Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Man-made tool or natural?

  • 04-06-2007 7:08pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1


    This object was uncovered about 1 mile inland from Rossnawlagh beach, Donegal. The local geology is dominated by carboniferous limestone and sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. The object was found in context with a smaller triangular stone. Has it been shaped or can natural erosion account for the peculiar shape and very sharp curved point?

    3 pics at: http:// www.TinyURL.com/2ko4fy

    Any ideas?


    spartacus:confused:


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 191 ✭✭maireadmarie


    Hi spartacus - if you send the photos to the National Museum they will be delighted to take a look - but phoning first might be a good idea. I think you may be legally obliged to contact them actually. Those certainly look like important artefacts to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭boneless


    To my (relatively untrained) eye they look natural. I can see no knapping marks as you would see on flint or chert. There might be a percussion mark on the larger one but it is not very clear. There is a possibility that they have been fashioned by abrasion though I have not seen anything like them before in any assemblage of artefacts to date.

    Sorry I couldn't be any clearer than my shilling each way... contact the NMI and ask for the duty archaeologist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭katarin


    boneless wrote:
    To my (relatively untrained) eye they look natural. I can see no knapping marks as you would see on flint or chert.

    i agree, even other shaped stone like quartz would show obvious signs of being tampered with by humans. My guess would be that the stones have been broken naturally, but not recently. the edges don't look sharp enough for it to have been recent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,290 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    In my opinion they are natural. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22 Gnar


    Unfortunatly i think they are natural,i have seen similar objects before and its down to water eroding the object.Just a suggestion but try posting it on th paleontology thread ,to me the large one looks like fossilised Corpolite/dung


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 Millucc


    Natural.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 lpool1


    IMO natural


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 328 ✭✭Fletch123


    You guys do realise that this was posted over a year and half ago. I'd say it's been dealt with now.



    *sorry just hate old posts being dragged up!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Excellent point


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement