Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transformer Gender Discussion

Options
  • 14-10-2006 6:55pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭


    Galvasean wrote:
    They don't plan to use mass shifting, combiners or fembots or anything else thast requires further explaination. The way the film makers see it is that the general audience will have enough trouble trying to grasp the concept of giant transforming robots without having to explain why one is a woman.

    Hold on - wouldn't the fact that they're all blatantly male(unless they intend in removing their personalities, though movie Prime is still shaped like a burly dude) require a lot more explanation?

    Most people are aware that there's more to gender in an intelligent species than reproduction. Why would an intelligent species(or Primus) create a simulation of life and leave out gender? Doesn't make sense, if you're going for any degree of accuracy - far too many behavioural patterns are tied up in gender. A truly adrogynous species would have the instincts of both genders - which clearly, they don't.

    I think these "Why are there fembots!?" type statements are pretty offensive towards transgenders and gay people too.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,988 ✭✭✭constitutionus


    Rozie wrote:
    Hold on - wouldn't the fact that they're all blatantly male(unless they intend in removing their personalities, though movie Prime is still shaped like a burly dude) require a lot more explanation?

    Most people are aware that there's more to gender in an intelligent species than reproduction. Why would an intelligent species(or Primus) create a simulation of life and leave out gender? Doesn't make sense, if you're going for any degree of accuracy - far too many behavioural patterns are tied up in gender. A truly adrogynous species would have the instincts of both genders - which clearly, they don't.

    I think these "Why are there fembots!?" type statements are pretty offensive towards transgenders and gay people too.


    show me optimus primes wang and I'll agree with you.

    they may be perceived as male but theyre asexual beings. thats one of the things i like about transformers, theyre a totally alien concept in terms of an alien life form. just cause theyre big doesnt mean theyre male, the female spider is vastly bigger and more aggressive than the male for instance and in practically all the dinosaur species the female was bigger. so it not a huge leap to think that an asexual species would be powerfully built.

    at the end of the day fembots is just a dumb response to the feminist lobby. were talking about a silicon based life form that doesnt have sex so female transfromers with tits is ridiculous


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Rozie


    Just because they don't have sex doesn't mean they don't have gender.

    Transformers have no literal need for faces for instance, or noses - yet they have them anyway. Why should fembots be any different?

    They're meant to be modelled after biological life so it's only logical that they'd make a good attempt at emulating all general aspects of it.

    Most of the Transformers acted in ways that were blatantly male. Would Optimus Prime's character have worked as a girl? No. Jazz? Grimlock? Certainly not. Bumblebee and Starscream maybe(mostly because Starscream sounds like a stereotypical witch from some kids' movie), but that's about it.

    Taking that away from them would mean alterring their personalities unnecessarily.

    Plus, without fembots, we'd never have had Blackarachnia either. I hope you're not dissing Blackarachnia. Much of Beast Wars storyline wouldn't have worked if it wasn't for "fembots"...


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    I split this from the movie thread as I felt a discussion about Transformer genders deserved it's own thread.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,685 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    show me optimus primes wang and I'll agree with you.

    Can't find Optimus Prime's wang, but will Megatron do?

    megatron_toy.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    I have nothing against Fembots (this is not an offensive remark, if it is Futurama and Austin Powers should be banned, not that fictional robots will get offended anyway). Infact Arcee was a really cool character in G1 (pity she never got a figure). I'm just saying people would ask the question, "Why is Arcee a girl?" if they saw her in the upcoming movie. (Funny, they wouldn't ask why Prime is a guy)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭de5p0i1er


    In season 2 episode 37(The Search For Alpha Trion) where there were a group of female Autobots.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭6th


    She did look good when she did make it to toy:

    Arcee-energon.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    That gun is a bit large isn't it? Is she over compensating for a lack of something, perhaps?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,510 ✭✭✭sprinkles


    Rozie wrote:
    Hold on - wouldn't the fact that they're all blatantly male(unless they intend in removing their personalities, though movie Prime is still shaped like a burly dude) require a lot more explanation?

