Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most amazing theorum you've ever seen

  • 13-07-2007 3:23pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭


    The central limit theorum always struck me as amazing. I can remeber a few strange ones from pure maths in college but none well enough to actually quote :-)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭Farouk.Bulsara


    The central limit theorum always struck me as amazing. I can remeber a few strange ones from pure maths in college but none well enough to actually quote :-)

    I prefer the central limit theorEm myself


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,475 ✭✭✭Son Goku


    For the actual theorem itself, the proof that the transcendentals are more numerous than the rational numbers (or even algebraic numbers) or the proof that if two complex functions are equal on a loop they are equal within the loop.
    For the way it's proved, the topological proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Colonel Sanders


    I prefer the central limit theorEm myself

    how witty


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭aequinoctium


    is the main property of this "amazing theorem" that it ironically cannot be seen...

    would someone like to state it clearly?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,475 ✭✭✭Son Goku


    is the main property of this "amazing theorem" that it ironically cannot be seen...
    :confused:
    would someone like to state it clearly?
    It states that if you have a bunch of probabilistic variables that have a finite variance, then as you increase the number of variables the distribution will look more like the normal distribution.
    It's the central result of probability and explains why the Normal distribtion is so common.

    Wikipedia explains it quite well.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭aequinoctium


    super-duper...

    thanks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭dan719


    Proof of euler idendity e^ipie=-1. I know it is basic but I find it beautiful. Especially with Gauss' comment on it.:D


Advertisement