Locosexuals

Transport21 Fan

popebenny16 wrote:

There's a few on IRN doing it but even there its half hearted.

But hasn't it been moving and beautiful to watch. Like Brokeback Mountain with anoraks and notebooks.

John R

Transport21 Fan wrote:

But hasn't it been moving and beautiful to watch. Like Brokeback Mountain with anoraks and notebooks.

Jealous tommy? Considering how much you go on about trainspotters it is the logical conclusion. Did they spurn your advances one cold morning on Limerick Junction platform 2?

jd

But wasn't Tommy once a trainspotter. There is nothing more puritanical thab a reformed sinner!

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/narrow_gauge/pix.html

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/car/IE/pix.html

Victor

Ok, I can understand the frustration, but can people tone back the harsh language.

And leave Thomas alone, he's not one of them trainspotters, he's a locosexual.

popebenny16

jd wrote:

But wasn't Tommy once a trainspotter. There is nothing more puritanical thab a reformed sinner!

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/narrow_gauge/pix.html

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/car/IE/pix.html

OHMYGOD!!!!

I feel like JD in Scrubs after discovering that Dr Cox was a fraud all along!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And he's from Ballymun and all!!!

Transport21 Fan

Yikes even I had forgotton about that. I feel like like Fr Micheal Cleary without the cabret singing.

There is obviously a trainspotter/CIE union/homosexual/catholic clergy/MI5 plot out to get me. However, I have been exposed. Fair cop. But I swear I have changed since then. I only take pictures of metros, subways now.

I swear to god I never had an anorak and notebook. Oh wait, I did.

Bye all and good luck.

popebenny16

I only take pictures of metros, subways now.

Actually, i have some rather intersting photos of "trains" entering and leaving "tunnels", and some of "locomotives" with their "engine covers" off, if you're interested.

In some of them, you can see the, erm, exhaust..............

........and some steamers as well..................

jd

he's gone..
he foretold his exposure- he had that signature a few days ago!!:eek:

Transport21 Fan wrote:

Post No. 333 will be my final post to this boards.ie

popebenny16

and he with 333 posts...................... that's half of 666!!!

You dont think...................





that








by tomorrow if he gets into an argument with someone who backs the train drivers that he'll get up to 666???

:eek:

BuffyBot

He'll be back, with ID number 4. They're always back.

paulm17781

popebenny16 wrote:

Actually, i have some rather intersting photos of "trains" entering and leaving "tunnels", and some of "locomotives" with their "engine covers" off, if you're interested.

In some of them, you can see the, erm, exhaust..............

........and some steamers as well..................

You are a strange, strange boy.

popebenny16

Paul.........................

would you like to see my train set?

It's a HORNby..............

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

You are a strange, strange boy.

Tom and himself are getting married..

popebenny16

He'll be back, with ID number 4. They're always back.

How do you know it hasnt already?

:cool: :cool:

paulm17781

jd wrote:

Tom and himself are getting married..

Aah diddums. You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay. Tell me, are you 8? If not you have some growing up to do.

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

Aah diddums. You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay. Tell me, are you 8? If not you have some growing up to do.

I didn't start the fetishtic tone here...:)
Bit older than 8-and abit older than you too sonny boy ..

paulm17781

jd wrote:

I didn't start the fetishtic tone here...:)
Bit older than 8-and abit older than you too sonnie boy..

Mummy mummy he started it! As I said, if you're older than 8 act it.

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

Mummy mummy he started it! As I said, if you're older than 8 act it.

Gee- you are an awful pompous pr**ck. The comment was a bit silly, but get off your high horse.

paulm17781

jd wrote:

Gee- you are an awful pompous pr**ck. The comment was a bit silly, but get off your high horse.

Point proven. You lose an argument, you insult someone.

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

Point proven. You lose an argument, you insult someone.

Sorry Paul- you started the insults here.

Tell me, are you 8? If not you have some growing up to do.

And as for arguing -"You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay"

I can't see where i was arguing with them..

popebenny16

JD and Paul, you are very naughty boys!

I see you in my room.................

paulm17781

jd wrote:

Sorry Paul- you started the insults here.

Read: I'm telling mummy you started it. :rolleyes:

And as for arguing -"You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay"

I can't see where i was arguing with them..

Excellent point, I take it back that you were childish now. :rolleyes:

jd

Paul- this is nonsensical. I make a post which is rather silly (as are a few posts in this thread) and you insult me. If you had said the post was rather silly I would have agreed , and removed it. However to accuse me of being childish, and having some "growing up to do" on the basis of 5 or so words is rather silly.

paulm17781

Now that is more like an adult.

I did not insult you, I asked are you 8 as calling someone who disagrees with your ideology gay is childish.

When it was pointed out to you that this is childish, you said they started it. When it was pointed out that this was childish, you decided to resort to insults. Only two more times of being told how childish this was and you posted an intelligent reply, which still implies this is someone else's fault but that is not the point.

The question is, in future debates will you actually discuss things with people or just insult them when you have nothing intelligent to say?

