Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

e^inx = 0 ?

  • 21-03-2007 11:46pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭


    I have come up with this recently and i am unable to determine if it is true, or even possible!

    It can be shown that a linear combination of sines and cosines can be represented purely as a cosine function:
    Acos(nx) + Bsin(nx) = Dcos(nx - d) **
    where A, B are constants, D is square root(A^2 + B^2) and tan d = B/A

    consider f(x) = e^inx
    where i is square root(-1), n is a constant

    using the maclaurin series it can be shown that
    e^inx = cos(nx) + i.sin(nx) ***

    equation ** then says that *** is equivalent to
    Dcos(nx - d)
    where tan d = i and D = square root(1^2 + i^2)
    this implies that D = square root[1 + (-1)] = 0

    this implies that:
    e^inx = 0.cos(nx - d) = 0




    however, i do not know if eq. ** only applies to real numbers A & B or even if d can be evaluated [tan d = i] (or even if this d matters since it is all being multiplied by zero!)
    can anyone clarify this situation for me?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 107 ✭✭seandoiler


    this is what i think...so assume you can and proceed as follows
    well if you take tan[d]=i, this then evaluates d to be a complex infinity, and hence the term cos(nx-d) becomes infinity...and so D.Cos(nx-d) is this case is undefined, so by contradiction i guess you can't write e^inx as DCos(nx-d).....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 Precision


    Euler formula

    e^(i.y) = cos y + i.sin y

    (where y is an angle in units of radians).

    pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795

    Letting y = pi

    e^(i.pi) = cos pi + i.sin pi = -1 + i.0

    therefore

    e^(i.pi) = -1

    Also

    e^(i.pi/2) = i

    e^(-i.pi/2) = -i

    e^(2.i.pi) = 1

    e^(-i.pi) = -1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,344 ✭✭✭p to the e


    also to reiterate what seandoiler said if you take the natural log of both sides it tends towards infinity.


Advertisement