Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Positioning

  • 19-06-2007 8:43pm
    #1
    Hosted Moderators Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭


    On my last test in December which I failed, I got a lot of marks for bad positioning, so was just wondering a few things:

    I think I lost a good few marks on the 'driving between parked cars' bit. When you have cars parked either side of a road, so that there's essentially only one car width to drive in, what's the right procedure?

    I always assumed that the correct place to be is about 2 feet from the left hand side of the road, i.e. just beside but not on top of the double-yellows - is this one right or wrong?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭iconnect


    Red Alert wrote:
    On my last test in December which I failed, I got a lot of marks for bad positioning, so was just wondering a few things:

    I think I lost a good few marks on the 'driving between parked cars' bit. When you have cars parked either side of a road, so that there's essentially only one car width to drive in, what's the right procedure?

    I always assumed that the correct place to be is about 2 feet from the left hand side of the road, i.e. just beside but not on top of the double-yellows - is this one right or wrong?

    The best position when passing parked cars is to allow a car doors width between you and the car on the left.
    If you have cars parked either side and the road is narrow try and leave equal space between cars on both sides and at all times drive at a speed that if a car door did open you could stop safely.

    www.betterdrive.net


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Red Alert wrote:
    When you have cars parked either side of a road... ....I always assumed that the correct place to be is about 2 feet from the left hand side of the road
    If there are cars on both sides of the road, how could you be 2 feet from the edge of the road? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭iconnect


    If there are cars on both sides of the road, how could you be 2 feet from the edge of the road? :confused:

    Wishbone i think the op is talking about when there are no cars with that statement. As Moderator i hope you dont mind me giving advice to people as i am an Instructor for 11 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    iconnect wrote:
    As Moderator i hope you dont mind me giving advice to people as i am an Instructor for 11 years.
    Please feel free. I'll bow to your superior knowledge! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 116 ✭✭Irish Salfordia


    Red Alert wrote:
    On my last test in December which I failed, I got a lot of marks for bad positioning, so was just wondering a few things:

    I think I lost a good few marks on the 'driving between parked cars' bit. When you have cars parked either side of a road, so that there's essentially only one car width to drive in, what's the right procedure?

    I always assumed that the correct place to be is about 2 feet from the left hand side of the road, i.e. just beside but not on top of the double-yellows - is this one right or wrong?
    As others have said if possible try and leave a door's width between you and any parked cars. If you cannot leave this distance - slow down. Also be aware that if there are a number of parked cars with gaps in between, stay out and pass as many as you can in safety. Do not slalom in and out around each car if there is no oncoming traffic necessitating this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    As others have said if possible try and leave a door's width between you and any parked cars. If you cannot leave this distance - slow down. Also be aware that if there are a number of parked cars with gaps in between, stay out and pass as many as you can in safety. Do not slalom in and out around each car if there is no oncoming traffic necessitating this.
    Are you sure?
    Im pretty sure you are supposed to stay in your lane unless you cannot make progress in it.
    Where did you get the "no slalom" bit from?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Macca206


    If theres a large road and despite cars being parked on your side of the road 2 cars can pass then what they are looking for is you to move out and take early position and hold that line as you pass the parked cars. What they dont want is you zig zaggin needlessly in and out of parked cars needlessly.

    However on a normal road with no parked cars you should position to the left of the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Macca206 wrote:
    If theres a large road and despite cars being parked on your side of the road 2 cars can pass then what they are looking for is you to move out and take early position and hold that line as you pass the parked cars. What they dont want is you zig zaggin needlessly in and out of parked cars needlessly.

    However on a normal road with no parked cars you should position to the left of the road.
    ok, but if you are crossing the white line, then what?
    I would say you should move in and out when needed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Macca206


    GreeBo wrote:
    ok, but if you are crossing the white line, then what?
    I would say you should move in and out when needed.

    No if theres room for 2 cars to pass without moving in and out then stay out..it gives oncoming cars additional time to be able to position themselves as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Macca206 wrote:
    No if theres room for 2 cars to pass without moving in and out then stay out..it gives oncoming cars additional time to be able to position themselves as well.
    obviously if you are crossing the white line then there is not room for two cars to pass.
    Irish Salfordia stated that you should always stay out


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Macca206


    GreeBo wrote:
    obviously if you are crossing the white line then there is not room for two cars to pass.

