Groundbreaking New 9/11 Film "September Clues"

CB_Brooklyn

Groundbreaking New 9/11 Film "September Clues" reveals the truth about 9/11.

See September Clues in the following five 10-minute segments:
(more to be made)


http://www.livevideo.com/video/6F393F4DE41C4CF798CBB438E6378129/september-clues-part1.aspx

http://www.livevideo.com/video/2CE2112F00F24F4182C73582D0F89949/september-clues-part2.aspx

http://www.livevideo.com/video/E0E8DC73928D42D4A01CF664B22E16B5/september-clues-part3.aspx

http://www.livevideo.com/video/3F706266A8524D6AA3CCC4CFC2F0F257/september-clues-part4.aspx

http://www.livevideo.com/video/0A68FD7C73F8440E9CDCAE38D86C5129/september-clues-part5.aspx

oscarBravo

Hi there.

Care to comment on my debunking of the "frozen fireball" clip you posted?

bonkey

Care to tell us what's groundbreaking, or what the allegedly revealed truth is?

mike65

Doing some googling for "9/11 second plane" its fun to look at conspiracy sites which show the second plane and they need to show a second plane cos its a military cargo aircraft according to some, while above we have films which suggest there is no second plane. So which it? Which nut job is right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVWfP1uGZr4 my own favourite. Great F/x those boys should get an Oscar.

Mike.

oscarBravo

I'm curious as to why it's only the second plane that's represented as being a special effect (leaving aside the numbers of people who actually saw a plane hit the building. What about the first plane?

I'll reiterate a point I've raised fleetingly before: anyone who has seen the Naudet brothers' documentary 9/11 will be familiar with the scene where the first plane is seen hitting the building. The camera is aimed initially at a group of firefighters, when a low flying jet can be heard. The firefighters notice this, looking puzzled - you never hear low flying jets in Manhatten. They look up, as does the camera, just in time to see the plane hit the building.

For those who believe no planes hit the buildings: what did the firefighters hear? What did they look up at? Who doctored the Naudets' footage afterwards?

mike65

Something that maybe worth considering, are these little films only ever meant to be seen on low-res streaming sites like above? The picture quality is so bad you could suggest any number of things and hope to fool the easily/ willingly fooled.

Mike.

Diogenes

mike65 wrote:

Something that maybe worth considering, are these little films only ever meant to be seen on low-res streaming sites like above? The picture quality is so bad you could suggest any number of things and hope to fool the easily/ willingly fooled.

Mike.

Yes. It does fail to take into account that countless people have access to the footage at full resolution, in newsrooms across the planet.

Jocksereire

i dont agree in no plane theories
i dont agree 911 was not done by yer man in a cave but by the US government.

bonkey

Jocksereire wrote:

i dont agree 911 was not done by yer man in a cave but by the US government.

I'm not trying to be a grammar nazi here, but you appear to be saying you believe Bin Laden was behind it and not the US government.

Alternately, you're missing some punctuation, or mis-phrased what you wanted to say.

Or I'm misremembering your stance on things and you are saying exactly what I said you appear to be saying.

Jocksereire

bonkey wrote:

I'm not trying to be a grammar nazi here, but ......

but but but you still continue to be one

I will reword my statement as it was typed in a rush and i over estimated some peoples ability to decode it. 911 inside job......there happy?