Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

wtf??!!

  • 04-08-2006 11:41pm
    #1
    staringelf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭


    Lars Bonding Takes Pot
    No Limit Hold'em Main Event
    Aug 04, 2006 / 19:28:16 EDT
    On a flop of QQ7, Lars Bonding bet 30K, a player in late position raised to 100K, Bonding reraised all in for 142.7K, and his opponent called. The players showed:

    Lars Bonding AQ
    Opponent ??

    His opponent immediately mucked, claiming that he was drawing dead. There was no turn or river dealt, and Bonding took the pot. After the hand, Bonding had 290K in chips.

    almost collusion like methinks...why did he even pay off the 42k if he was gonna muck???

    EDIT: according to pokerwire he had to have at best A9 with no spade so he couldn't even hit runner runner anything. still odd though...


Comments

  • #2
    delanec8
    Closed Accounts Posts: 474 ✭✭delanec8


    Even with A9 he could catch running aces for a split. The best hand he could have had to be drawing dead was J high. He must have had some kind of runner runner outs but didnt realise and mucked.


  • #3
    staringelf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭staringelf


    delanec8 wrote:
    Even with A9 he could catch running aces for a split. The best hand he could have had to be drawing dead was J high. He must have had some kind of runner runner outs but didnt realise and mucked.


    yeah, you're right....such a strange thing to do:confused:


  • #4
    willis
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭willis


    Anybody think there should be rule for this?


  • #5
    Hitman Actual
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭Hitman Actual


    willis wrote:
    Anybody think there should be rule for this?

    It would be hard considering he mucked (assuming his cards actually did hit the "muck").


Advertisement