Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sunshine

  • 23-04-2007 5:03pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭


    I'm not sure if anyone saw the Film Sunshine....

    But it was am insult to reality, You cannot go into space without a space suit, and not just because it's cold, which is what the film basically said...

    Anyone else not like the complete science fiction it jumped in and out of?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭Crucifix


    I haven't seen the movie, but the idea that you'll instantly explode in a total vaccuum isn't true. Blood vessels may rupture and so on, but your skin is actually quite strong. AFAIK it's the oxygen loss that actually kills.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    You get a pretty vicious case of the bends too, I would imagine. Can't imagine what having the air sucked out of your lungs would be like!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Hmm... Lungs collapsing, pretty instant blindness, all sorts of internal things rupturing. I can imagine it'd be fairly quick though. But what would get you first I don't know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭breadmonkey


    What a great film though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭enda1


    I can't imagine that it would be that cold in space. You can only lose thermal energy by radiation, not through conduction or convection. I really cant imagine that it would be at that hihgh a rate either even if you were say in the shadow of a spacecraft. It think its more likely, in the solar system anyway that it would be far hotter, (never mind the high frequency radiation) than on earth!

    Though this film amy be based in deep space, i havent seen it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Professor_Fink


    While the film wasn't necessarily accurate, it is worth baring in mind that they were forced out of a pressurized chamber (the air lock) over what is essentially a very small distance. You would expect them to have been surrounded by a pocket of low density gas, so the vacuum wouldn't have been as strong as if they had just materialized in an empty region of space.

    Also, being surrounded by gas would have seriously increased the rate at which they lost heat.

    Again, I'm not saying it was accurate, just that it is certainly justifiable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,402 ✭✭✭andy1249


    Wasnt that stunt in Battlestar Gallactica as well , a couple of weeks ago ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Professor_Fink


    Enda1: It is much much colder once you leave the Earths atmosphere.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Actually I thought the science in this was fairly decent for a sci-fi flick. The instant without the space suit was very short - they held in their breath and were propelled across a small distance. The guy without the spacesuit also suffered damage from the intense cold and
    the one who missed the airlock, died as his blood vessels were ruptured.
    .

    They made a point also, in terms of temperature, of it being -273C outside.

    Some of the basic concepts there were fairly sound too - the difficult in altering trajectories, using a hydroponics bay for O2 supply, the concept of re-igniting a star with fissile material is even not too far-fetched (even if the sun being so cold stretches it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭humbert


    holding your breath in a near vacuum would be impressive!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    They had some astrophysicist involved in it to help maintain realistic physics from what I read (well, everything physics related but the ending). I don't know since I've not seen the film, but I'm not well up on astrophysics stuff anyway so I probably wouldn't notice anything but basic mistakes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,900 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    enda1 wrote:
    I can't imagine that it would be that cold in space. You can only lose thermal energy by radiation, not through conduction or convection.

    Its not that you lose heat, its that there is nothing in space to hold the heat, no mass to conduct heat, no liquids or gas to move heat through convection,
    radiation pass straight through.
    There is no heat anywhere, no heat energy, so you body becomes a radiating source, and you lose it far quicker than on earth,
    think of the temp difference on the moon
    ixoy wrote:
    The instant without the space suit was very short - they held in their breath and were propelled across a small distance.
    The fact that they held their breath makes it worse, if they tried to do it, the gas in lungs would expand a great deal if they went from 1 bar to near vacuum.
    If they blew evrything out and tried it empty it would be more believable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Professor_Fink


    Mellor wrote:
    There is no heat anywhere, no heat energy, so you body becomes a radiating source, and you lose it far quicker than on earth,
    think of the temp difference on the moon

    Just to be accurate, it's about 3 Kelvin due to the CMB.


Advertisement