Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Who would you most like to see Eddie drop?

Options
  • 05-07-2007 12:07pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭


    We all know Eddie has his favourites and many people think his conservative selections will cost Ireland being a world class team. So who would you most like to see him drop?

    Who should Eddie drop? 54 votes

    Peter Stringer
    0% 0 votes
    Girvan Dempsey
    38% 21 votes
    Simon Easterby
    14% 8 votes
    Marcus Horan
    18% 10 votes
    John Hayse
    9% 5 votes
    David Wallace
    1% 1 vote
    Ronan O'Gara
    1% 1 vote
    Denis Hickie
    0% 0 votes
    Donnacha O'Callaghan
    3% 2 votes
    Denis Leamy
    11% 6 votes


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Linford


    How about "none of the above"?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭quagmire69


    i think easterby should be dropped as his style of play doesnt really suit the irish team (except for lineouts). was very unimpressed with his non show in the only match that mattered this year ( france at croke park ). Not saying he's a bad player, just not good enough. Clearly an eddie fave tho so no chance of him being dropped.

    Neil best is a much better option in my opinion.

    Think heaslip has alot to offer on the international stage but is gonna have to wait till leamy goes off the boil, which is gonna be a long wait i reckon.

    Not a big fan of donnacha or stringer either but nobody better at present. maybe reddan if we get to see more of him in an ireland shirt.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 310 ✭✭maxi-twist


    Stringer,id like to see reddan play more. At least he mixes up play a little. Takes a lot of pressure off the OH in the 22 as he can kick to touch. I dont think ive ever seen stringer kick to touch from the 22,actually the only kick i ever remember him taking was that one that led to the try against munster in the heineken cup 2 years ago.

    Cant believe someone voted girve the swerve,he's had a quality season. Really coming into his game at the right time before the world cup. Who do we have to replace him and his experience? Hardly geordan murphy, maybe in a few years once fitzgerald/kearney get a bit more experience but i certainly wouldnt drop him now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Sandwich


    Stringer without a doubt - its not that anything he does is done badly - its what he doesnt do that really hurts the team.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭Diamondmaker


    Yeah who voted GD? Who else????

    Strings has long been a "bore" , we really need a game breaking SH to push us that extra bit. With ROG as a relatively conservative OH and no where near being dropped I feel we need some more options to be prvided by one of the 2 incumbents.

    However EOS has left it way too late for this to occur in the RWC.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Linford


    Is this going to revert into a Dempsey v Murphy debate and Eaterby v Best debate again, I thought all those argument were settled by the performances of Dempsey and Easterby during this year's six nations.

    Its all very well to say that Stringer should be dropped, but is Reddin really better?? Boss was being mentioned as being a better alternative to Stringer this year but after the France game we saw that Stringer style of play is so important to the Irish team, he may not be perfect, and is certainly not a running scrum-half, but he is the best we have at the moment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    Who voted for david wallace? Don't see that Jennings or Glesson have put up much of a compelling case to be given the no 7 slot. I still think one of them ought to be in the RWC squad though, I may be wrong but I get the impression Eddie is not gonna bring any specialist 7 as cover to the world cup.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭Sangre


    I'd drop Easterby simply because I prefer Neil Best. Great sub to have though.

    Stringer isn't going anywhere until a SH can show they've a distribution even half as quick as him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,660 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Two people voted for Dempsey to be dropped:confused:

    He has put in great displays for Ireland this year. Maybe not the most attack-minded player but brilliant defensively. The fb slot is rightly his.

    Anyway, not much point in Eddie dropping any of those players at this stage.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,939 ✭✭✭mikedragon32


    None of the above.

    Turnstiles Murphy for the chop please.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭jank


    I voted Girven, Murphy is a better full back IMO.
    EOS doesnt use him to the fullest of his ability.

    Stringer is the best we have at the mo and as daveirl said look at the france match and how slow that ball came back from the breakdowns. He may not be a dawson with his running breaks but his passing is the best there is in Ireland at the mo. Bit of a one trick poney but he plays that trick very well and ireland need his quick distribution for their much vaunted backline
    After the WC look at others to prove they can step up


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,963 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    jank wrote:
    I voted Girven, Murphy is a better full back IMO.
    EOS doesnt use him to the fullest of his ability.

    Stringer is the best we have at the mo and as daveirl said look at the france match and how slow that ball came back from the breakdowns. He may not be a dawson with his running breaks but his passing is the best there is in Ireland at the mo. Bit of a one trick poney but he plays that trick very well and ireland need his quick distribution for their much vaunted backline
    After the WC look at others to prove they can step up
    France slowed a lot of our ball down that game, I was at at the match. Also Leamy and Wallace were hanging around the wings in several phases when Ireland needed them to be rucking. This may have been a tactical decision, I assume it was both of those players live for the physical aspects of the game.

