Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

If Jupiter became a star ala 2010...

  • 25-12-2006 5:04pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭


    I recently watched 2010 and I began to wonder how our solar system would be effected if Jupiter did gain enough mass to begin nuclear fusion and became a star.

    I know this is close to impossible but it been on my mind for a while and I'd love to know!


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Well it would be a bit brighter I guess! How much more mass would be required I wonder? Enough to suck in the nearest few planets over time?

    Mike.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭The Gnome


    Well apparently anywhere between 75 and 80 times its current mass would make it a Brown Dwarf.

    But we all know they're the worst sort of star that everyone hates. So personally, if it's going to happen, I'd like to be on a larger scale. Nothing with "dwarf" in the word. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    Its hard to say what would happen intact i have no ider, just guessing however i would say that it would have effected the gravitational forces in our solar system to a large degree and effected the orbits of all plants and/moons/passing objects like comets, is assuming that halies comet would be on a different orbit?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,698 ✭✭✭InFront


    Would it have any significance for the earth?

    I mean consider the size of Jupiter with respect to the sun: it's tiny

    If the mass of Jupiter now is 1.899x10^27kgs (just under 318 earths)
    And Jupiter, according to The Gnome, needs at least 75 times more mass to become a star
    Then the minimum required to become a star is 1.42x10^29kgs (23,762 Earths)

    Well the mass of the sun is 1.989x10^30kgs (332, 831 Earths!!)
    And also, remember the Earth is onlu 1au from the Sun and Jupiter is 4au at the best. And becuase retreats in a pattern with respect to the earth, its effect as a star (if any) would probably fluctuate right?

    Still dunno if this would really effect the earth...It would look bigger in the sky of course. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,403 ✭✭✭The Gnome


    User45701 wrote:
    Its hard to say what would happen intact i have no ider, just guessing however i would say that it would have effected the gravitational forces in our solar system to a large degree and effected the orbits of all plants and/moons/passing objects like comets, is assuming that halies comet would be on a different orbit?

    Indeed. I've tried to download orbit simulators and the like but the amount of options are way to much for me to get it working let alone see how the orbits would be effected.
    InFront wrote:
    Would it have any significance for the earth?

    I mean consider the size of Jupiter with respect to the sun: it's tiny

    If the mass of Jupiter now is 1.899x10^27kgs (just under 318 earths)
    And Jupiter, according to The Gnome, needs at least 75 times more mass to become a star
    Then the minimum required to become a star is 1.42x10^29kgs (23,762 Earths)

    Well the mass of the sun is 1.989x10^30kgs (332, 831 Earths!!)
    And also, remember the Earth is onlu 1au from the Sun and Jupiter is 4au at the best. And becuase retreats in a pattern with respect to the earth, its effect as a star (if any) would probably fluctuate right?

    Still dunno if this would really effect the earth...It would look bigger in the sky of course.

    Well as I said 1.42x10^29kgs would make it nothing more than a shoddy brown dwarf so that increase of mass would barely make a difference on a cosmic scale (though it might suck in alot of it's moons).

    To effect I'd say Jupiter will have to get a lot bigger!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 kongs99


    it's not possible for jupiter to become a star even with all the matter in the solar system combine wouldn't even come close to 1/100 the size of the sun. however some dude called andy lloyd claims there is proof that our sun has a binary brown dwarf star outside our solar system. he has a web site called 'dark star'.

    http://www.darkstar1.co.uk/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    Actually i was just thinking.
    Are any of you aware of what happens if you deprive a human from sunlight and clocks for a extended period of time his body clock reverts to something like a 31 hour day. sleep for 8 or 9 and awake for the rest.

    Jupiter as a sun would greatly effect human society because it would be day for a hell of a lot longer also animals and plant life would be greatly effected


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    It would'nt have that much effect though, Sun 93 millions miles, Jupiter 600 million miles, sure it would add light but I'd say it would be like a 20 watt bulb in your living room.

    Mike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭So Glad


    Another way to say, OOOOOOOOHHHHHHH MMMMMMMMMYYYYYYY.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,986 ✭✭✭Red Hand


    User45701 wrote:
    Actually i was just thinking.
    Are any of you aware of what happens if you deprive a human from sunlight and clocks for a extended period of time his body clock reverts to something like a 31 hour day. sleep for 8 or 9 and awake for the rest.

    Really? Where did you find that? What does it suggest? That at some point the earth's rotation was much much slower, therefore days were longer and so we retain this as a genetic memory or something?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,601 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Oddly enough earth rotated faster in the past so the days would have been shorter not longer. Over 400 days from stromatolite evidence.

    Also when the moon was closer tides were much higher than now.

    http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE110.html
    The rate of earth's rotation in the distant past can be measured. Corals produce skeletons with both daily layers and yearly patterns, so we can count the number of days per year when the coral grew. Measurements of fossil corals from 180 to 400 million years ago show year lengths from 381 to 410 days, with older corals showing more days per year


Advertisement