Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Constructionist approach

  • 11-04-2006 9:07pm
    #1
    TheVan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 738 ✭✭✭


    Stupid question it may seem but I'd love a definitive answer...

    What is a constructionist approach judicially?

    Basically I'm studying charges over book debts at the moment and basically I am being asked to look that the constructionist approach of the courts in cases such as Holidair, Wogans, New Bullas, Spectrum etc...

    so what exactly is meant by this. I have a vague idea but want to get it right!


Comments

  • #2
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    :eek:

    Think I have an essay somewhere on postmodernism and deconstructive theory in law...maybe taking it and completely reversing it, putting a 'NOT' after every assertion, might do...:confused:;)


  • #3
    mountainyman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,268 ✭✭✭mountainyman


    It means deliberately avoiding intentionality in interpreting constitutional and statutory texts.

    not finding unenumerated rights and so on,


Advertisement