Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Real life just too damned liberal for you?

Options
  • 03-03-2007 6:37pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭


    If so, Conservapedia is here to help you get your correctly formed, singular, narrow-minded outlook back in shape.
    Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we favor Christianity and America. Conservapedia has easy-to-use indexes to facilitate review of topics. You will much prefer using Conservapedia compared to Wikipedia if you want concise answers free of "political correctness".


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 37,295 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    If so, Conservapedia is here to help you get your correctly formed, singular, narrow-minded outlook back in shape.
    Christanity and "free from Political Correctness" can never exist in the same line.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    From "ancient history"
    some experts reconstruct a point of origin in southeastern Europe near the Baltic, not far from the Ararat mountain range cited in the Bible in connection with Noah

    Typical Americans :D

    Asia, Europe, Baltics ...who cares ...over there, anyway :D


    oh ...and here's another real gem:
    The Celts
    The Celts were the first ethnic group to become widespread in Europe. Using tribes rather than stable civilizations, the Celts began in central Europe and migrated west beginning in about 500 B.C. to the British Isles (especially Ireland) and also northwest France and portions of Spain. Their religion consisted of worshipping gods and goddesses, and their priests were called “druids”. They had no written language but often told myths and folktales. The Boston Celtics basketball team is named after the Celts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭DaBreno


    Website wrote:
    Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we favor Christianity and America

    Nothing beats facts like a bit o' Bias!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo
    According to the origins model used by creation scientists, modern kangaroos, like all modern animals, originated in the Middle East[1] and are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah's Ark prior to the Great Flood.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Saddam was captured by America, and, after a trial, hanged on December 30, 2006, as he had received a suspended sentence.

    Oh ...so hanging someone is a suspended sentence ?

    A nice turn of phrase :D

    T'would be really funny, if it wasn't so frightening :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭tba


    Africa
    The continent south of Europe and south-east[citation needed] of Asia. Is that all we know about it? Somebody add something please.

    eh..


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭Blowfish


    Sea
    A body of water but not as large as an ocean.
    God their smart...

    http://www.conservapedia.com/CE
    That one is just hilarious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Sofaspud


    Blowfish wrote:
    God their smart...

    They're


    Sorry


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭So Glad


    Sofaspud wrote:
    They're


    Sorry

    My GOD!

    Leave....


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Sofaspud


    So Glad wrote:
    My GOD!

    Yes?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭So Glad


    Sofaspud wrote:
    Yes?

    You shall NOT bring your blasphemous ways here, HEATHEN!

    Off with ye!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭andrew


    this IS a joke, right.... just making sure


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    andrew wrote:
    this IS a joke, right.... just making sure
    Actually, apparently not. Which makes me sad.

    Its gotten a bit of media attention, and according to the New York Times (quoting Wired Magazine)
    Conservapedia project leader, Andrew Schlafly, “started the site in late November 2006 in conjunction with 58 high-school-level, home-schooled students from the New Jersey area” because he was frustrated by what he sees as the liberal bias in Wikipedia.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    Any nation that can come up with creationism as a plausible belief system is more than capable of coming up with stuff like this.

    I've searched for loads of stuff that they simply don't have an entry for....I'm half tempted to make some tongue in cheek entries but they'll just delete em so f*ck it.
    For instance, nothing on http://www.conservapedia.com/antartica
    but they have http://www.conservapedia.com/New_Jersey_State_Interscholastic_Athletic_Association


    If they care so much about liberal bias on wiki why not edit articles so they conformed more with a neutral agenda....by very definition most of the stuff enetered on wiki is entered by pretty well educated people, who are usually, by the by, of a liberal persuasion (at least by the standards these people seem to maintain)...


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭Blowfish


    Wertz wrote:
    Any nation that can come up with creationism as a plausible belief system is more than capable of coming up with stuff like this.
    Creationism has been around far far longer than america has.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭So Glad


    By the way, what is the creationist's stand on fossils, dinosaurs, rock dates and general common sense? "God put them there to test our faith"?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭tba


    They conjecture that fossils and rock layers are circularly self referential in their dating techniques.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭So Glad


    tba wrote:
    They conjecture that fossils and rock layers are circularly self referential in their dating techniques.

    I don't get you. What about dinosaurs?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭tba


    They say that there was dinosaurs but they were around at the time of the old testament. The say the age of the fossils is conjecture based on the age of the rock layers. (Apparently The rock layers are based on the age of the fossils) Therefore the comparison is recursive.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    http://www.conservapedia.com/Dinosaur
    Some claim there are a number of lines of evidence that point to dinosaurs and man coexisting. For example, trained scientists have reported seeing a live dinosaur. A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today. An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which is claimed to point to dinosaurs and man existing. The World Book Encyclopedia states that: "The dragons of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth. Dragons were generally evil and destructive. Every country had them in its mythology." The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century piece of art, is said to appear to be a piece of artwork that shows a dinosaur and man coexisting. This is quite hard evidence.

    ...

    Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the Bible obviously does not use the word "dinosaur." However, they are alleged to be mentioned in numerous places throughout the biblical account. For example, the behemoth in Job and the leviathan in Isaiah are sometimes said to be references to dinosaurs, although they could have been references to any large animal of the time such as hippopotomi and crocodiles.

    You have to remember that their favoured scientific journals appear to be answeringgenesis.org and a series of books titled Exploring Creation with...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Sofaspud


    tba wrote:
    They say that there was dinosaurs but they were around at the time of the old testament. The say the age of the fossils is conjecture based on the age of the rock layers. (Apparently The rock layers are based on the age of the fossils) Therefore the comparison is recursive.

    Apologies to the Bill Hicks thread, but it just fits so well.
    Bill Hicks wrote:
    "You know the world's 12 thousand years old and dinosaurs existed, they existed in that time, you'd think it would have been mentioned in the ****ing Bible at some point. "And lo Jesus and the disciples walked to Nazareth. But the trail was blocked by a giant brontosaurus... with a splinter in his paw. And O the disciples did run a shriekin': 'What a big fucking lizard, Lord!' But Jesus was unafraid and he took the splinter from the brontosaurus's paw and the big lizard became his friend. And Jesus sent him to Scotland where he lived in a loch for O so many years inviting thousands of American tourists to bring their fat fucking families and their fat dollar bills.And oh Scotland did praise the Lord. Thank you Lord, thank you Lord. Thank you Lord."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭So Glad


    God damn creationists and their incompatibility to think. What is WRONG with these people? The bible was written by people, sure some if it could be useful/true but not everything is truth, for example: "The world is 6000 years old"......**** off and die......

    Prove it. Bar saying "It's in the bible, so it's true" because that is pure, unadulterated arrogance and stupidity.

    I know there is a Santa, because me mammy said so!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 992 ✭✭✭Eglinton


    From the George Bush page -
    Though the liberal media continues to disparage Bush's handling of the economy, they often neglect to report the many aspects of the economy that Bush has improved. For example, during his term Exxon Mobile has posted the largest profit of any company in a signle year, and executive salaries have greatly increased as well

    My my, those poor executives must have been really on the breadline until George W. came along. The world is safe again :D


Advertisement