I'm off before my sexuallity gets challenged. I'll leave the rest to you.

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

Now that is more like an adult.

I did not insult you, I asked are you 8 as calling someone who disagrees with your ideology gay is childish.

When it was pointed out to you that this is childish, you said they started it. When it was pointed out that this was childish, you decided to resort to insults. Only two more times of being told how childish this was and you posted an intelligent reply, which still implies this is someone else's fault but that is not the point.

The question is, in future debates will you actually discuss things with people or just insult them when you have nothing intelligent to say?

I'm off before my sexuallity gets challenged. I'll leave the rest to you.

oK pAUL-I have been around the block a few times so the patronising tone is a bit much.
Look back over the thread - the comment I made had nothing to do with anybody's ideology (I don't know how you inferred this, nor can I see where my ideology was mentioned) - it stemmed from a joke about trainspotters and developed from there.
I doubt any rational person could think that I implied either Benny or Tom are gay (not that I'd care whether they are or not) .

And as for discussing things with people-I have done plenty of it on boards.

paulm17781

Fiar enough. You keep arguing rather than just admitting you made a mistake, that says it all to me. I'm tired of this so I'll only reply to you if you direct a comment to me.

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

Fiar enough. You keep arguing rather than just admitting you made a mistake, that says it all to me. I'm tired of this so I'll only reply to you if you direct a comment to me.

Paul
Paul, I already agreed the comment was a bit silly. The motives you attributed to me had no basis in fact nor could ber inferred from what I had written.

paulm17781

You're right, you weren't arguing with them. They just happen to be the two who were most vocally anti-CIE union and you happened to pick them. I mistook this for motive.

The funny this was you still had a go at me for arguing with you, which was my original accusation.

jd

paulm17781 wrote:

You're right, you weren't arguing with them. They just happen to be the two who were most vocally anti-CIE union and you happened to pick them. I mistook this for motive.

The funny this was you still had a go at me for arguing with you, which was my original accusation.

Paul,
I have no problem with anybody arguing with me, and never have-it keeps life interesting. I was annoyed with the ad hominem reply, and ok the retort was a bit over the top, but so was your original responde.
I guess Victor will split these posts off to the Thunderdome anyways...

popebenny16

ad hominem

Now you're just using dirty talk!

Navan Junction

Mod - Delete from message 13 onwards..

Let's have a proper debate on loco lovers without insults and in the interests of good fun..

T21 fan - respond... Nothing wrong with trains at all - some day I hope to see a real one in Navan (that carries passengers)!

popebenny16

Actually NJ, instead of deleating he gave us a thread!!!!

So, nj, are you grade seperated or double tracked?

Navan Junction

popebenny16 wrote:

So, nj, are you grade seperated or double tracked?

Well, if you read between the lines you will see I'm loco-motionally disfunctional, with off track tendencies and affected by acute infrastructure deficiency and showing mild symptoms of repetitive announcements strain.

I have not however reached the 74 mile point yet...!

I have to say the start of this thread was very entertaining..

And you your eminence?

popebenny16

Well, I branch off a lot, wear lots of white and somehow find the words "de deitrich" filty.

SeanW

Question: why is this stickied?

Metrobest

I've never read such a load of nonsense in my life. Why is the thread stickied? It's not ironic, it's just stupid.

Transport 21 Fan must please return to the forum, even if under a new pseudonym. His contributions of late have been insightful, hilarious, and frequently both. His departure is regretted.

corktina

Metrobest wrote:

I've never read such a load of nonsense in my life. Why is the thread stickied? It's not ironic, it's just stupid.

Transport 21 Fan must please return to the forum, even if under a new pseudonym. His contributions of late have been insightful, hilarious, and frequently both. His departure is regretted.

hear hear......i frequently disagreed with 21 but always enjoyed his posts.....

jd

Paul and I sorted out our misunderstanding off thread. This sticky serves no purpose..

dowlingm

Why on earth was this stickyed?

tklemonade

Stickied? Might be because the "lock" and "sticky" option are close together....

It could be a mistake!

popebenny16

Well, I've gone all sticky, if that's any help.....................

............and now you all hate it, it has given me un-natural acceleration!!!

craigybagel

Sorry to drag all this up again but i just found this and couldnt resist............
http://www.railchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=1081

SeanW

>_< And here was me thinking this whole miserable excuse for a debate had become "life-expired" Oh well.

lostexpectation

i wonder how many people have had sex on the dart?

BendiBus

lostexpectation wrote:

i wonder how many people have had sex on the dart?

Obviously no locosexuals have - they're all virgins

dermo88

Was there a character in Thomas the Tank Engine called George.

I reckon hes got some locosexual fans, I guess you could call them steamers.

popebenny16

We already had Steamers, Dermo, have to do better than that.

Yes, some of us have actually coupled in real life, bendi.

Actully, o/t (there's a topic?!!!) Has anyone here actually listened to an episode of Thomas the Tank? They all hate each other, and they always row!!!

Very realistic.