Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cop flips out on a bunch of skaters

  • 28-06-2007 10:52am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭


    This may have been posted before;

    Click

    imo it's not necessarily police brutality, but shows really really bad police skills. He could have handled the situation so much better.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭shortys94


    Wow, i sued to live in New York and the cops were pretty much 100% zero tolerance but this just takes the cake. I cant believe he was like choking the girl and boy at the same time.

    They look like good skaters too by their teaser.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 757 ✭✭✭FiannaGym.com


    What are you guys talking about?

    What else do you expect in Stalin's USSR?

    Oh yeah.....

    Peace


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭Evolute


    I'm Sorry but did anyone else find that funny?? Honestly i giggled a little at the fact that he arrested them for using their skateboards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭kjt


    Somebody's got to say it... Only in America


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    ehhh no1 seems to be mentioning the fact that they were resisting arrest after breaking the law..................

    granted im sure under normal circumstances they will not arrest me for skateboarding or bmxing but just tell me to move BUT if they want to they have a right to

    i have no problem with skateboarders or anyone else doing there sport of choice as i used to bmx and did my fair share of accidental damage to property myself BUT if a garda tried to arrest me for it firstly i would not resist it and moan about it being a "police state" and secondly if i did resist i would fully expect greater force to be used against me.

    seriously take responsibility for your actions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 302 ✭✭maxitwist


    Ok not that I think you are or anything like that but you sound like such a tool there man!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26 sdLOVE


    the cop was suspended but then got off scott free and i think the kids have been charged.. clearly the cop was in the wrong, maybe not on the first kid cause we cant see that part but after he puts him in cuffs on of the kids says "i just got a pic of a cop choking a kid" the cop runs to arrest him, leaving the other kid on the ground in handcuffs un attended. Im sorry but that is highly illegal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15 Pawsome


    Wow that cops a total dick


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 114 ✭✭Ugly Dead Boy


    Clearly has problems dealing with his hair loss, weight gain, inability to think outside of the box and is probably still struggling with bullying issues!!!
    Land of the free my bollox!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    Having no respect for the law does not promote skateboarding at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 159 ✭✭BENJAMIN61


    gift


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭SuperSean11


    Lol:D If that happened in ireland the garda would be in sh!t


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    video doesn't show what they were upto prior to the cop trying to arrest them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭SuperSean11


    The-Rigger wrote:
    video doesn't show what they were upto prior to the cop trying to arrest them.
    Why what were they doing??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Why what were they doing??

    I don't know, it didn't show. Kind of important though in the context of his reactions. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭SuperSean11


    Well maybe the point is they were doing nothing But i dont think your allowed skate on the path


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 159 ✭✭BENJAMIN61


    Well maybe the point is they were doing nothing But i dont think your allowed skate on the path
    yes you are


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Well maybe the point is they were doing nothing But i dont think your allowed skate on the path

    Well they would want to make that point, and maybe it is the case.

    Maybe it isn't, I didn't see what happened before he started arresting them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭SuperSean11


    We cant realy make a conclusion from here.
    To America:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 159 ✭✭BENJAMIN61


    We cant realy make a conclusion from here.
    To America:rolleyes:
    sean are you american


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    I might be the only one here who didn't make a conclusion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    maxitwist wrote:
    Ok not that I think you are or anything like that but you sound like such a tool there man!

    meh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    Bottom line - the cops are always right.

    Period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭dazftw


    There both wrong tbh.


    In america its illegal to skate down town?

    but what the cop was doing was totally wrong.

    Network with your people: https://www.builtinireland.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 Recon20k


    that guy should not be a cop, i dont think he knew what the £uck he was at. That whole situation got way outta control.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    OMG, The bad policeman expects me to be responsible for my actions and wont let me break the law. That's like totally a police state and stuff.boo hoo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    Bambi wrote:
    OMG, The bad policeman expects me to be responsible for my actions and wont let me break the law. That's like totally a police state and stuff.boo hoo.

