Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

North Korea threatens second bomb

  • 11-10-2006 8:02pm
    #1
    Posts: 0


    NORTH Korea today apparently threatened to explode a second nuclear bomb unless the United States alters its tough stance on sanctions, as the South Korean military prepared for a nuclear conflict with its neighbour.

    A North Korean official warned that the tough sanctions, proposed by the US to the UN Security Council following Monday's nuclear test, would be an act of war.

    "Sanctions are nonsense. If full-scale sanctions take place, we will regard it as a declaration of war," the Beijing-based official is reported as saying. "The more they press us, the stronger our response will be."

    In response to the escalating war of words, South Korea's military was today reported to be checking its readiness for nuclear war.

    Defence Minister Yoon Kwang-ung was looking into the need for improving his troops' capabilities, including introducing state-of-the-art weapons capable of destroying the means of delivering nuclear weapons.

    Earlier, the jitters felt across Asia were underlined by reports of a possible second nuclear explosion.

    Japanese news reports said tremors had been detected that suggested North Korea had conducted another test. A Foreign Ministry official confirmed the government was looking into a possible second blast.

    However, US and South Korean geological monitors said that they had not detected any new seismic activity in communist North Korea, and Japan's prime minister said he had no confirmation of a second blast - a position seconded by the White House.

    And the reports were further contradicted, when North Korea's second in command was reported as saying the decision of whether to carry out further nuclear tests would depend on how the United States treats the country.

    Kim Yong Nam, president of the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly, said that North Korea also considered US policy the main factor for determining whether to return to the stalled six-party talks on its nuclear programme.

    It was not immediately clear whether Kim was threatening to carry out more tests unless Washington changed its policy. Pyongyang is eager for direct talks with the United States, but Washington has refused to meet outside the context of the six-party talks.

    The US has pushed for a partial trade embargo, including strict limits on Korea's profitable weapons exports and freezing of related financial assets. All imports would be inspected too, to filter out materials that could be made into nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

    State-controlled North Korean media denounced sanctions, saying: "Our enemies think they can do something to us through an economic blockade and psychological tricks, but it will turn out to be nothing more than a silly delusion."

    The top US general in South Korea said today that the nuclear test doesn't alter American forces' deterrence against a possible attack by the communist nation.

    "Be assured that the alliance has the forces necessary to deter aggression, and should deterrence fail, decisively defeat any North Korean attack against South Korea," General BB Bell said in a statement to troops.

    "US forces have been well trained to confront nuclear, biological and chemical threats."

    About 29,500 US troops are deployed in the South, a remnant of the 1950-53 Korean War that ended in a cease-fire that has never been replaced by a peace treaty.

    Source: The Scotsman

    Basically, we're all buggered.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    There's a thread in Politics about this!

    I'm scared too, hold me!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,440 ✭✭✭✭Piste


    So much for MAD...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭Binomate


    Trust this shit to happen when Bush is in power. Not saying it's his fault or anything, It's just damn unlucky that there's an idiot in charged when we're on the brink of nuclear war. Worst timing or what? It's almost as if, if you were afraid of flying and the one time you have to go somewhere on a plane, there's a monkey for a pilot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    We're no more on the brink of nuclear war than we were a week ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 944 ✭✭✭Captain Trips


    It's all posturing. His own people have no access to even remotely balanced media at home so this is really for the benefit of the "free" press outside his home country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,480 ✭✭✭projectmayhem


    where the hell are team america?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    *yawn*
    Try your hands at big-people conversation over in Politics; be warned though, you may actually be expected to back up your ill-informed opinions. Le gasp.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement