Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Problem with sql parameter with c#

  • 20-06-2006 2:56pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭


    Hi I have a sql parameter that takes as input the value of a dropdownlist, the problem I am having is that it works fine for one insrance but if I try it for a second time (in the same session) then I get the following error.

    "The variable name '@comp' has already been declared. Variable names must be unique within a query batch or stored procedure."

    Below is my code,
            string com = DropDownList1.SelectedValue.ToString();
            
            Parameter company = new Parameter("comp", TypeCode.String, com);
            SqlDataSource2.SelectParameters.Add(company);
                    
            SqlDataSource2.SelectCommand = "SELECT * FROM [Product] WHERE   Customer = @comp "; 
            GridView1.DataBind(); 
    

    Anybody got any suggestions?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭JuncoPartner


    Hey man, have you tried just changing the param value...
    So in the code create the param and then on the selected index change or whatever event your code gets triggered by just change its value there instead of trying to create it again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭WizZard


    Your code could check if the parameter exists before creating it, and if it exists then just assign the new value to it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    but if I try it for a second time (in the same session) then I get the following error.
    ...
    Anybody got any suggestions?

    Sounds like your variable is non-local and not being re-initialised between setups.

    There's a number of ways of fixing this, but basically it looks like your variable persists between calls, while the "setup" code assumes it doesn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭JuncoPartner


    bonkey wrote:
    Sounds like your variable is non-local and not being re-initialised between setups.

    There's a number of ways of fixing this, but basically it looks like your variable persists between calls, while the "setup" code assumes it doesn't.

    I love this guy!

    What a useful post.
    Your code is broken. It can be fixed.

    Anyway back to the point, have you tried the suggested solutions posted above?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    I love this guy!

    Thank you, thank you I'm here all week.
    What a useful post.
    Your code is broken. It can be fixed.
    You forgot to notice (or mention) that I also mentioned why it is most probably broken.

    If you understand why something is broken, you can figure out how to fix it and learn from your mistake.
    If you simply copy someone else's correction, you learn how to copy and paste another piece of code.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,468 ✭✭✭Evil Phil


    bonkey wrote:
    Thank you, thank you I'm here all week.

    rofl.

    Anyway, as bonkey said you're variable is persisting between calls. Perhaps in a control or something.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,035 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    It's a sqldatasource presumably declared on the aspx page in the html. This means the first time is fine but since most controls store their state in the viewstate then when you add the parameter it's going in on top of the already existing parameter that has been pulled from the viewstate.
    The first question I would ask is why you are doing it in code when the sql datasource can be set to do this in the aspx page's html very easily. If you must do it in code then setting enableviewstate for the sqldatasource to false should solve the problem but if you have other controls on the page posting back it may lead to problems so you could instead remove all parameters from the sqldatasource before adding the new one - "SqlDataSource2.SelectParameters.Clear" which relys on the fact that it has already pulled the parameter from the viewstate. I'm not sure which would happen first.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭Mutant_Fruit


    The first question I would ask is why you are doing it in code when the sql datasource can be set to do this in the aspx page's html very easily.
    Keeping code away from your HTML is a good thing. It's why you write your C# in the .CS file and your html in the .aspx file.
    If you must do it in code then setting enableviewstate for the sqldatasource to false should solve the problem but if you have other controls on the page posting back it may lead to problems so you could instead remove all parameters from the sqldatasource before adding the new one - "SqlDataSource2.SelectParameters.Clear" which relys on the fact that it has already pulled the parameter from the viewstate. I'm not sure which would happen first.
    When a page "posts back" to the server, the very first thing that happens is the page gets processed. i.e. viewstate gets loaded in, control positions get updated etc. When it starts running your C# code, you can be sure the page has all the viewstate data loaded (unless you've overridden something or hooked into some specific events).

    Also, you can safely disable viewstate for specific controls without messing up other controls. i.e. disabling viewstate for DropDownList1 won't affect DropDownList2. So disabling viewstate on controls that don't need it can be a good thing as less useless data is retained in the viewstate.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,035 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    Keeping code away from your HTML is a good thing. It's why you write your C# in the .CS file and your html in the .aspx file.

    Eh folks anyone used the dot net 2 controls???? Where did I say to put the code in the html? What I'm referring to results in no code whatsoever. It's all in the sqldatasource control declaration within the aspx page.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,035 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    Also, you can safely disable viewstate for specific controls without messing up other controls. i.e. disabling viewstate for DropDownList1 won't affect DropDownList2. So disabling viewstate on controls that don't need it can be a good thing as less useless data is retained in the viewstate.

    If your sqldatasource is being bound to a gridview for example then disabling the viewstate for the sqldatasource may cause editing/sorting etc. on the gridview to stop working.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,035 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    Example with sqldatasource control:-
    <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource2" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnString %>"
                SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Product] WHERE   Customer = @comp">
                <SelectParameters>
                    <asp:ControlParameter ControlID="DropDownList1" Name="comp" PropertyName="SelectedValue" />
                </SelectParameters>
            </asp:SqlDataSource>
    


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭Mutant_Fruit


    If your sqldatasource is being bound to a gridview for example then disabling the viewstate for the sqldatasource may cause editing/sorting etc. on the gridview to stop working.
    Well, that should be obvious. How can you databind to data that isn't there. I suppose i misunderstood what you meant by "if you have other controls on the page posting back it may lead to problems". I thought you meant that if you disable the viewstate (on the control), it would adversely affect all other controls that have viewstate/postback.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,035 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    Yes what I meant was that the OP appeared to be running that code on the postback of the dropdownlist. If other buttons or dropdownlists are posting back he may have problems with viewstate off.


Advertisement