Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Multi Party - Web Video Conference

  • 25-07-2006 11:47am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 647 ✭✭✭


    Hi Guys

    Really looking for your collective help on this one.

    Every week I take part in a 3 hour web conference with our offices in Chicagco and California

    We have been using a system called www.sightspeed.com

    For one on one conversations the system is just about OK (little laggy on video / sound timing etc but managable), however when all three offices team conference at the one time, the quality is not great and it will probably drop connections a couple of times.

    We are all on decent broadband with good upload speeds and we all spent money on decent web cameras and head sets.

    So my questions, what other systems have other people used and who would they recommend?

    Cheers
    Fintan


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭SouperComputer


    iChat AV is great, although Mac only :(

    What has google turned up for you? Also, your bandwith may be big, but the latency is also very important for quality. This appiles to all the clients, so if one has bad latency it may fudge up the whole lot!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 647 ✭✭✭fintan


    Im afraid we are all on windows

    google has turned up very little, just lots of ads for web cameras.

    I will look for some sort of latency test and take it from there i suppose.


Advertisement