harry told him that voldemort had used his blood and could touch him... id always wondered at that...
    I wondered about this aswell, I think what happened was the spells started off as normal, but had no lasting, or usual effects. i.e. Harry was not harmed by the cruciatus curse when feigning being dead, but he was lifted in the air, and the croud didn't stay muted for long, no matter how many times Voldy put the charm on them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭Hrududu


    I wondered about this aswell, I think what happened was the spells started off as normal, but had no lasting, or usual effects. i.e. Harry was not harmed by the cruciatus curse when feigning being dead, but he was lifted in the air, and the croud didn't stay muted for long, no matter how many times Voldy put the charm on them
    Yeah, I think with the cruciatus curse on Harry, the wand wouldnt do it right because it saw Harry as the rightful owner. Then later on when Voldemort's spell's arent going well its because Harry gave the people a similar type of protection that his mother had given him.

    I think I have the wand stuff straight in my head. Grindlewald stole the wand from Gregorovich and became its master. Dumbledore defeated but did not kill Grindlewald and became the wand's master. Malfoy disarmed Dumbledore and became the wand's master. Then Harry snatched Malfoy's other wand, therefore beating him. So even though neither Malfoy nor Harry had the elder wand, its allegiances switched to Harry at that point.

    When Voldemort AK'd Harry in the woods I took it to mean that he killed the last part of his own soul within Harry. So the elder wand only carried out the charm on the horcrux, and left Harry alive. But then there was that thing where Harry's blood being in Voldemort's veins meant while Voldie was alive Harry couldnt die. So which was it? Did Harry survive the AK because the wand wouldnt kill him or because Lily's protection kept him tethered to live via Voldemort?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    Harry didn't die because the Elder wand wasn't going to kill it's master, Harry lost his mothers protection when Voldy took Harry's blood (afaik anyway)


Advertisement