Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

which poker site

  • 10-03-2007 11:37am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭


    I play UB atmo clearing a 3k bonus but will move when it’s clear.
    which is the best site to move to since the american legislation?
    Looking for a good selection of games 1/2 2/4 a good RB deal
    PT and PAhud support

    edit:: should have read the Ipoker thread below first. pokersitescout

    ipoker are third in cash player volume after party and stars.i was surprised to see party as no1 still. no RB on party or stars though.
    party are doing a $1 per 100 points now.how does this compare to a RB deal


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    Interpoker on the crypto network. you can get 35% rakeback and theres a $1000 montly reload bonus for 8000 mpps ( its only $500 for the first month I think)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭dvdfan


    Just looking at the stt's on interpoker, there different because they go by hands played and not time. So they play 10 hands per level, how would this compare to the old 10 min levels on tribeca would this be around the same or more like 7 minutes????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭luckylucky


    dvdfan wrote:
    Just looking at the stt's on interpoker, there different because they go by hands played and not time. So they play 10 hands per level, how would this compare to the old 10 min levels on tribeca would this be around the same or more like 7 minutes????


    I think the average number of hands on a full table is normally about 65 to 70 per hour - at least in a ring game, so it would probably be ball park a little less than 10 minutes per level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭valor


    a $3000 bonus!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭dvdfan


    Thanks Lucky. Just wondering can anyone recommend a good site for STT's as since ive moved to ipoker i dont really like the structure as i seem to be getting all in too often too early and its relying more on luck than strategy. Anyone think of a good site structure wise that gives you a decent amount of time to try and double up with a good hand early on so i can afford to play more aggressive when i get to the bubble. Pokerstars seems to have a good structure but would there games be tougher than normal and i would like a fishy site too like the old tribeca. Maybe i just need more time to get used to the ipoker sng's but there blinds are only 7 mins. I do like there MTT structure though


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭nicnicnic


    dvdfan wrote:
    Thanks Lucky. Just wondering can anyone recommend a good site for STT's as since ive moved to ipoker i dont really like the structure as i seem to be getting all in too often too early and its relying more on luck than strategy. Anyone think of a good site structure wise that gives you a decent amount of time to try and double up with a good hand early on so i can afford to play more aggressive when i get to the bubble. Pokerstars seems to have a good structure but would there games be tougher than normal and i would like a fishy site too like the old tribeca. Maybe i just need more time to get used to the ipoker sng's but there blinds are only 7 mins. I do like there MTT structure though

    maybe betfair I dont play there but think the structure is the same as stars think ultimate is similar


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭luckylucky


    dvdfan wrote:
    Thanks Lucky. Just wondering can anyone recommend a good site for STT's as since ive moved to ipoker i dont really like the structure as i seem to be getting all in too often too early and its relying more on luck than strategy. Anyone think of a good site structure wise that gives you a decent amount of time to try and double up with a good hand early on so i can afford to play more aggressive when i get to the bubble. Pokerstars seems to have a good structure but would there games be tougher than normal and i would like a fishy site too like the old tribeca. Maybe i just need more time to get used to the ipoker sng's but there blinds are only 7 mins. I do like there MTT structure though

    party poker has always had beatable sng games imo, tbh though if u want a real change in general cash games are more profitable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭dvdfan


    Might try betfair and party and see how they go. How do you find the structure on party, when i click on a table it shows tourney info and seated players in a box below but it dosent say chips amounts or blinds structures anywhere???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,894 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    valor wrote:
    a $3000 bonus!?
    mistake i think? I set up an account there and it was a $300 bonus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭ZZR1100


    valor wrote:
    a $3000 bonus!?

    yes . its old. they did a promo a long time ago where they matched your SNG entry with bonus $. i moved sites before clearing it. it was actually around 4.5 k


  • Advertisement
Advertisement