Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

'$100 laptop' sparks war of words

  • 21-05-2007 2:02pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,212 ✭✭✭✭


    Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6675833.stm
    '$100 laptop' sparks war of words
    Chip-maker Intel "should be ashamed of itself" for efforts to undermine the $100 laptop initiative, according to its founder Nicholas Negroponte.
    He accused Intel of selling its own cut-price laptop - the Classmate - below cost to drive him out of markets.
    Professor Negroponte, who aims to distribute millions of laptops to kids in developing countries, said Intel had hurt his mission "enormously".
    Speaking to US broadcaster CBS, Intel's chairman denied the claims.
    "We're not trying to drive him out of business," said Craig Barrett. "We're trying to bring capability to young people."
    Mr Barrett has previously dismissed the $100 laptop as a "gadget".
    Speaking to the BBC News website earlier this year Professor Negroponte said: "The concept has received a lot of criticism and yet after that criticism they are either copying it or doing things perfectly in line with the concept.
    "Yes people laugh at it, then they criticise it, then they copy it."
    Business practice
    Both Intel and Professor Negroponte's not for profit organisation, One Laptop per Child (OLPC), have developed a low cost, robust laptop aimed specifically at school children in the developing world.
    There are various differences in both the hardware and software, but Professor Negroponte believes the main problem is that his machine uses a processor designed by Intel's main competitor, AMD.
    "Intel and AMD fight viciously," he told CBS. "We're just sort of caught in the middle."
    Professor Negroponte says Intel has distributed marketing literature to governments with titles such as "the shortcomings of the One Laptop per Child approach", which outline the supposedly stronger points of the Classmate.
    Mr Barrett told CBS: "Someone at Intel was comparing the Classmate PC with another device being offered in the marketplace. That's the way our business works."
    He dismissed claims that Intel was trying to put OLPC out of business as "crazy".
    "There are lots of opportunities for us to work together," he said.
    Price drop
    Professor Negroponte's project is currently in a critical phase.
    Countries have until 31 May to place their orders for the first batch and will be able to purchase lots of 250,000.
    They will initially cost $176 (£90) but the eventual aim is to sell the machine to governments of developing countries for $100 (£50).
    Intel says it already has orders for "thousands" of Classmates, which currently cost over $200 (£100).
    Like the OLPC machine, Intel expects the price to eventually fall.
    Personally, I think this is a misguided idea - governments in countries with poor infrastructure paying for technology, when they could be funnelling it into infrastructure, schools, etc.

    And it certainly does sound very underhanded of Intel. One wonders if they would be more supportive if the cheap laptops had intel chips inside them.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    Kind of reminds of some other company that drives their competitors out of business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭kaizersoze


    tom dunne wrote:
    Personally, I think this is a misguided idea - governments in countries with poor infrastructure paying for technology, when they could be funnelling it into infrastructure, schools, etc.
    My thoughts exactly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭majiktripp


    tom dunne wrote:
    I think this is a misguided idea - governments in countries with poor infrastructure paying for technology, when they could be funnelling it into infrastructure, schools, etc.
    I Agree with your statement, its a bit pointless spending money on the flashy gimmick of the year when the countries that are targetted for these are wholey under developed and should be using the money for infrastructure..


Advertisement