Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Odds Question

  • 20-03-2007 4:20pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭


    There is 11,600 in the middle

    Player A then goes awweeen for more chips than god.

    Player B will be all in if he calls - At what point should player B fold/call? i.e. what is the breakeven point in chips between folding and calling?

    Flop 5 6 7r, and you reckon player A has an overpair to the board, Player B has Q 8 for an oesd.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 780 ✭✭✭Captain Tom


    well isnt a straight draw approximately 2-1 to hit?

    in that case isnt the breakeven point for folding 11.6k?

    edit:sorry this is assuming your queen isnt live.and im probably wrong anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭sikes


    you have 41.2% equity( assuming overpair being TT. If its 99, KK, AA, obviously everything changes)

    so x being our stack

    (11,600 + (x)) / x = 1.427

    = 27,166.27

    maybe...

    EDIT:

    If range is 99-AA then we have 36% equity

    (11600 + x) / x = 1.78

    =14,871.79


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,902 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    the vilian has an overpair, 88-AA
    you have max 11 outs (TT,JJ) *12 counts
    min 3 outs (88) *3 counts
    (QQ-AA) has you on 8 outs *18 counts
    and (99) has 5 outs *6 counts
    that averages out at 8.08 outs, taking 8 as the closest.
    You have 8 outs and he has no redraws to your straight.
    This is practically 36%. (8/45+8/44)
    when we win we gain 11600+x, when we lose we drop x

    win = .36 * (11600+x)
    lose = .64 * (x)

    break even when these are equal
    4176+.36x=.64x
    4176=.28x
    x=4176/.28
    x=14914.29

    slighty different method to sikes, might be easier to follow,
    different answer probably due to rounding of values. but its approaching the 14.9K mark


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭BigCityBanker


    Mellor wrote:
    x=14914.29

    I was assuming that I had 8 outs - any 4 or 9 and stuffed 17k into the middle. not great i suppose but fcek it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,646 ✭✭✭cooker3


    Mellor wrote:
    the vilian has an overpair, 88-AA
    you have max 11 outs (TT,JJ) *12 counts
    min 3 outs (88) *3 counts
    (QQ-AA) has you on 8 outs *18 counts
    and (99) has 5 outs *6 counts
    that averages out at 8.08 outs, taking 8 as the closest.
    You have 8 outs and he has no redraws to your straight.
    This is practically 36%. (8/45+8/44)
    when we win we gain 11600+x, when we lose we drop x

    win = .36 * (11600+x)
    lose = .64 * (x)

    break even when these are equal
    4176+.36x=.64x
    4176=.28x
    x=4176/.28
    x=14914.29

    slighty different method to sikes, might be easier to follow,
    different answer probably due to rounding of values. but its approaching the 14.9K mark


    I am confused, where did you get the 4176 from in the final equation :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭HiCloy


    I'm getting a lower value than ye:

    From pokerstove:

    Q8: 35.059%
    88+: 64.941%

    So breakeven point is 13,609.68. Fold if you have more chips than this.

    If you include the possibility of him having a set things get worse:

    Q8:32.976%
    55+: 67.024%

    So breakeven point is now 11,234.77


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭sikes


    HiCloy wrote:
    I'm getting a lower value than ye:

    From pokerstove:

    Q8: 35.059%
    88+: 64.941%

    So breakeven point is 13,609.68. Fold if you have more chips than this.

    Yeah you are right. My range was 99+

    (11600 + X)/X = 1.852
    11600 = X(1.852-1)
    11600/.852 = X
    =13615.02


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭padser


    I was assuming that I had 8 outs - any 4 or 9 and stuffed 17k into the middle. not great i suppose but fcek it!

    Very simple maths (and in fairness if your trying to do it during the game it needs to be simple) says if you have 8 outs, thats roughly 1 in 6 to hit on the turn, and again on the river. Call it 1 in 3 (knowing that its closer to 1-3.5) and if you are going all in for more then pot, and only getting one caller - you can't get back three times what you put in - so its gotta be a fold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭BigCityBanker


    ok - damn 16600 in the middle and then he goes all in....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭sikes


    (16600 + X)/x = 1.852
    16600 = X(1.852-1)
    16600/.852 = X
    =19483.57


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,902 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    ok - damn 16600 in the middle and then he goes all in....

    thats a +EV call, ;)
    cooker3 wrote:
    I am confused, where did you get the 4176 from in the final equation
    its from the win line. (.36*11600)

    win = .36 * (11600+x) =4176+.36x
    lose = .64 * (x) = .64x
    then made them equal

    4176+.36x=.64x


    padser wrote:
    Very simple maths (and in fairness if your trying to do it during the game it needs to be simple) says if you have 8 outs, thats roughly 1 in 6 to hit on the turn, and again on the river. Call it 1 in 3 (knowing that its closer to 1-3.5) and if you are going all in for more then pot, and only getting one caller - you can't get back three times what you put in - so its gotta be a fold.
    Well its actually about 1 in 2.8
    so the pot can be slightly smaller than your stack.
    In the original the pot was too much smaller, but now that the original pot is actually 16k, its a call all-in for 17k


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭sikes


    Mellor wrote:
    In the original the pot was too much smaller, but now that the original pot is actually 16k, its a call all-in for 19k
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,902 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    sorry, I know he could of push in up to 19k with a +EV
    but was saying push for 17k as its all he had left.

    guessing you pushed and missed BCB and were wondering if its was right to do so


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭BigCityBanker


    Mellor wrote:
    guessing you pushed and missed BCB and were wondering if its was right to do so

    no I insta called as I was pretty sure I was getting the right price. A few ppl at the table shot me some funny glances tho. I wasnt convinced I was getting the right price but I knew it was fairly ballpark. Not something I am in the habit of doing.


Advertisement