Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

JJ in the SB

  • 18-04-2006 10:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭


    UTG limps, CO limps, then it's folded around to me in the SB. This means nothing. They probably have two suited cards, one of them a K or Q, the other a card 6-T. I know that at least 1 player will call a raise of 3/4 BBs regardless and I will be left out in the cold OOP.

    Stacks (very roughly)
    UTG:1500
    CO:2000
    Me:3000
    BB:2000

    EDIT: Well spotted Walko! Blinds are a mere 30/60 (level 2)
    What's the plan here?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 169 ✭✭Wallko


    wat are the blinds?? kind of important!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    Make it 300 to go. Bet 3/4 of the pot on any flop, and fold if raised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭breadmonkey


    OK, that seems standard enough. As it turns out, I fired it all in because I was so angry at a sick beat I had just received at another table. I would be surprised if anyone can guess what the CO called with (or if anyone cares).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    84o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,047 ✭✭✭Culchie


    I don't know if this an STT or MTT or the stakes/standard ...

    But if an MTT, considering the small size of blinds, anyone like a smooth call here OOP, and make a few chips on a low flop ?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 969 ✭✭✭sunzz


    Horrible play limping here culchie if he limps then the bb will also limp for value, 3 people against jacks is horrible horrible. flop of anything and you dont have a clue where you are.

    Could come any draw any over cards, 2 pairs hitting etc etc

    REGARDLESS of the flop people get married 2 pairs of face card. Raise it bet out on flop, if raised lay it down u have no info on the people playing.

    Roundtowers suggestion is pefrect.

    Im a say he called with AK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,047 ✭✭✭Culchie


    I dunno Sunzz, depends on read of opponents, but I'm not falling in love with JJ in the small blind here, and can let this hand go should it receive heat very easily.

    So we go with the suggested raise to 300, 10% of our stack, 15-20% of any callers.

    So we get say one caller (pot of 720), and an overcard (maybe 2) hits, a very probable scenario.... .... are we betting the flop... 3/4 pot, another 600? If we check and villian bets the flop representing the overcards, do we call? ....I don't like the hole we're digging here OOP

    Just my thoughts


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭kpnuts


    I agree with Culchie on this one, I don't like building pots with medium pairs OOP. Let's see a flop and take it from there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    TBH I disagree with limping in this scenario, just because the blinds (although small) your stack just isn't deep enough to limp. If you limp you are basically playing it for set value or trying to win a small pot un.improved. If the stacks were deeper then I'd like the limp the odd time, but here I think the optimal play is to raise it up to 5/6BB's and take it from there. You don't have to make a continuation bet on the flop, but just see what the flop brings, what you think your opponent will do (if he missed or if he connected) and react accordingly.

    I'm not saying there's anything wrong with limping, (but then just play the hand the same way you would with 77 - 99, however with these stack sizes I'd raise about 75% of the time here, Villain players dependant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,047 ✭✭✭Culchie


    Ste05 wrote:
    TBH I disagree with limping in this scenario, just because the blinds (although small) your stack just isn't deep enough to limp. If you limp you are basically playing it for set value or trying to win a small pot un.improved. If the stacks were deeper then I'd like the limp the odd time, but here I think the optimal play is to raise it up to 5/6BB's and take it from there. You don't have to make a continuation bet on the flop, but just see what the flop brings, what you think your opponent will do (if he missed or if he connected) and react accordingly.

    I'm not saying there's anything wrong with limping, (but then just play the hand the same way you would with 77 - 99, however with these stack sizes I'd raise about 75% of the time here, Villain players dependant.

    Just me being stubborn, but I prefer the limp so much more than the raise.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    Culchie wrote:
    Just me being stubborn, but I prefer the limp so much more than the raise.
    LOL, :D Culchie you stubborn mule,:p I thought you felt quite strongly about it alright. Limp away my good man ... I'll go down in a blaze of chips shouting and cursing when K5o beats my JJ :mad: (he'll still call all the way to the river until he hits his miracle card you know :rolleyes: ), while Mr. Culchie, et al, plays it safe and survives... to pick up a nice money finish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Bp!


    Culchie wrote:
    Just me being stubborn, but I prefer the limp so much more than the raise.

    I tend to agree with Culchie here, these blinds are so low theres not a huge need to build the pot OOP. if the blinds were 50/100 or esp 100/200 i think it has to be played much more aggressive but with only 30/60 blinds im happy to play the hand as if i have nothing

    Roundtower just out of interest how would you play AQ in this position at these blinds?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Norwich Fan Rob


    not sure about JJ but id defo limp AQ in this scenario with those blinds.
    JJ i could limp, i could raise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    Bp! wrote:
    I tend to agree with Culchie here, these blinds are so low theres not a huge need to build the pot OOP. if the blinds were 50/100 or esp 100/200 i think it has to be played much more aggressive but with only 30/60 blinds im happy to play the hand as if i have nothing

    Roundtower just out of interest how would you play AQ in this position at these blinds?

    I would limp AQo here. Might raise AQs and would almost always raise AK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    Raise Raise Raise Raise - u have a monster. Overpairs are great. Pushing preflop is better than limping


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 868 ✭✭✭brianmc


    Raise Raise Raise Raise - u have a monster. Overpairs are great. Pushing preflop is better than limping


    I'd like to see this discussed on a stage "hustings" style. Culchie versus HectorJelly.

    It'd be interesting for the content too - not just the entertainment value of a good row.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭breadmonkey


    Sorry for the bump, my interent connection has been down for the last few days.

    CO called with Kh2h if anyone cares. Figure that one out!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    flat calling JJ here is AWFUL - 4 handed and you have a premium hand. Raising 99 here would be marginal, but limping JJ gives up a tonne of equity. The arguments for limping are basically that at some point you might have to play poker.


Advertisement