Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gerry Adams on tax (RTE Just Now)

  • 06-05-2007 12:38pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭


    He was pressed strongly on tax, the SF policy is now to not raise corporation tax and to not consider anyone on 100,000 as rich, he did'nt say what the new SF definition of wealthy was. So it seems our money is safe! :D

    Mike.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    He was a bit evasive about income tax in general. He's not raising it but he's not lowering it either yet they are going to overhaul it! :confused:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    I thought he sounded unwell or something.

    - I wont be voting SF anytime soon......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,176 ✭✭✭1huge1


    ^ your not the only one thats for sure


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    He was a bit evasive about income tax in general. He's not raising it but he's not lowering it either yet they are going to overhaul it! :confused:

    SF evasive about their policies? unpossible! Their manifesto still isn't on their dedicated general election website. What are people voting for when they pick SF?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    SF evasive about their policies? unpossible! Their manifesto still isn't on their dedicated general election website. What are people voting for when they pick SF?
    Rights and reform. Don't they sound nice? Exactly what rights and reforms, nobody knows, but rights and reforms nonetheless.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There was a thread in the transport forum dealing with their transport policy..
    It got moved to the thunderdome after page 3 but the first 2 pages are emmmm interesting LoL.

    here it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭jd


    He sounded like he had a bad cold. I suspect from his vagueness that he wouldn't be able to recollect the income tax rates in the republic.
    jd


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Colonel Sanders


    What are people voting for when they pick SF?

    must say I've been asking myself this for years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    His lack of clarity spoke volumns. Sinn Fein are really good at convincing working class people that changes brought in their community was because of them. They allegedly come across as hard working.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    I often wondered why doesn't he stand for election down south? SF must have a few safe seats they could parachute him into.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Bond-007 wrote:
    I often wondered why doesn't he stand for election down south?
    Maybe it's because he's a British citizen. :eek: :):D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    That would not prevent him from standing for the Dail elections.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    He'd say I don't need to stand for election down here as SF is an all-Ireland party.

    Mike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    mike65 wrote:
    He'd say I don't need to stand for election down here as SF is an all-Ireland party.

    Mike.
    :D:D:D:D

    It would be such a killer for him if they got in that he couldn't call the shots in the Dail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Bond-007 wrote:
    That would not prevent him from standing for the Dail elections.
    I know Bond-007- it was a joke! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    SF evasive about their policies? unpossible! Their manifesto still isn't on their dedicated general election website. What are people voting for when they pick SF?

    Sinn Fein get votes based on loyalty to local individual and B) the wider republican credentials. Not manifestos and economic policies.

    ateam wrote:
    His lack of clarity spoke volumns. Sinn Fein are really good at convincing working class people that changes brought in their community was because of them. They allegedly come across as hard working.

    I take it your not working class yourself. You ever stop to think that the reason their really good at convincing working class people is because the change in their community can be linked to individual Sinn Fein TD's and councillors. Sinn Fein members are among the most active (And most importantly are seen to be) in disadvantaged areas, and that's not just at election time. As a party and as a movement I've no time for Sinn Fein but I could see myself voting for individual members.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Boston wrote:
    Sinn Fein get votes based on loyalty to local individual and B) the wider republican credentials. Not manifestos and economic policies
    "Wider republican credentials" isn't that important down south. Many voters in the ROI couldn't give a toss about NI but may care about economic policies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    "Wider republican credentials" isn't that important down south. Many voters in the ROI couldn't give a toss about NI but may care about economic policies.

    Well what you described there is why some don't vote for them. The question was why do people vote for them and Republicanism is a reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Boston wrote:
    Well what you described there is why some don't vote for them. The question was why do people vote for them and Republicanism is a reason.
    But they're interested in the people that don't vote for them. Not much point preaching to the converted, :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    There seems to be some communications problem here.
    Question: "What are people voting for when they pick SF"
    Answer: Local loyalty to individuals and republicanism

    You then make a true but irrelevant point in an apparent effort to contradict me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Boston wrote:
    There seems to be some communications problem here.
    Question: "What are people voting for when they pick SF"
    Answer: Local loyalty to individuals and republicanism

    You then make a true but irrelevant point in an apparent effort to contradict me.
    Point taken, but I think brianthebard may be asking why traditionally non-SF voters be tempted to vote for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭de5p0i1er


    darkman2 wrote:
    - I wont be voting SF anytime soon......

    Me neither but there are quite a few who will. Its seen as cool to vote SF by some young ppl who don't seem to know anything about politics. Sad really that they could get seats because there cool and not because they could do a good job of running the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    All politics is local and Sinn Fein are very good at local politics thats where most of their votes come from along with people who support the move from violence to politics in Northern Ireland.

    TBH I'd be more interested in knowing why turnout in Irish elections has fallen from the high 70's in the 1970's to low 60's in recent elections.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 trao


    Gerry seems to be saying that taxes won't go up for folks earning under 100k. I better chat with the landlord to see if we can set up a house redecoration fund to hide the balance of my pay packet from the Shinners.