    Maybe one day when you've grown up, have a job, pay taxes, have kids, a mortgage etc. you'd hopefully see the bigger picture...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    T-Maxx wrote:
    Maybe one day when you've grown up, have a job, pay taxes, have kids, a mortgage etc. you'd hopefully see the bigger picture...

    he is seeing the bigger picture its called the law


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    PeakOutput wrote:
    he is seeing the bigger picture its called the law

    The actions of one cop do not warrant total anarchy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    T-Maxx wrote:
    The actions of one cop do not warrant total anarchy.

    exactly. are you arguing the same thing I am???

    bambi was being sarcastic. The cop used the force HE felt was necessary to restrain people who did their best to resist arrest. he may have gone overboard but it ensured that the people he wanted to take into custody were taken into custody simple as. a knee on your back does not constitute a rabid blood thirsty police officer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    Are you sure he was being sarcastic? I re-read his post and it still doesn't seem like sarcasm to me though. Maybe it's just me ...:o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 757 ✭✭✭FiannaGym.com


    You guys have a stunningly shallow understanding of policing. Until you have read up on the subject dont you think you should remain quite?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    You guys have a stunningly shallow understanding of policing. Until you have read up on the subject dont you think you should remain quite?

    Ahhhh, why don't you enlighten us with your extensive knowledge then please...:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Indeed but even with this stunningly shallow knowledge of policing we can safely assert the following:

    Flouting laws in front of the police can lead to your arrest. Apparently its a part of their job to arrest people for breaking the law.:confused:

    That, if you will insist on interfering with a nice policeman while he's arresting you friend, he might just arrest you too.

    Although if your some whiny kid from a privilleged background then none of this applies and any attempt to make you accountable for your actions is evidence of a police state.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭griffdaddy


    T-Maxx wrote:
    Bottom line - the cops are always right.

    Period.
    I wouldn't agree with that, go to any district court on a weekday and watch how many cases they fúck up because of improper procedure or misinterpretation of the law.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    griffdaddy wrote:
    I wouldn't agree with that, go to any district court on a weekday and watch how many cases they fúck up because of improper procedure or misinterpretation of the law.

    that does not mean the those defendants should not have been arrested or brought to court it just means they got off on a technicality

    fianna i dont know weather you were refering to the people who were "defending" the cop or calling america a police state but either way BOTH are entitled to air their views on a public forum no matter how "ignorant" of the subject you believe them to be


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 Fri_day




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,209 ✭✭✭T-Maxx


    Bambi wrote:
    Indeed but even with this stunningly shallow knowledge of policing we can safely assert the following:

    Flouting laws in front of the police can lead to your arrest. Apparently its a part of their job to arrest people for breaking the law.:confused:

    That, if you will insist on interfering with a nice policeman while he's arresting you friend, he might just arrest you too.

    Although if your some whiny kid from a privilleged background then none of this applies and any attempt to make you accountable for your actions is evidence of a police state.

    Sarcasm it was then! Sorry for the misinterpretation!:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 757 ✭✭✭FiannaGym.com


    Lex injusta non est lex.

    Basically, in this instance the Police Officer committed greater crimes to enforce lesser ones. While I'm not getting into the whole philosophy of policing in the west I am going to say this. The police officer in question was wreckless, agressive and escalated the situation and lost control of it in so doing.

    Not only did he make the whole situation messy and out of control he also wasted valuable time in the process, thus alienating those children.

    Police are in a position of power, when they loose control of a situation their power is undermined, the whole force and establishment is undermined. Rather than mediating between "criminals", youngsters, the public at large and the community this Police Officer made rash descisions that cause more community divides. Sure he'll keep himself in the job (through increased crime rates) but that is hardly his goal.

    Simply put this is bad police work. Bad police work has as many negative affects as good police work has positive.

    The reason the Police Officer is there in the first place is because kids will be kids, laws are there to assist society remain peacful and safe (depending on your cultural definition of these etc). When those laws conflict with this and could escalate a situation and therefore having a negative effect on society overall those laws should simply be ignored (just like in a demostic dispute).

    Once again, my point is, this is bad police work. Thats from a societal point of view maybe his techniques were well trained etc. But what I saw was chaos induced by the police officers actions. Letting the kids skate down the street, engaging them as a guardian of society the police officer could have said "Hey guys, you know you cant skate here, do me a favour". Or something that would get the point across, bridge the growing gap between police and youth in america, increase the community bonds and basically lead to a calm, peacful community. Rather than the violent chaos in this video.