    Says who? I can think of loads of roads that even with cars parked on BOTH sides theres still room for cars on both sides to pass freely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    GreeBo wrote:
    obviously if you are crossing the white line then there is not room for two cars to pass.
    Irish Salfordia stated that you should always stay out
    You should stay out when it is safe to do so. Weaving in and out is pointless. If you stay out you have maximum visibility.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Macca206 wrote:
    Says who? I can think of loads of roads that even with cars parked on BOTH sides theres still room for cars on both sides to pass freely.
    Says me.
    If a road has cars parked on both sides forcing traffic to cross the centreline then there isnt room for two cars to pass each other....at least in my dimension.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    GreeBo wrote:
    Says me.
    If a road has cars parked on both sides forcing traffic to cross the centreline then there isnt room for two cars to pass each other....at least in my dimension.
    There are plently of roads where you can have cars parked on both sides and still have room for two cars to pass each other, whilst staying in their own lane.

    However, there could be very few where two cars could pass whilst leaving an open doors width to the parked car on the same side.

    If I am on one of these roads, and there is nothing coming the other way I will still cross the line, assuming it is safe to do so, and I will stay there until either I have passed all the parked cars or there is another reason for me to return to my own side.

    Being on the offside does not mean instant death, and it is perfectly reasonable to be there.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    MrPudding wrote:
    There are plently of roads where you can have cars parked on both sides and still have room for two cars to pass each other, whilst staying in their own lane.
    Yep, but if you look at my post you will see that I was explicitly asking about situations where you are on the offside.
    If you stay on the offside you could easily get whacked by someone turning left from your right who doesnt look in your direction and is hidden from your view by the parked cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    OK, but if you stay on your own side you could easily get whacked by someone turning right on you side who cuts the corner who you can't see because of the parked cars on your side.

    Seriously, why do you even bother driving if it is so dangerous.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    MrPudding wrote:
    OK, but if you stay on your own side you could easily get whacked by someone turning right on you side who cuts the corner who you can't see because of the parked cars on your side.
    Nope, someone turning right will naturally check oncoming traffic in the lane they are cutting across.
    In my example they other car doesnt check because they dont expect traffic to be driving up the wrong side of the road and they are not crossing any other lane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    OK, I know I have tried to explain stuff like this to you before, but I am a glutton for punishment, so I will try again.

    If you read my post you will find the following:
    MrPudding wrote:
    ....and there is nothing coming the other way I will still cross the line, assuming it is safe to do so,

    ....and I will stay there until either I have passed all the parked cars or there is another reason for me to return to my own side.

    Do you understand what this means? If there was a risk of me being hit by someone turning left it would not be safe to be on the offside, therefore I would not be there. When I ride or drive I do not base my perceived safety for a manoeuvre simply on what I can see, I also base it on what I reckon I cannot see.

    If I believe that there is a junction or entry from which a car could emerge into my path, and I am unable to confirm that it is clear, I will assume that it is not and position myself accordingly in order preserve my bubble of safety and give me the best view possible.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    MrPudding wrote:
    If there was a risk of me being hit by someone turning left it would not be safe to be on the offside, therefore I would not be there. When I ride or drive I do not base my perceived safety for a manoeuvre simply on what I can see, I also base it on what I reckon I cannot see.

    If I believe that there is a junction or entry from which a car could emerge into my path, and I am unable to confirm that it is clear, I will assume that it is not and position myself accordingly in order preserve my bubble of safety and give me the best view possible.

    MrP
    So your idea of staying on the offside only really works on roads that you know, since, by definition you cant see a junction that you cant see.
    I am merely trying to point out that it is safer to spend as little time as possible on the offside.
    If you want to get all agro instead of having a discussion feel free.:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    GreeBo wrote:
    So your idea of staying on the offside only really works on roads that you know, since, by definition you cant see a junction that you cant see.
    I am merely trying to point out that it is safer to spend as little time as possible on the offside.
    If you want to get all agro instead of having a discussion feel free.:confused:
    I am not going all agro. I might be wrong but I am pretty sure we had a discussion before about using the offside, I could do a search but can't be bothered. I do remember getting pretty frustrated about the whole thing back then.

    It is very rarely that there will be a junction that you cannot see. You will notice a gap in the parked cars or the buildings running along the road. You will see lamposts, trees or buildings ahead that are at a right angle to the road you are on. Perhaps you can see a taller vehicle moving at a right angle. Signs for shops or attractions saying "50 metres on right" or normal road directional signs.

    I think it is would be extremely rare that there would be a junction for which there was no hint.

    So, yes, you should spend as little time as possible on the offside but if ti is safe to be there then there is no problem with being there. If you are passing a load of stationary, or even moving traffic, there is little point in constantly moving in and out if the entire manouvre can be completed in one go.

    MrP


  • Advertisement
Advertisement