Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tender to supply speed cameras out, due July 25

  • 24-06-2007 12:09pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,025 ✭✭✭


    From the Irish times :
    Tenders sought for speed cameras
    Tim O’Brien
    The Garda has circulated its longawaited request for tenders to supply and operate 100 new speed cameras.


    The cameras are to be concentrated on rural or regional roads. Some 60 per cent of fatal crashes and 75 per cent of collisions resulting in serious injury occur on such roads.


    A private company will operate the system, including the processing of fines, but all decisions on where the cameras are sited will be taken by senior gardaí.


    The tender documentation sent to six previously-selected operators late last week does not, however, specify the number or type of cameras required. Instead the Garda has asked for equipment and monitoring services for up to 6,000 hours coverage per month.


    In this way speed cameras at diverse locations will be allocated operational hours as required. Motorists will not know if a speed camera is operational.


    The tender documentation leaves it to the bidding companies to design the camera and back-office systems required.


    However, industry sources said yesterday that the requirements of the tender would appear to indicate that a radar-based system was the desired option.


    Radar-based detection systems were criticised in a report last year by the Comptroller and Auditor General, which highlighted the high number of unusable photographs from fixed speed cameras.


    According to this report, in 2005 some 49 per cent of the 108,331 images taken of speeding cars were unusable. The problems with the system were first identified in 2002.


    However, the Garda documents call for a system which can detect the speed of a vehicle as it approaches or is moving away from the detection equipment.


    The documents also specify that the system should be able to tell the length of a vehicle, important in detecting lorries which are required to travel at lower speeds.


    While there are some inground systems which could meet that specification, the tender documents also specify that roads or lanes may not be closed for maintenance of the system.


    This limits the equipment to a roadside, radar-based system, according to sources.


    While laser-based systems can identify a vehicle among a group of vehicles with pinpoint accuracy, they cannot detect the length of a vehicle.


    The documentation is explicit on its insistence that evidence must be protected and able to withstand challenges in court.


    The date for the submission of completed tenders is July 25th and the cameras are expected to be deployed early next year.


    In addition to the new privatised cameras, the Garda is to buy more than 100 mobile speed cameras for deployment this year.


    A new road safety strategy is also to be launched by Minister for Transport Noel Dempsey early next month.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,906 ✭✭✭jayok


    This is good news. IF - and it's a big if - they are deployed correctly. Anything that reduced road deaths is to be welcomed. However, I fear that they will be deployed in revenue generation spots and not necessarily at the black spots. I know what the article says, but proposal and practice don't always match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Marcus.Aurelius


    More Martin Cullen sponsored horsesh*t. Another money-spinner. Look how well positioned the existing ones are to maximise revenue rather than cut road deaths. Bloody hilarious that people actually believe this sh*t will work. People die by driving badly, less than 40% of accidents list speed as a contributing factor to the severity of the incident, not the cause.

    Anyone who voted the Fianna Failures back in again, well done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,470 ✭✭✭DonJose


    Great news, if you don't break the speed limit then you've nothing to worry/bitch about ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    DonJose wrote:
    Great news, if you don't break the speed limit then you've nothing to worry/bitch about ;)


    but you can drive drunk on the wrong side of the road and have nothing to worry about...

    If you want to cut deaths you need real guards on real checkpoints, not yellow boxes that send you a letter 3 months after the "crime"....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,272 ✭✭✭✭Atomic Pineapple


    also the 80km/h speed limits on some rural/regional roads is a joke, i know of one road that is nice and wide and fairly straight and is an 80km/h speed limit while a parrallel road road that is twisty and bendy and skinny with an accident blackspot is 100km/h, doesnt make any sense at all


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    How are they going to deal with the many constitutional challenges? This move is not going to be implemented unopposed in the courts.


Advertisement