    Of course it's hard to do, of course its easy to judge from my armchair but that is what we do. And in reviewing in this situation maybe good will come of it. I think this is where the Irish Police Force really excel. In knowing when to follow the letter of the law and when to follow the "spirit" of the law rather than nit pik.

    Peace


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    I think fianna summed the whole affair up quite nicely. The cop could easily just have confiscated their boards, and had the kids pick them up at the station later. That's a quick, clean solution to the problem.

    Instead, he put himself into a position he couldn't back down from without looking weak, and the situation escalated from there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    So when you said people had a shallow understanding of policing what you actually meant was that they had a shallow understanding of what you think policing should be. Im not going to get into the whole policing models argument but suffice to say I pretty much disagree fundamentally with fiannas viewpoint.

    Interestingly enough the kids didnt post the footage of the behaviour that led to the initial arrest. Of course you can make assumptions of how appropriate the cops response was initially but they will only ever be assumptions when you've no idea what occured prior to that.

    Anywhoo, Kiddies made a point of breaking a law as some kind of statement and were duly arrested, on that footage it was their own behaviour that triggered the cops response at every turn after the initial arrest. Hopefully they've now learned a valuable lesson, dont break laws and dont interfere with cops when they're arresting peeples.

    Basically, in this instance the Police Officer committed greater crimes to enforce lesser ones

    Or, on a more basic and accurate level, he didnt commit any crimes. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 757 ✭✭✭FiannaGym.com


    Bambi,

    If the Police Officer was preventing a crime like armed robbery then choking a little girl would not be a crime, however, since she is just a little girl skate boarding he way over shot the mark. As such, assuming this is not a police state, he acted way over what was reasonable. In other words he was excessive.

    Furthermore, if the children are causing public order offences by skate boarding he is causing havoc (not just public disorder) with his actions. He commits the greatest grime of undermining the police, his entire force and the establishment and deepens the divide between the establishment and youth.

    As for me saying people have a shallow understanding, I didnt mean just in my understanding but in the overall complexities of this issue. And your reply pretty much illustrates this.

    For example, you say you fundamentally disagree with my viewpoint of what policing should be, which was? What do I think policing should be? I'm fairly sure my last post didnt say what it should be.

    Do you disagree with me that the police should protect society, invest its limited time wisely rather than recklessly and keep it society peacful and safe?

    Lex injusta non est lex.

    Peace


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭Fozzy


    I can't find the link now, but I was reading earlier that the cop involved in that video was not charged with anything by the police force. Have to say I'm a bit surprised on one hand, but on the other it's not the first story like this that I've heard of


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Bambi,

    If the Police Officer was preventing a crime like armed robbery then choking a little girl would not be a crime, however, since she is just a little girl skate boarding he way over shot the mark.

    Actually, he didnt arrest her for skating, he gave a whole list of reasons for arresting them none of which involved skateboards. Watch the video again.
    I would also assume that you know a decent chokehold when you see one. Did that kid look like she was being choked out?

    Oddly enough, the "he should be out arresting bank robbers" argument is the one used by people who like to break traffic laws in cars. Same difference.
    Furthermore, if the children are causing public order offences by skate boarding he is causing havoc (not just public disorder) with his actions. He commits the greatest grime of undermining the police, his entire force and the establishment and deepens the divide between the establishment and youth.


    Who decides that he undermined the police? You? The media? The people who broke the law? Their Parents? The Duly elected representatives of the voters? The public servants appointed to administer legal matters?

    The police are generally giving discretion in dealing with incidents like this. The police officer in this instance decided not to use it and was found to be justified in that decision through due process. Yet you're second guessing him on the basis of edited footage, which apparently you didnt pay much attention to given that you're under the impression that a young girl was arrested for skateboarding.
    As for me saying people have a shallow understanding, I didnt mean just in my understanding but in the overall complexities of this issue. And your reply pretty much illustrates this.


    Cool argument, I'll use it too. No, YOUR reply illustrates a lack of understanding of the issues the police face in such situations. nyeh. :b.


    Lex injusta non est lex.

    "Just because i dont care doesnt mean I dont understand"
    Homer J Simpson

    Peace


Advertisement