Bad Beat For Mike The Mouth

lazlo

Just read this over on the Full Tilt forums.

http://pokerforums.fulltiltpoker.com/viewtopic.php?t=17096

Poor Mike thats pretty rough...

Rb

ouch.

phantom_lord

It's already in the bb sticky. Still...ouch...

peeko

never read the Bad Beat sticky before but poped on there last night and read that hand. Woeful luck Mike!

Oodges

Poor mike, He can never catch the breaks.
I actually met him in yosemite national park shortly after the world series this year and he was quite cool. Chatted to me for ages
-(no one else recognised him)
He was wearing a Mike Matusow tshirt but I resisted the temptation
to point out how classless that was..

Lex

Total pot $72,376 | Rake $3

I'm sure he's got a good rake back deal though so he'll be fine!!

Marcom

Don't you get some kind of bad beat bonus for a hand like that?

Perhaps some bad beat insurance.

Hitman Actual

Meh, he just lost to a one-outer on the river, it's not that spectacular. Or is it just the money that has everyone so freaked?

delanec8

lenny_leonard wrote:

Meh, he just lost to a one-outer on the river, it's not that spectacular. Or is it just the money that has everyone so freaked?

Getting one outed with the nut straight for a higher nut straight isnt much of a deal. I think its the fact that it was quads beaten by a straight flush

Duff Man Jr.

Marcom wrote:

Don't you get some kind of bad beat bonus for a hand like that?

If there was a bad beat jackpot, i doubt he'd get 35k from it.

Hitman Actual

delanec8 wrote:

Getting one outed with the nut straight for a higher nut straight isnt much of a deal. I think its the fact that it was quads beaten by a straight flush

Again, meh (favourite word these days). Maybe it's just me, but beats dont really phase me anyway. There was one card he could lose to, it arrived; what about it? Plus the money only went in when he was behind. And the other guy was betting in the hand, not calling.

If he flopped quad kings, and the other guy hit runner-runner Aces for higher quads, all-in on the flop, then it would be different.

RasTa

Yeah if he was playing that hand on party he would of got a nice bad beat jackpot.

kakak1

fcuk him, he's a big mouth

Daithio

delanec8 wrote:

Getting one outed with the nut straight for a higher nut straight isnt much of a deal. I think its the fact that it was quads beaten by a straight flush

I don't see the difference, a one outer is a one outer. It's not really that surprising, I mean the amount of hands Mike M. must play it's bound to happen from time to time. I'm sure he's won plenty of pots hitting one outers himself.

delanec8

Its certainly not surprising. I was just saying that it wasnt the money that people were caught up about. It was the fact that it was quads and a straight flush. There would be no thread if it was a regular one outer( I realise there is no real difference between one outers but if i was to choose to put a one outer beat on someone it would be close to this one:) )

RedXIII

Poor mike! Wouldnt of expected that....mikes alegend, one of my fav players, im suprised he got the quads, he usually has to win with nothing. ..he always gets beat on the river:D