Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

1421

  • 26-04-2007 9:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48


    a few years ago I read Gavin Menzies book 1421 which is about his theory that the chinese sailed the world and discovered Australia and America many years before europeans.

    was talking to a girl at work about ittoday cause she has just booked a holiday to china .

    to me the idea is perfectly acceptable and I could easily take it as fact, it is hugely convicing and seems to have sufficient evidence. has any1 read the book or does any1 have an opinion on the theory


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭boneless


    I have heard of the theory but have not read the book. However, there is archaeological evidence for the Vikings being on the North American continent 400 years previous to this. A Viking settlement has been excavated at Lans Aux Meadow in Nefoundland, Canada, dating to the 10th or 11th century. Interestingly, a ring pin which is similar to ones made in Dublin during this period was found on the site, so maybe it was Dubs who "found" America!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    i read the book and i have to say that wrecked junks dating from that period found all over the world is fairly conclusive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭millb


    Good book very convincing, like the DNA, another one by him follows up on some 10 years later


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    millb wrote: »
    Good book very convincing, like the DNA, another one by him follows up on some 10 years later

    Did he have DNA evidence?
    This site claimsto refute his ideas.
    http://www.1421exposed.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    absolute junk.

    Tim Severins account of the Brendan voyage is a basis for believing that Irish monks got to New World via Hebridies, Faroes, Iceland back in time of St Brendan.

    seems that Vikings got there using the same route also well before Columbus


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭Reekwind


    Balmed Out wrote: »
    i read the book and i have to say that wrecked junks dating from that period found all over the world is fairly conclusive.
    Except that it's nothing of the sort. The book is riddled with errors, omissions and pure conjecture, including the supposed junks. It's pseudohistory and nothing more

    Unfortunately, having his work shredded by actual historians didn't put Menzies off writing a sequel (1434) in which he claimed that the Chinese had sailed to Italy and launched the Renaissance. I wish I was making that up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    There is also a 'legend' concerning the Chinese/Japanese influence in the North and South Western US states -

    Quote -

    499 - The Chinese Discover America Almost A Thousand Years Before Columbus
    With current historical scholarship, none but the most myopically Eurocentric embrace the myth that Columbus "discovered" America in 1492. That feat, we now know, was accomplished tens of thousands of years ago by a small band of Chinese, the ancestors of Native Americans, who crossed over the Bering Strait into the Western hemisphere.

    The more we search for the first recorded visits to our Northwest Coast, the more fascinating the mystery becomes. Some years ago a portion of an early chart from the North Pacific was reproduced as the end papers of a book on local history. Outlines of the coast and entries about Spanish and Russian discoveries date it prior to the voyages of Captains Cook and Vancouver. One entry reads "Land which is supposed to be FOU SENG of the Chinese Geographers", this begins about 50° north. Also it is remarked that this is the "Coast seen by the Spanish in 1771 with inhabitants which go naked".

    There are other charts with similar details, a Hondius map from 1630 (Dutch) shows a Chinese junk in the area. "Fousang" shows up on other charts and maps, one from 1768 places it near the River of the West and what might be Puget Sound. Other reports of oriental visits and artifacts continue down the coast to Central America and beyond. Needless to say the coastlines and place names of the cartographers of the time are pure fancy, interesting in an historical sense as they show the growing interest in "Terra Incognito" or the last unknown seas and landset to be explored. See map.

    But it was in 499, a Chinese Buddhist missionary, Hoei-Shin, came back from a long voyage and told of a strange people in a strange land, 20,000 Chinese miles to the east. That would've put him right on the west coast of the Californians, then part of Mesoamerica.

    Hoei-Shin named the place Fusang, after a succulent plant he'd found in that arid land. The natives ate its roots and made wine from its sap. From its thick leaves they made cloth, rope, roof-thatch, and even paper. Hoei-Shin wrote about their society and folkways, all very unlike anything Chinese. Of course, the fusang plant sounds just like the Mexican maguey plant, the Agave americana which served so many functions for the pre-Columbian natives of Mexico.

    A French scholar, Deguignes, wrote about Fusang in 1761. A German professor, Neumann, published Hoei-Shin's narrative in 1841 along with a commentary. An American, Charles Leland, translated and expanded Neumann's work in 1875.

    According to some historians, the distances given by Hui-Sheng (20,000 Chinese li) would locate Fusang on the west coast of the American continent, when taking the ancient Han-period definition of the Chinese li. The Chinese li, or Chinese mile unit of distance, varied through time, and although it was roughly 435 meters during the Chin and Han dynasties, it was approximately 77 meters under the Wei and Western Qin dynasties, as used as such in the Sanguo Zhi or Records of Three Kingdoms. The description of the plants and people in the strange land led some scholars to suggest that the Chinese had visited America a thousand years before Columbus. Some Chinese and Buddhist artistic influences on the Mayan art of the period have also been suggested.

    The very simplicity of that enormous journey is the most convincing argument of all. Since Leland's book, experts have thrashed out the details with little public notice. Anthropologists have found Chinese and Japanese influences and artifacts among Native Americans all the way south to Peru. It appears that what Hoei-Shin was able to do, others probably did as well.

    None of this reaches the textbooks. And so we forget. We forget there was a Russian capital on our west coast before the Gold Rush. There was a university in Mexico City before Shakespeare. We forget that, just as the Roman empire fell, Chinese missionaries were preaching to pre-Aztec Mexicans.

    End quote.


    Makes ya think, eh?

    tac


Advertisement