    Until very recent times, SF still talked about a 32 socialist republic. Is that still SF's aim? During the interview Gerry talked about all Ireland corporate tax harmonisation, but he didn't provide a specific tax rate. They might up the Republic's corporation tax rate to help fund this socialist republic of theirs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    So they are planning to turn the country into Cuba?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,486 ✭✭✭miju


    mike65 wrote:
    He was pressed strongly on tax, the SF policy is now to not raise corporation tax and to not consider anyone on 100,000 as rich, .


    mmmmmmmmm , is it just me or is the SF policy coming more and more "similiar" to the FF policy ;);)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    miju wrote:
    mmmmmmmmm , is it just me or is the SF policy coming more and more "similiar" to the FF policy ;);)

    Well down south it has always been a case of spot the difference.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 trao


    miju wrote:
    mmmmmmmmm , is it just me or is the SF policy coming more and more "similiar" to the FF policy ;);)
    Surely you are not suggesting an FF/SF coalition?! Bertie was quite clear when he said that he would not go into coalition. Although he was also equally clear that in this funny world of democracy, he could not stop SF supporting his nomination as Taoiseach and voting for FF legislation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Voipjunkie


    miju wrote:
    mmmmmmmmm , is it just me or is the SF policy coming more and more "similiar" to the FF policy ;);)


    Adams signaled that on Primetime months ago when he was wishywashy when questioned on SF tax policy
    Basically SF don't want to have any policy that would rule them out since FF said that it was SFs economic policies that were now the block they have being u-turning on them just as they u-turned on the war, decommissioning, the unionist veto, taking seats in stormont, taking seats in Leinster House,supporting the PSNI etc etc they seem to be so desperate for power that anything that may block it is quickly dispensed with.
    It is hard to know exactly what SF do stand for I suppose that just like the Sticks that went before them it is only a matter of time before they end up in the Labour party.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Voipjunkie


    trao wrote:
    Surely you are not suggesting an FF/SF coalition?! Bertie was quite clear when he said that he would not go into coalition. Although he was also equally clear that in this funny world of democracy, he could not stop SF supporting his nomination as Taoiseach and voting for FF legislation


    Bertie was also quite clear that it was the economic policies of SF that he had a problem with if SF have dumped those then the way could be cleared if the numbers stack up which they probably will not


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    Listening to Adams today it was quite clear he was out of his "comfort zone" dealing with taxes and economic arguments.

    I would never vote for Sinn Fein. Id be shagged if my hard earned tax Euros went to support chavs and wasters,who operated in the black economy,and who skiddaddled off on holidays every second month at my expense,while i pay thorugh the hole for everything.

    No way Jose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    I think them in Government would be an absolute disaster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,041 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    irish1 wrote:
    Sinn Fein are very good at local politics thats where most of their votes come from
    :confused: A person can only vote for a candidate running in the constituency where their vote is based. How can the support not be "local"?

    Every TD who is elected is elected because of "local" support!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    :confused: A person can only vote for a candidate running in the constituency where their vote is based. How can the support not be "local"?

    Every TD who is elected is elected because of "local" support!

    Is it honestly that unclear?

    He's saying that local issues are often the deciding factors in elections not national ones. I think most people vote according to who will do the best for their community, rather then blindly following a certain party.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    :confused: A person can only vote for a candidate running in the constituency where their vote is based. How can the support not be "local"?

    Every TD who is elected is elected because of "local" support!

    You'd be surprised by how people make a party vote instead of an individual vote, also some of the constituency's are quite large.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,486 ✭✭✭miju


    trao wrote:
    Surely you are not suggesting an FF/SF coalition?! Bertie was quite clear when he said that he would not go into coalition. Although he was also equally clear that in this funny world of democracy, he could not stop SF supporting his nomination as Taoiseach and voting for FF legislation

    forgive me if i'm wrong but weren't FF equally as clear that they would not engage in auction politics NOR would they be making any changes to stamp duty

    thens theres aherns recent comments about the only problem FF have with SF's policy is there corporation tax being too high last week. this comment got overshoadowed by everything else in the last week though

    so two big u-turns they may as well go for the hattrick :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    Isn't it amazing what elections can do to politicans. It seems that the Shinners have learned the Feel and Fail trick of talking a lot without actually saying anything. It seems to me that Sinn Feins u-turn on these issues shows that they are no different to Feel and Fail in that they believe in nothing either, just what they will think will gain them votes. The only parties that have consistantly said the same things are FG, Lab and the Greens since the election was called. None of these parties have had policy/political u-turns since the start of the election campaign last Sunday. Sinn Fein changed their tune on taxation, the PDs on whether they should walk from government, and of course Feel and Fail on stamp duty. That from the supposedly prudent party. Now I know that FG did change its position on stamp duty slightly but the fact remains that we and Labour have been consistantly saying the same thing since the start of the election, on all the important issues.

    Its clear that we need a change. Its hardly sensible that we should elect the outgoing administration to go back in given that the two parties are not exactly on the best terms at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 HAZEMAN


    Gerry Adams doesn't seem to have any particular tax policy. It seemed from the interview that Gerry was very unknowledgable. I admire him for all that he has achieved in N Ireland, however I don't think it would be safe to have Sinn Fein in a position to look after our finances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    Maybe it's because he's a British citizen. :eek: :):D
    No he's not. He has an Irish passport.


Advertisement