Pros and cons of the editor (fm2006)

blu_sonic · 24-03-2006 5:16am #1

i edited the whole EL/ELD1 i made it as "glamourous" as the EPL and gave all the teams 50+mil i did it evenly upped the stadiums attendence etc. i've won the league with shamrock rovers i know its a hollow victory but it makes the game far more playable i was wondering if anyone else has used the editor in such a manner?

MrJoeSoap · 26-03-2006 5:38pm

Not me, don't see the point. I'd prefer to try and drag the teams up with my incredible management

anonymous_joe · 27-03-2006 11:08am

Fun is still important, so Sonic makes sense. Do the players get better when you up League Rep? Or is quality poor?

MrJoeSoap · 27-03-2006 2:51pm

I've had plenty of fun!

blu_sonic · 27-03-2006 2:59pm

anonymous_joe wrote:

Fun is still important, so Sonic makes sense. Do the players get better when you up League Rep? Or is quality poor?

Your coaches get better, the players stay the same, which sucks but you have the ability to attract players. the likes of ronaldo, henry or the high roller players won't come to you but you'll get good championship or medium prem players

Pros and cons of the editor (fm2006)

Comments