Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sunday

  • 21-01-2007 11:29am
    #1
    gamb1or
    Closed Accounts Posts: 323 ✭✭


    2.00 Fairyhouse

    Nickname

    Do I need to explain this one? Should win this.

    2.40 Towcester

    Iloveturtle (e/w)


    14/1 imo is a good price. Can handle the distance and likes the ground, weight isn't ideal, but a place is still possible. Won 2 of it's last 3 races with Cullinane on board.


Comments

  • #2
    Tush
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Tush


    What should win the 2.00 fairyhouse gamb1or???:)


  • #3
    scojones
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭scojones


    gamb1or wrote:
    2.40 Towcester

    Iloveturtle (e/w)


    14/1 imo is a good price. Can handle the distance and likes the ground, weight isn't ideal, but a place is still possible. Won 2 of it's last 3 races with Cullinane on board.

    Interesting contestant alright. Flopped last time out but was up considerably in the weights from its win in December, and that was for horses rated up to 105. Back to class 5 it should handle the company, but the weights would be a worry for me. Cullinane is proving to be a useful claimer on board, and takes 7 lbs off it again today. I'd be surprised if it won, and you're right a place is possible. Take the 14s now, this race is a PP special, if the price goes out it doesn't matter, you'll get the greater SP.


  • #4
    fade2black
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭fade2black


    Cork Bumper - Nancy Wake

    Harrington's horse Herculies is fancied in Cork in the 3:55.

    No time for write ups. I'm a busy man you know.


  • #5
    Tubbertown1982
    Closed Accounts Posts: 174 ✭✭Tubbertown1982


    i expect Little Tommy to at least place in the 2.15 in Cork. 7/1 a good price, beaten by a short head last time out, Double Kudos looks dangerous.


  • #6
    Tush
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Tush


    Have the first 2 up in a €100 win treble Moore's Law @ 7/4 , Black Harry @ 5/4 all going on to Justified in the next.So cmon Conor O D,do me a favour.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Tubbertown1982
    Closed Accounts Posts: 174 ✭✭Tubbertown1982


    Tush wrote:
    Have the first 2 up in a €100 win treble Moore's Law @ 7/4 , Black Harry @ 5/4 all going on to Justified in the next.So cmon Conor O D,do me a favour.


    Unlucky man, betting against Nickname was very brave.


  • #8
    gamb1or
    Closed Accounts Posts: 323 ✭✭gamb1or


    Tush wrote:
    Have the first 2 up in a €100 win treble Moore's Law @ 7/4 , Black Harry @ 5/4 all going on to Justified in the next.So cmon Conor O D,do me a favour.


    Surprised none of you backed nickname today...that was a banker if i ever saw one.


  • #9
    Tubbertown1982
    Closed Accounts Posts: 174 ✭✭Tubbertown1982


    gamb1or wrote:
    Surprised none of you backed nickname today...that was a banker if i ever saw one.


    Agree


  • #10
    scojones
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭scojones


    Why do you think none of us backed Nickname? :)


  • #11
    Tush
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Tush


    Tubbertown1982 wrote:
    Unlucky man, betting against Nickname was very brave.
    yeah I have now made my mind up that trebs and patents are not for me Tubber,will stick to singles and the odd double.


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    Tush
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Tush


    This Apache Fort must have a big chance in the next at wolves,encouraging run lto and should strip fitter for it.


  • #13
    Tush
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Tush


    Tush wrote:
    This Apache Fort must have a big chance in the next at wolves,encouraging run lto and should strip fitter for it.
    Drifted like a barge and wins easily at 7/1 :eek:


  • #14
    Tush
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Tush


    Dower House 15.50

    Might be the one to give the fav most trouble here.


  • #15
    gamb1or
    Closed Accounts Posts: 323 ✭✭gamb1or


    sjones wrote:
    Why do you think none of us backed Nickname? :)

    Why didn't you post your selections here?

    If wannabet.ie ended up not working out, i don't think letsbet will.


  • #16
    fr wishy washy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 882 ✭✭✭fr wishy washy


    gamb1or wrote:
    Surprised none of you backed nickname today...that was a banker if i ever saw one.


    I thought he was beatable today going right-handed and I wasn't sure whether Ruby got on with the horse so I opposed it.


  • #17
    gamb1or
    Closed Accounts Posts: 323 ✭✭gamb1or


    fr wishy washy wrote:
    I wasn't sure whether Ruby got on with the horse so I opposed it.

    That why i didn't back brave inca the last time...stupid reason really


  • #18
    wba88
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭wba88


    I backed nickname in an accumulator, and it worked out very well. thanx lads!


  • #19
    fr wishy washy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 882 ✭✭✭fr wishy washy


    gamb1or wrote:
    That why i didn't back brave inca the last time...stupid reason really
    Nickname didn't do a tap for Ruby at Punchestown but that's the way it goes.


  • #20
    scojones
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭scojones


    gamb1or wrote:
    Why didn't you post your selections here?

    If wannabet.ie ended up not working out, i don't think letsbet will.

    What have wannabet or letsbet got to do with me not posting any selections here today? Wannabet didn't work out because Devore was not committed to it, and I have absolutely nothing to do with either of these so I don't see the relevance.

    I did not post any selections here today because the racing today was utter cack.


  • #21
    gamb1or
    Closed Accounts Posts: 323 ✭✭gamb1or


    sjones wrote:

    I did not post any selections here today because the racing today was utter cack.


    It was good enough for you to post them at letsbet...

    I'm just hoping that won't be a regular occurence.


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    scojones
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭scojones


    gamb1or wrote:
    It was good enough for you to post them at letsbet...

    I'm just hoping that won't be a regular occurence.

    I didn't post any detailed selections there, I posted a spreadsheet. I didn't even list the selections in the post - because there was no point. I'm keeping track of my progress, financially, on there. This is why I posted the spreadsheet; I made three bets that day I had to update it.

    No offense, but what I do and where I post is my business. I'm a member of several horse racing forums, and I try not to cross post the same thing on each of them - because it's very boring for anyone who may read some of the forums I'm on.


Advertisement