    If you want fast ball from the breakdown, it's actually far more to do with your rucking speed when you can make a difference of 2 - 5 seconds. The scrum half pass you will get a difference of between 0.1 - 0.3 seconds. The interpretation of the referee is also a bigger variant than difference in time between a pass of Stringer and Boss / Reddan.

    In fact Ireland usually play poorly when we don't ruck well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭muboop1


    stringer!! no doubt about it! hes just not good enough anymore!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    muboop1 wrote:
    stringer!! no doubt about it! hes just not good enough anymore!

    And who would you replace him with?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 373 ✭✭burnedfaceman


    there is nobody i would want eos to drop rather instead i wish he would utilise his bench in games rather than wait to the last few mins for replacements to make an impact


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭muboop1


    And who would you replace him with?

    i just started a thred about this, i want issac boss, mabey redding...but not stringer...gave my reasons in my thred


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,729 ✭✭✭Pride Fighter


    He should drop none of them, they are all playing well. He should drop Geordan Murphy from the squad as he is useless, poor handling/defence and try one of the younger full backs. Murphy has been useless for us the past two seasons and is not fulfilling his potential.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭siochain


    jank wrote:
    I voted Girven, Murphy is a better full back IMO.
    EOS doesnt use him to the fullest of his ability.


    Girven is better in defence, but murphy is much better going forward.

    Ok he had that shocking missed tackle against france, but the ten minutes he was a blood replacement against Wales he was our game breaker. Had a great game against munster. World class attacking full back, if used right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,987 ✭✭✭✭zAbbo


    siochain wrote:
    Girven is better in defence, but murphy is much better going forward.

    Ok he had that shocking missed tackle against france, but the ten minutes he was a blood replacement against Wales he was our game breaker. Had a great game against munster. World class attacking full back, if used right.
    I'd argue we don't need a world class attacking FB when we have the 4 Leinster lads in front of him.

    What we need is someone who can defend and is capable under the high ball.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭siochain


    zabbo wrote:
    I'd argue we don't need a world class attacking FB when we have the 4 Leinster lads in front of him.

    What we need is someone who can defend and is capable under the high ball.


    murphy is very solid under a high ball.

    Its horses for courses, in some games GD would suit and others Murphy,

    If the Leinster 4 in front are so good and as we have such a good choice of back rowers surely there shouldn't be much to defend !!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Sandwich


    daveirl wrote:
    This post has been deleted.
    If I understand your logic correctly - unless a guy has loads of international caps he shouldnt be picked for his country ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,402 ✭✭✭✭Trojan


    Why isn't POC on this list?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,330 ✭✭✭✭Amz


    I think it's hard to really make a call on players who went to Argentina. It was pretty obvious they were all playing for themselves and a place at the World Cup, rather than in an effort to be a better team. While nobody was spectucular I really don't think any of them could have been when there was an element of selfishness amongst their "team-mates".

    I don't think I'd drop anyone from the list ahove, I think if Malcolm O'Kelly could be back to full fitness I'd have him in ahead of O'Callaghan, with O'Callaghan on the bench.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 142 ✭✭Aldini98


    Horgan must be dropped. Big stocking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭GreenHell


    Esterby probably, but I wouldn't like to see him disappear from the squad. He is a massively solid player but I think we have more dangerous 6's than him. Thats if I had to drop someone.

    Our starting 15 is very solid, be hard to drop anyone. Its just disappointing that we have done little to develop players were we have a depth in talent. Whats going to happen when ROG moves on to greener pastures, or the bull, we have one of the oldest backlines in world rugby..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    Probably Dempsey, safe as houses but predictable, so damn predictable.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    Trojan wrote:
    Why isn't POC on this list?!

    Ah come on now really? You can't be serious.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    GreenHell wrote:
    Esterby probably, but I wouldn't like to see him disappear from the squad. He is a massively solid player but I think we have more dangerous 6's than him. Thats if I had to drop someone.

    Our starting 15 is very solid, be hard to drop anyone. Its just disappointing that we have done little to develop players were we have a depth in talent. Whats going to happen when ROG moves on to greener pastures, or the bull, we have one of the oldest backlines in world rugby..

    I'm not so sure whats underneath the first 15 is quite as strong as we would like to think. The last two years have been about building for the RWC, this has been achieved as we have a strong and settled team now, barring injuries to key players. I believe EOS is not convinced that current backup for some of those key positions is good enough regardless of how much game time they would have gotten up to now.

    Also given the fact that the team were going all out to win the championship over the last while, there were really very few opportunities for experimentation. Next years 6Ns is plenty time to start blooding new players for our assault on RWC 2011.


Advertisement