Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

RedHat Cert

  • 20-03-2006 08:54PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29


    RHCT or RHCE certification does it still hold a credibility when they are so many different distros out their e.g (Suse,Knopix, Ubuntu .....etc ) as it only focuses on Red Hat only...or is it just a benchmarking criteria in the academic world ....

    What value does it hold ?
    How acceptable is it ?

    Linux is based on Open source so why such a notion of credibility required ?
    ________________________________________________________________
    RedHat Path

    You sit for your RHCT ---> RHCE --->Qualified Linux Engineer.

    New version release follow upgrade path RHCE (AS4)--->Upgrade (RHCT expired


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 lexeme


    a load of shit and bollocks to me.

    so the new guy comes in, and he's certified in RHEL, Solaris and has one of the windows ones to boot!

    great! i thought.

    alas, he had to be shown a lot of stuff, from ifconfig, route and dhcp clients to "cd -", the up arrow instead of `!!` and reverse searching through command history.

    lots of other simple stuff also.

    certification = very little.

    looks good on your CV though, 'cause ironically enough, the H.R. people responsible for doing the hiring think it looks great!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 helix26


    lexeme wrote:
    a load of shit and bollocks to me.

    so the new guy comes in, and he's certified in RHEL, Solaris and has one of the windows ones to boot!

    great! i thought.

    alas, he had to be shown a lot of stuff, from ifconfig, route and dhcp clients to "cd -", the up arrow instead of `!!` and reverse searching through command history.

    lots of other simple stuff also.

    certification = very little.

    looks good on your CV though, 'cause ironically enough, the H.R. people responsible for doing the hiring think it looks great!

    I suppose the issue lie's during the recruiting process you don't get Tech's interviewing the new joiners instead someone with only 15% to 20% knowledge of ICT comes in trying to judge the jobseeker

    and if the jobseeker is chicky enough to put a good sales pitch to sell him/her self they make it through with Certs and no experience and NO knowledge or foundation !!, I’ve come across few and honestly they pi** me off ....

    But on the other hand it's a good idea to have a few pieces of paper when you have some background experience and you are out their in the market...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭valen


    It's a cert. It's as valuable as your leaving cert, college diploma - i.e. it's worth something if someone wants it.

    In most government jobs, it can mean a straight pay rise. In companies where engineers aren't very visible, it's a big plus, as you stand out. If you don't have a huge amount of experience, it can really make a difference. A co-worker from Brazil applied for a job in Zurich, and the only reason she was given the visa to work was that she had a RedHat cert, which was rare in Switzerland.

    Beware of people that tell you it's worthless. It's not; the fact that people with certs can be crap does not mean all people with certs are crap.

    That said, I wouldn't bother with it myself - but then, I've enough on a CV that a cert would just look strange.

    John


Advertisement