Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

An obvious question for some

  • 22-08-2006 3:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,735 ✭✭✭


    This will most likely be obvious to some of you "pros" out there so excuse the newbie question.

    I read that a lot of people shoot RAW when outside to be able to PS (or similar) for editing etc.

    I know that when I have taken pics in JPEG I am still able to do a lot of stuff in PS. So why do it in the first place, does RAW allow you to do a lot more??

    Cheers


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭mloc


    http://www.photos-of-the-year.com/raw/

    that explains most of the reasons.

    edit:

    also this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAW_file


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭rymus


    handy link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭elderlemon


    I shoot raw because I make a lot of mistakes :) Raw is how the ccd sees the image so if you screw up something like white belance you can simply correct it later.
    This will most likely be obvious to some of you "pros" out there so excuse the newbie question.

    I read that a lot of people shoot RAW when outside to be able to PS (or similar) for editing etc.

    I know that when I have taken pics in JPEG I am still able to do a lot of stuff in PS. So why do it in the first place, does RAW allow you to do a lot more??

    Cheers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,735 ✭✭✭mikeanywhere


    Thanks for the info so far and the links too :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,817 ✭✭✭✭po0k


    So it makes all the [back-end] image-processing features on the camera effectively useless, replaced by PhotoShop?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    SyxPak wrote:
    So it makes all the [back-end] image-processing features on the camera effectively useless, replaced by PhotoShop?

    Well, no. Most people dont use RAW. Just like the old days really. Most people left the film in with the chemist and couldnt figure out why their results were crap. Serious photographers developed and printed their own stuff. They didn't want to depend on someone else interpreting what the end product should look like. RAW gives a person the same opportunity. It is the digital equivalent of a negative.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,370 ✭✭✭Fionn


    i've only recently started to shoot in RAW format but I find that some photographs i've taken where my settings weren't exactly optimum can be made usable because of the way the RAW format stores all the digital information that was recorded by the sensor when the photograph was taken, thereby allowing me to adjust such things as the exposure, temperature tint and colour settings that would be lost had i shot in JPG format. So it's much more felxible than any format that compresses your photos.


Advertisement