    Most people are aware that there's more to gender in an intelligent species than reproduction. Why would an intelligent species(or Primus) create a simulation of life and leave out gender? Doesn't make sense, if you're going for any degree of accuracy - far too many behavioural patterns are tied up in gender. A truly adrogynous species would have the instincts of both genders - which clearly, they don't.

    I think these "Why are there fembots!?" type statements are pretty offensive towards transgenders and gay people too.
    Not all species have female and male genders.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction

    as for mechanical robots I found it very strange that they needed genders. Shurely they are built not born.....

    While on this topic I found it very weird that in some of the english comics that the autobots would sport stubble on thier face to indicate that they were battle weary etc.... wtf?!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭jaggeh


    sprinkles wrote:

    While on this topic I found it very weird that in some of the english comics that the autobots would sport stubble on thier face to indicate that they were battle weary etc.... wtf?!

    Metal Fatigue/rust :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,367 ✭✭✭Agamemnon


    They must be males if there was attraction between them and human females. Wasn't there an episode of the cartoon series called "The Girl Who Loved Powerglide"? And in the comics, Sludge was in love with a reporter babe called Joy Meadows (sounds like a retirement home).

    Very kinky. Anyone know of any fanfic involving Transformer lovin'?


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    agamemnon wrote:
    Very kinky. Anyone know of any fanfic involving Transformer lovin'?
    Oh it's out there... I read one about Optimus Prime anally punishing Ironhide.

    And the latest episode of Drawn Together featured Transformer porn.. although it was only on in the background and you didn't get to see anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 216 ✭✭Belle Ende


    The genderisation of Transformers is a boneheaded idea. Femmebots, indeed. Cuh. A dull and near meritless idea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Well they are robots. Why not build ones with feminine features if they can be advantageous? Female limb proportions allow for greater agility.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 333 ✭✭Ger_Hankey


    Heres why I think there aren't fembots in the movie:
    (conversation which may have happened in Paramount offices)
    Producers:
    "Well, heres our concept designs for Arcee.."
    Michael Bay:
    "Who's Arcee?"
    Producers:
    "Shes the Female Character Robot"
    Micheal Bay
    "Woah, hang on there a sec, wasn't there a girl robot in the original movie?"
    Producers:
    "Well, yes but.."
    Micheal Bay:
    "What did I say?
    Producers:
    "That you want to make your own movie, different from anything thats gone before"
    Micheal Bay:
    "Thats right. So no girl robots. We're making an actoin movie for christs sake, why would we want girls in it?"
    Producers:
    "Wouldn't we be seen as being sexist?"
    Micheal Bay:
    "Nah, just feed em' some crap about having enough to deal with looking at giant transforming robots"
    Producers:
    "Then we would be calling our audience stupid, wouldn't we?"
    Micheal Bay:
    "So? Now, explain to me again, why do I have to have this Optimus Prime dude in it?"


    Evens money Arcee makes it to the sequel


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,082 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    IM SO OFF ENDED AT DIS!!!!onetyone1111


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Rozie


    Belle Ende wrote:
    The genderisation of Transformers is a boneheaded idea. Femmebots, indeed. Cuh. A dull and near meritless idea.

    Why? They were nearly all "genderised" male to begin with... TFs were always meant to be considerably more human-like than all the other aliens in the movie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 216 ✭✭Belle Ende


    Rozie wrote:
    Why?
    Because it's lamebrained and silly. Some desperate need to map most every equivalence (esp. sexual biology) from humans onto the Transformers. Accents and pronouns don't equate to biological categories. Introducing 'female' robots to G1 Transformers probably comes from a fanwank desire to 'be' a fembot/to 'hump' the fembots.
    .
    .


    "What exactly is a female?"
    "As far as I know, Hot Rod, it's some strange gender distinction the humans have." ---UK #234


    Bingo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 333 ✭✭Ger_Hankey


    I'd imagine that this could be determined by which type of origin story they choose to follow. If they go along the sort of lines that the TFs being created by an alien race (e.g. the Quintessons) as a comsumer product, and they wanted them to be more appealing to their customers, then there would be no reason for there not to be female-like TFs.

    In the real world I think its like this: Hasbro wanted to see if they could get some girls interested in buying Transformers, so they put a girl TF in the movie. She wasn't well received, because for the most part, (and ladies, please don't take offense here), girls don't buy Transformers.
    So, twenty years later, Paramount decide to make a movie and are running their ideas past Hasbro (with Arcee in the preliminary story at this stage) and Hasbro say theres no point having her in it cause girls don't buy TFs.
    I seroiusly doubt a couple of strange fanboys sexual fantasies influenced them one way or the other.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Rozie


    Because it's lamebrained and silly. Some desperate need to map most every equivalence (esp. sexual biology) from humans onto the Transformers.

    But it's their human features that make them appeal to us, over, say
    the likes of the Quintessons or all the creepy people in "Webworld".

    You're trying far, far too hard to be "anti-PC" and are ignoring the fact that most of the TFs have blatnatly male voices and personalities(unless you're one of those 70s throwback people that "doesn't believe" in gender psychology/brainsex).
    Introducing 'female' robots to G1 Transformers probably comes from a fanwank desire to 'be' a fembot/to 'hump' the fembots.
    .

    No it doesn't. It came to try to add diversity to characters. Fembots
    were in Transformers from pretty early on.


    Without fembots, we'd never have gotten Blackarachnia. Explain to me, exactly, how Blackarachnia would have worked as a male? It makes no sense.

    Fembots just plain look cool. It doesn't matter if they're pathetic lesbian fantasies, or weird fanboy **** material. That's not really your place to judge.
    "What exactly is a female?"
    "As far as I know, Hot Rod, it's some strange gender distinction the humans have." ---UK #234

    Bingo.

    I hated that. I love Simon Furman's writing but that was just plain
    stupid. Luckily, he's gone back on that nonsense as Arcee appeared in
    DW War and Peace on Cybertron where she wouldn't really be that way
    just because of earth feminists, which would make little sense.

    Keep in mind this was back in the 80s too, feminism was never really "solidified" until around the start of the 90s. So it's not surprising you'd get blows like this at it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,696 Mod ✭✭✭✭Silverfish


    Of course Transformers are all male, as they are big and powerful, as men are. Also, this is why they turn into trucks and planes and cars, not dishwashers and cookers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Actually feminism was silidified in the 1920s when most of the women in the western world got da Vote.

    I never found the transforumers to be a gender issue ffs they are robots
    if the had made "female" transformer and made them **** or made them constantly the bad guys oppps I mean girles then there could be an issue.

    They are robots, they have no gender or gender id or sexual gender preference unless we assign it to them.

    It's all in your mind.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,295 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    rubymegs.jpg
    Yep, the internet sure sprouts out some weird results:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Most people are aware that there's more to gender in an intelligent species than reproduction.
    There's fighting style as well - do Transformers pull each other's hair and grow long nails to scrape each other with? (Let's not discuss those silly animal Transformer yokes...)
    Why would an intelligent species(or Primus) create a simulation of life and leave out gender?
    Probably because most intelligent species are not so wrapped up in such stereotypical nonsense and trivialities.


    Cheerio.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,304 ✭✭✭✭koneko


    Silverfish wrote:
    Of course Transformers are all male, as they are big and powerful, as men are. Also, this is why they turn into trucks and planes and cars, not dishwashers and cookers.

    hi5!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Rozie


    There's fighting style as well - do Transformers pull each other's hair and grow long nails to scrape each other with? (Let's not discuss those silly animal Transformer yokes...)

    Interesting how the people who have a problem with fembots on "Intelligent" grounds are usually chauvenistic assholes.
    Probably because most intelligent species are not so wrapped up in such stereotypical nonsense and trivialities.


    Cheerio.

    Gender isn't just a social construct, it's also defined in the brain. I can't take your "argument" seriously if you continue to ignore this. This really isn't a disputable fact.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    So you are arguing about the gender of fictional robots and how important it is ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭Rozie


    Thaedydal wrote:
    So you are arguing about the gender of fictional robots and how important it is ?

    That sounds like an appeal to ridicule to me.


Advertisement