Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Experiment to show F is proportional to a

  • 23-05-2006 7:11pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7


    Experiment from my physics book:


    **-
    ****-
    *******-
    *********o
    ************-
    ***************-
    ___________________ =
    ............................. / \
    .............................____


    This 'diagram' is supposed to show a friction-compensating slope with a trolley on it. The trolley is connected by string to a thing with weights in it at the bottom. The more weights placed in the thing, the more the trolley accelerates. Using a ticker tape timer, the acceleration for each force was found.
    What's puzzling me though is that it says that the weights are transferred between the trolley and the thing (I can't think of the name), in order to keep the mass of the system constant.
    But surely the trolley is the mass that is being accelerated and it's mass should be constant, and weights are just put on/taken off the thing. No?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,618 ✭✭✭Civilian_Target


    The trolley should be of constant weight. You're trying to prove F prop. a, so the third factor, mass should be constant. In this case, more weight on the pulley system will increase the pulling Force, not any system mass.

    You can measure it with different masses on the trolley and compensate, of course, but it seems like a strange way of doing things. Have you mentioned this to your teacher?

    BTW, if it's an "acceleration due to gravity" experiment, then what's being done could potentially be correct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭JoseJones


    because F=ma, mass must be kept constant in order to prove F proportional to a. This mass refers to the mass of the whole system, ie: the trolley, string and scale pan. Remember, the whole system is being accelerated, so transferring mass from one part of the system to the other doesn't change the overall mass, if you have .25kg on the trolley, and .25kg on the scale pan, and then move .1kg from the trolley to the pan, you now have .15kg on the trolley and .35kg on the pan. This means the overall mass is still .5kg, but the system's acceleration will increase.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,155 ✭✭✭SOL


    it really doesn't matter how much each weighs as long as you know how much it weighs because when you come back to your F=ma question you will just be putting in your known values for f and m and get the same a each time, f against m on a graph would have a slope a...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 612 ✭✭✭JoseJones


    but your not graphing F against M, your investigating if F prop. a. that's why m must be constant. F goes on the X axis, a on the Y axis, and the slope=1/m


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 JakeTheMsitake


    Can it be classed as an exernal force then? :confused:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement