Locosexuals

Transport21 Fan · 16-05-2006 7:31pm #1

popebenny16 wrote:

There's a few on IRN doing it but even there its half hearted.

But hasn't it been moving and beautiful to watch. Like Brokeback Mountain with anoraks and notebooks.

John R · 16-05-2006 7:44pm

Transport21 Fan wrote:

But hasn't it been moving and beautiful to watch. Like Brokeback Mountain with anoraks and notebooks.

Jealous tommy? Considering how much you go on about trainspotters it is the logical conclusion. Did they spurn your advances one cold morning on Limerick Junction platform 2?

jd · 16-05-2006 7:58pm

But wasn't Tommy once a trainspotter. There is nothing more puritanical thab a reformed sinner!

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/narrow_gauge/pix.html

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/car/IE/pix.html

Victor · 16-05-2006 10:50pm

Ok, I can understand the frustration, but can people tone back the harsh language.

And leave Thomas alone, he's not one of them trainspotters, he's a locosexual.

popebenny16 · 16-05-2006 11:03pm

jd wrote:

But wasn't Tommy once a trainspotter. There is nothing more puritanical thab a reformed sinner!

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/narrow_gauge/pix.html

http://www.railfaneurope.net/pix/ie/car/IE/pix.html

OHMYGOD!!!!

I feel like JD in Scrubs after discovering that Dr Cox was a fraud all along!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And he's from Ballymun and all!!!

Transport21 Fan · 17-05-2006 12:03am

Yikes even I had forgotton about that. I feel like like Fr Micheal Cleary without the cabret singing.

There is obviously a trainspotter/CIE union/homosexual/catholic clergy/MI5 plot out to get me. However, I have been exposed. Fair cop. But I swear I have changed since then. I only take pictures of metros, subways now.

I swear to god I never had an anorak and notebook. Oh wait, I did.

Bye all and good luck.

popebenny16 · 17-05-2006 12:17am

I only take pictures of metros, subways now.

Actually, i have some rather intersting photos of "trains" entering and leaving "tunnels", and some of "locomotives" with their "engine covers" off, if you're interested.

In some of them, you can see the, erm, exhaust..............

........and some steamers as well..................

jd · 17-05-2006 12:19am

he's gone..
he foretold his exposure- he had that signature a few days ago!!:eek:

Transport21 Fan wrote:

Post No. 333 will be my final post to this boards.ie

popebenny16 · 17-05-2006 12:31am

and he with 333 posts...................... that's half of 666!!!

You dont think...................

that

by tomorrow if he gets into an argument with someone who backs the train drivers that he'll get up to 666???

:eek:

BuffyBot · 17-05-2006 1:19am

He'll be back, with ID number 4. They're always back.

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 9:25am

popebenny16 wrote:

Actually, i have some rather intersting photos of "trains" entering and leaving "tunnels", and some of "locomotives" with their "engine covers" off, if you're interested.

In some of them, you can see the, erm, exhaust..............

........and some steamers as well..................

You are a strange, strange boy.

popebenny16 · 17-05-2006 10:53am

Paul.........................

would you like to see my train set?

It's a HORNby..............

jd · 17-05-2006 10:56am

paulm17781 wrote:

You are a strange, strange boy.

Tom and himself are getting married..

popebenny16 · 17-05-2006 11:07am

He'll be back, with ID number 4. They're always back.

How do you know it hasnt already?

:cool: :cool:

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 11:08am

jd wrote:

Tom and himself are getting married..

Aah diddums. You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay. Tell me, are you 8? If not you have some growing up to do.

jd · 17-05-2006 11:57am

paulm17781 wrote:

Aah diddums. You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay. Tell me, are you 8? If not you have some growing up to do.

I didn't start the fetishtic tone here...:)
Bit older than 8-and abit older than you too sonny boy

..

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 12:26pm

jd wrote:

I didn't start the fetishtic tone here...:)
Bit older than 8-and abit older than you too sonnie boy..

Mummy mummy he started it! As I said, if you're older than 8 act it.

jd · 17-05-2006 12:28pm

paulm17781 wrote:

Mummy mummy he started it! As I said, if you're older than 8 act it.

Gee- you are an awful pompous pr**ck. The comment was a bit silly, but get off your high horse.

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 12:39pm

jd wrote:

Gee- you are an awful pompous pr**ck. The comment was a bit silly, but get off your high horse.

Point proven. You lose an argument, you insult someone.

jd · 17-05-2006 12:40pm

paulm17781 wrote:

Point proven. You lose an argument, you insult someone.

Sorry Paul- you started the insults here.

Tell me, are you 8? If not you have some growing up to do.

And as for arguing -"You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay"

I can't see where i was arguing with them..

popebenny16 · 17-05-2006 1:07pm

JD and Paul, you are very naughty boys!

I see you in my room.................

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 1:34pm

jd wrote:

Sorry Paul- you started the insults here.

Read: I'm telling mummy you started it. :rolleyes:

And as for arguing -"You can't beat him or Thomas S in this argument so you call them both gay"

I can't see where i was arguing with them..

Excellent point, I take it back that you were childish now. :rolleyes:

jd · 17-05-2006 2:18pm

Paul- this is nonsensical. I make a post which is rather silly (as are a few posts in this thread) and you insult me. If you had said the post was rather silly I would have agreed , and removed it. However to accuse me of being childish, and having some "growing up to do" on the basis of 5 or so words is rather silly.

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 2:46pm

Now that is more like an adult.

I did not insult you, I asked are you 8 as calling someone who disagrees with your ideology gay is childish.

When it was pointed out to you that this is childish, you said they started it. When it was pointed out that this was childish, you decided to resort to insults. Only two more times of being told how childish this was and you posted an intelligent reply, which still implies this is someone else's fault but that is not the point.

The question is, in future debates will you actually discuss things with people or just insult them when you have nothing intelligent to say?

I'm off before my sexuallity gets challenged. I'll leave the rest to you.

jd · 17-05-2006 3:02pm

paulm17781 wrote:

Now that is more like an adult.

I did not insult you, I asked are you 8 as calling someone who disagrees with your ideology gay is childish.

When it was pointed out to you that this is childish, you said they started it. When it was pointed out that this was childish, you decided to resort to insults. Only two more times of being told how childish this was and you posted an intelligent reply, which still implies this is someone else's fault but that is not the point.

The question is, in future debates will you actually discuss things with people or just insult them when you have nothing intelligent to say?

I'm off before my sexuallity gets challenged. I'll leave the rest to you.

oK pAUL-I have been around the block a few times so the patronising tone is a bit much.
Look back over the thread - the comment I made had nothing to do with anybody's ideology (I don't know how you inferred this, nor can I see where my ideology was mentioned) - it stemmed from a joke about trainspotters and developed from there.
I doubt any rational person could think that I implied either Benny or Tom are gay (not that I'd care whether they are or not) .

And as for discussing things with people-I have done plenty of it on boards.

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 3:31pm

Fiar enough. You keep arguing rather than just admitting you made a mistake, that says it all to me. I'm tired of this so I'll only reply to you if you direct a comment to me.

jd · 17-05-2006 3:37pm

paulm17781 wrote:

Fiar enough. You keep arguing rather than just admitting you made a mistake, that says it all to me. I'm tired of this so I'll only reply to you if you direct a comment to me.

Paul
Paul, I already agreed the comment was a bit silly. The motives you attributed to me had no basis in fact nor could ber inferred from what I had written.

paulm17781 · 17-05-2006 3:55pm

You're right, you weren't arguing with them. They just happen to be the two who were most vocally anti-CIE union and you happened to pick them. I mistook this for motive.

The funny this was you still had a go at me for arguing with you, which was my original accusation.

jd · 17-05-2006 4:01pm

paulm17781 wrote:

You're right, you weren't arguing with them. They just happen to be the two who were most vocally anti-CIE union and you happened to pick them. I mistook this for motive.

The funny this was you still had a go at me for arguing with you, which was my original accusation.

Paul,
I have no problem with anybody arguing with me, and never have-it keeps life interesting. I was annoyed with the ad hominem reply, and ok the retort was a bit over the top, but so was your original responde.
I guess Victor will split these posts off to the Thunderdome anyways...

popebenny16 · 17-05-2006 4:56pm

ad hominem

Now you're just using dirty talk!

Navan Junction · 17-05-2006 9:03pm

Mod - Delete from message 13 onwards..

Let's have a proper debate on loco lovers without insults and in the interests of good fun..

T21 fan - respond... Nothing wrong with trains at all - some day I hope to see a real one in Navan (that carries passengers)!

Locosexuals

Comments