Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

4-tracking Northern Line

Options
  • 27-03-2007 9:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭


    Will it be possible in future to four track the Northern Line out of Connolly to Dundalk or has there been to much develpment near the line in recent years to allow this?. Will people have to wait for the interconnector before capacity on the line will be suitably increased?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 220 ✭✭MLM


    This was planned. Maybe not as far as Dundalk but I remember reading about it somewhere. I think the plan was four track to Howth Junction and three track on the southside to Dalkey or somewhere.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Slice


    It's shame this is not given more priority since any increase in services beyond the Dart network on the northern line would only further compromise frequency of Dart services.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,801 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    there is space most of the way from Connolly to Howth Jct, but it would require rebuilding most of the stations. Southside I would say its impossible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,858 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    loyatemu wrote:
    there is space most of the way from Connolly to Howth Jct, but it would require rebuilding most of the stations.

    Eh, I don't think there is....


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,546 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    loyatemu wrote:
    there is space most of the way from Connolly to Howth Jct, but it would require rebuilding most of the stations. Southside I would say its impossible.

    There is space beside the tracks for most of the route, but all stations and most bridges ( Killester looks like it has the space for 4 tracks) would have to be rebuilt and there would be a lot of big engineering problems, like widening the existing embankment from Fairview to the Howth Road bridge and some large retaining wall for the sections in cuttings between Killester and Raheny.

    A much cheaper option would be to 4-track the Metro Line to the airport and continue it Rush/Donabate. This would allow anything north of Malihide to divert via the airport and leave the Malihide/Connolly line to exclusivly commuter use.

    While i cannot site any costs, 4-Tracking an as yet unbuilt like has to be cheaper than 4-tracking the northern line and would avoid any distuption to existing services.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭Ste.phen


    Apart from the fact that the raised alignment is only 2 tracks wide, i can't personally think of anywhere that CPOing someone's back garden wouldn't result in being able to throw in 2 extra tracks.
    I'm probably wrong though, i'm sure there's somewhere on the route that the tracks pass close by a large building, etc, where a CPO isn't viable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,546 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Igy wrote:
    Apart from the fact that the raised alignment is only 2 tracks wide, i can't personally think of anywhere that CPOing someone's back garden wouldn't result in being able to throw in 2 extra tracks.

    A few houses and other Buildings would have to go if they 4-tracked the line north of Connolly and a few houses near Kilbarrick station would be a bit too close to the line to be viable after any 4-tracking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭Pineapple stu


    They have just finished extending the platforms on the north side dart line and starting shortly on the grange road station so they wont be puting in extra tracks. There is no room anyway.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,529 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    A much cheaper option would be to 4-track the Metro Line to the airport and continue it Rush/Donabate. This would allow anything north of Malihide to divert via the airport and leave the Malihide/Connolly line to exclusivly commuter use.

    While i cannot site any costs, 4-Tracking an as yet unbuilt like has to be cheaper than 4-tracking the northern line and would avoid any distuption to existing services.

    A number of problems with that, the biggest technical problem being that the Metro will most likely be European standard gauge rather than Irish gauge. While it won't be on street, it will be near street level in places, something not compatible with Enterprise / InterCity services. Also, it won't link in (I don't mean in terms of interchange stations, I mean the tracks physically joined to) with the existing network, and will be owned by a completely different organisation (the RPA/future Dublin Transport Authority instead of CIE).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Slice


    A much cheaper option would be to 4-track the Metro Line to the airport and continue it Rush/Donabate. This would allow anything north of Malihide to divert via the airport and leave the Malihide/Connolly line to exclusivly commuter use.

    I don't think this would be a cheaper option - half of Metro North will be underground remember


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,888 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    What about four tracking certain stations along the Northern Commuter line only.

    That way the DARTs could wait to let the commuter trains past and the Commuters could wait to let the Enterprise past.

    If the system was timetabled properly and the trains run efficiently, it would be great. There is nothing worse than being on the 1735 ex Connolly and having to crawl along at 5mph so as not to get too close to the DART in front.

    If the DART could wait at its platform in Harmonstown untill the Commuter goes by then it would ease alot of the problems.

    As it stands though, I have been on the 1707 ex Connolly, waiting for the train to leave when a DART pulls into the station, picks up and lets off and heads out in front of the Commuter service. Then the Commuter is forced to crawl out the line.

    Could the people of Irish Rail be trusted to run a proper service if they were given the infrastructure to do so?


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,293 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    A much cheaper option would be to 4-track the Metro Line to the airport and continue it Rush/Donabate. This would allow anything north of Malihide to divert via the airport and leave the Malihide/Connolly line to exclusivly commuter use. While i cannot site any costs, 4-Tracking an as yet unbuilt like has to be cheaper than 4-tracking the northern line and would avoid any distuption to existing services.
    You can't mix heavy and light rail vehicles. In an accident a train would make mincemeat of a Metro / tram.

    3- or 4-tracking might not be cheaper with Metro as it would be tunneled and would need to be connected somewhere anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,546 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Victor wrote:
    You can't mix heavy and light rail vehicles. In an accident a train would make mincemeat of a Metro / tram.

    Ok, build a good wall between the Metro and Train track.
    Victor wrote:
    3- or 4-tracking might not be cheaper with Metro as it would be tunneled and would need to be connected somewhere anyway.

    The "train" tracks could diverge from the Metro allignment and join the midland line into connolly, or go into Heuston via the park tunnel.


Advertisement