3 full ring hands

NickyOD

Hand 1 and 2 same player. not enough hands on him yet.

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

CO ($195)
Button ($201.95)
SB ($198)
Hero ($196)
UTG ($100.70)
MP ($209.95)

Preflop: Hero is BB with K, Q.
UTG calls $2, MP calls $2, 2 folds, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: ($8) 5, 9, 6(4 players)
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG checks, MP checks.

Turn: ($8) K(4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $6, UTG raises to $26, MP folds, SB folds, Hero ?????

MP1 ($244.85)
MP2 ($158.95)
CO ($207.60)
Button ($197)
Hero ($214)
BB ($69.70)
UTG ($200.65)

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q, T. UTG posts a blind of $2.
4 folds, Hero completes, UTG (poster) raises to $6, Hero calls $2.

Flop: ($10) T, 4, 8(3 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks.

Turn: ($10) Q(3 players)
Hero bets $6, UTG raises to $12, Hero raises to $46, UTG calls $28.

River: ($96) 8(3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets $65, Hero ????

NickyOD

Hand 3. Villain is new to the table.

MP3 ($160.20)
CO ($283.05)
Button ($231.10)
SB ($126.40)
BB ($458.95)
UTG ($48.05)
UTG+1 ($197.15)
Hero ($418.90)
MP2 ($81)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with 8, 7.
2 folds, Hero raises to $8, 4 folds, SB calls $7, 1 fold.

Flop: ($18) 8, 4, 7(2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $12, SB calls $12.

Turn: ($42) 2(2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

River: ($42) J(2 players)
SB bets $40, Hero ????

phantom_lord

reads/stats?

1. fold
2. call
3. fold

TacT

fold 1, little invested and too much heat.

flat call 2 but I would not be happy about it after his min-raise on the turn.

fold 3 since you have no info to go on and wait for someone else to give it to you when they're in a hand with him.

cooker3

To jump on the bandwagon
Fold
Call
Fold

NickyOD

What's he likely to have in hand 1? If hand 1 and hand 2 are the same player is folding hand one really as straghit forward a fold as hand 2 is a straight forward call?

ianmc38

I would fold all of them most of the time. 2 is closer.

cooker3

In hand 1, He has a set a lot here and sometimes a straight, I just don't see anything he can have that you beat with this line bar a bluff and without any stats on him I will just take default line.

Hand 2, he raised it utg instead of limping like hand 1 so this means he has aa/kk a bit here which he decided to "slowplay" on the flop. I think he has them and a busted draw enough to justify the call.

NickyOD

lol! This forum is so full of nits it's getting ridiculous.

Hand I shoved. He folded.
Hand 2 I called. He had KJ
Hand 3 I called he had T-6 of spades.

ianmc38

NickyOD wrote:

lol! This forum is so full of nits it's getting ridiculous.

Hand I shoved. He folded.
Hand 2 I called. He had KJ
Hand 3 I called he had T-6 of spades.

Hand 1 You risked 170 to win 30 odd. You will rarely get called by a worse hand and when you do get called you will usually be drawing dead. You also risked it on a board against an UTG limper who could eaisly have hit the flop really hard and slowplayed. Call me a nit but thats just terrible.

Hand 2 Fine. Definitely the closest of the three.

Hand 3 The only problem is that every single draw has hit by the end. Your line looks like air so calling is fine as your hand is totally underrepresented.

ianmc38

Just saw he had 50xBB in hand 1. Still dont like it.

5starpool

cooker3 wrote:

Hand 2, he raised it utg instead of limping like hand 1 so this means he has aa/kk a bit here which he decided to "slowplay" on the flop. I think he has them and a busted draw enough to justify the call.

If you think he has AA/KK a lot in this hand then it just got there on the river so I presume you are reading the board wrong. I think hand 2 is a relatively straightforward call though as it doesn't really play like either AA/KK.

cooker3

5starpool wrote:

If you think he has AA/KK a lot in this hand then it just got there on the river so I presume you are reading the board wrong. I think hand 2 is a relatively straightforward call though as it doesn't really play like either AA/KK.

Yep, I completely missed that the board paired so ignore what I said

Tar.Aldarion

Fold all three depending on stats.
I might call the third one or second sometimes.

jimmii

Unless they are really tight I don't see why people want to fold these.
Hand 1 I probably would have called then check the river and hope he bluff a little more given his stack size I don't see whats wrong with a push.
Hand 2 Any time I see someone post a blind UTG I mark them as gamblers/idiots so they could have anything, call.
Hand 3 Unless they have 44 I think you are ahead. Doubt they are betting 40 on the river after hitting the flush or straight.
Unless you have solid reads to go against calling I don't see why not to play all of them.

PS I am **** at cash games so that could be why!

fl&sh

NickyOD wrote:

lol! This forum is so full of nits it's getting ridiculous.

Hand I shoved. He folded.
Hand 2 I called. He had KJ
Hand 3 I called he had T-6 of spades.

if someone posts HH here for the purpose of getting some opinions on how they played them or how others would've played them and then proceed to ridicule that response by calling them a "nit" is outrageous.it's no wonder more and more of us beginners aren't posting HH here for fear of that kind of reply,that said,
hand 1 good push
hand 2 good call
hand 3 brave call :cool:

NickyOD

fl&sh wrote:

if someone posts HH here for the purpose of getting some opinions on how they played them or how others would've played them and then proceed to ridicule that response by calling them a "nit" is outrageous

It was a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

but seriously, you're all nits.

Hectorjelly

fl&sh wrote:

if someone posts HH here for the purpose of getting some opinions on how they played them or how others would've played them and then proceed to ridicule that response by calling them a "nit" is outrageous.it's no wonder more and more of us beginners aren't posting HH here for fear of that kind of reply

Calling someone a Nit is hardly outrageous

BuChan

LOL at the nit comment, calm down there fl&sh.

hand one is a pretty insane push. i think i'd have folded there, possibly called.

hand 2 seems like an easy enough call.

hand 3 is a call for me as people don't usually bet pot on the river with the nuts (or nuttly hands).

fl&sh

Hectorjelly wrote:

Calling someone a Nit is hardly outrageous

yes,looking back i'd have to agree with you there. I should have used "scandalous":rolleyes:

Shortstack

NickyOD wrote:

lol! This forum is so full of nits it's getting ridiculous.

Hand I shoved. He folded.
Hand 2 I called. He had KJ
Hand 3 I called he had T-6 of spades.

If that is all you have to say about why you did what you did then this thread should be moved to the badbeat/brag sticky.

Hand 1 you will get stacked a lot for such a small pot

Hand 2 is standard, you are ahead most of the time, expect KQ/AQ shows up a lot here. Obv KK & AA are possibility's and the river counterfeited you.

Hand 3 I think you need some info to make a profitable call, against unknowns a flush or straight is a high possibility. You were lucky he turned out to be a muppet.