Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

max man days for reserves

  • 16-04-2007 6:12pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭


    should the cap on the amount of man days for the rdf but mainly the nsr be removed


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,921 ✭✭✭Alkers


    I would think so but IIRC the cap is due to EU legislation that if you work more than 42 days a year you would be considered full time?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭testicle


    Simona1986 wrote:
    I would think so but IIRC the cap is due to EU legislation that if you work more than 42 days a year you would be considered full time?

    Bullsh1t. That's what we are told, but no one has yet found any legislation to state this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭babybundy


    no if you work more then they have to set up a pension fund and a few other bits and we are lucky to get paid at all


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭testicle


    babybundy wrote:
    no if you work more then they have to set up a pension fund and a few other bits and we are lucky to get paid at all

    Again, bullsh1t. Find me the relevant legislation. I'll be waiting, it does not exist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,518 ✭✭✭OS119


    babybundy wrote:
    no if you work more then they have to set up a pension fund and a few other bits and we are lucky to get paid at all

    sounds a bit fishy to me...

    in the UK the TA has no pension provision despite both compulsory mobilisation and voluntary Full Time Reserve Service (a way for TA soldiers to join a regular Army unit for a year, either at home or abroad, to plug holes in the regular army). the BG managed to persuade the courts that despite the two above examples the TA soldiers were 'temporary workers'. which went down like a sh1t sandwich as you can imagine.

    if the BG can get EU legislation to say what it wants i don't see why the IG can't. unless of course the current situation is one the IG does actually want....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭babybundy


    is a pension fund manditory in england


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Judt


    One of our biggest costs in the defence budget (compared to say, the US, proportionally) is paying everyone. So legislation or no I'd point back towards the bean counters in the department - which makes sense, as it costs more than five grand to pay a section on the ground for a week (let alone other costs). Multiply that by a few thousand souls, add a bit for rank and you have to either increase the defence budget, or cut something from the PDF who will (at the end of the day) be the chaps going off to do the fun stuff for real somewhere. Real politik and all that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,921 ✭✭✭Alkers


    I was always told it was legislation anyway. If this is not the case then I think the cap should be extended for the NSR in particular, I don't know what the situation in the Army RDF is, do people often use up all their man-days?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 536 ✭✭✭babybundy


    as i said earlier the nsr max should be raised if we cant recruit enough for the navey then bring uo the ranks with the reserves


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭testicle


    There's plenty in the Naval Service. Infact I think it may be over strength.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement