Are gay men easy

dbnavan

Before I start I am 100% straight and have no problem with homosexuality at all.....Last night myself, my father and his girlfriend, my sister and her boyfriend. Went into the george to meet my cousin(who is gay) for a couple of drinks, we were only the place 10 minutes(no exatguration!!) and My Dad got chatted up twice, sisters boyfriend was told he had a lovely smile and I was asked "What I liked for breakfast!!!"

Stark

You were in the George, it's the gay scene's version of Copperface Jacks.

damien

You obviously need to experience what it is like being a woman in a bar full of straight men then. Welcome to the reality that men pretty much have one track minds.

I have a question for you. Your father had twice as much attention as you within 10 minutes. Do you think your father is better looking than you? Do you feel inadequate because of this? EDIT: Just so it is obvious I was taking the piss, here's a smilie thing

FranknFurter

Christ!!! If I were out somwhere and was witness to MY father getting hit on by ANYONE (male or female) I think I'd Vomit and run away screaming!

damien

Oh lookey at all the people viewing this thread right now. Hello non-homosexualists! The naked lesbian pictures are on the second page. On behalf of the Pet Shop Boys and Erasure we'd like to thank you for supporting the music industry!

dbnavan

damien.m wrote:

I have a question for you. Your father had twice as much attention as you within 10 minutes. Do you think your father is better looking than you? Do you feel inadequate because of this? EDIT: Just so it is obvious I was taking the piss, here's a smilie thing

LOL i dunno.

Pepe LeFrits

damien.m wrote:

Oh lookey at all the people viewing this thread right now. Hello non-homosexualists! The naked lesbian pictures are on the second page. On behalf of the Pet Shop Boys and Erasure we'd like to thank you for supporting the music industry!

Hi!

Boston

As opposed to straight men like?

dbnavan

LiouVille wrote:

As opposed to straight men like?

Good point never thought of it that way TBH!

Stark

Are you as cute as your avatar?

rsynnott

Pepe LeFrits wrote:

Hi!

No, no, this guy has a cuter avatar.

KTRIC

Stark wrote:

Are you as cute as your avatar?

Are you

Boston

Whatever yer into... it's probably sick and wrong.

K-TRIC wrote:

Are you

From what I recall anyway

Pepe LeFrits

rsynnott wrote:

No, no, this guy has a cuter avatar.

And I'm most definately cuter than it!

dbnavan

Stark wrote:

Are you as cute as your avatar?

Cutier honey *lol*

Pepe LeFrits

dbnavan wrote:

Cutier honey *lol*

vom

Stark

Pepe LeFrits wrote:

Cutier? Sounds like some kind of vicious sword.

lol.

damien

Kaids is a ride. With two Rs. Rride.

metrovelvet

Arent all men easy - gay or straight?

Boston

Well, when we want to have sex with someone, we"tend" not to pretend otherwise, especially if that someone is receptive. Apart from that, I wouldn't say all men are easy. Some people have morality.

Cake Fiend

LiouVille wrote:

Some people have morality.

Are you saying casual sex is immoral?


To the O.P.: Boys will be boys. Being a straight guy in a gay scoring joint is an eye-opening experience with regard to what the average female has to put up with in most Dublin clubs.


----begin standard hetero-posting-on-gay-board disclaimer----

I am 100% straight and have no problem with homosexuality at all etc etc, my granny's dog was gay.

---

damien

LiouVille wrote:

Some people have morality.

Well actually everyone has morals but it depends on the morals they have. Morality is quite subjective and differs vastly from social structure to social structure. Can one really justify the existence of "good" since it is entirely relative to the environment we find ourselves in?

Some frigid people use morality as an excuse for their inability to deal with their own internal faults.

rsynnott

LiouVille wrote:

Some people have morality.

What on earth has that got to do with not having casual sex? EVERYONE has morality of some sort or other; it's just rather subjective. While niche moralities may preclude casual sex, I doubt that the morality of the average person these days does.

Boston

Sico wrote:

Are you saying casual sex is immoral?

Depends. Morality is subjective.

damien.m wrote:

Well actually everyone has morals but it depends on the morals they have. Morality is quite subjective and differs vastly from social structure to social structure. Can one really justify the existence of "good" since it is entirely relative to the environment we find ourselves in?

I agree that everyone has some form of morality, however I'd disagree that everyone has morality wrt sex. Apart from that, I agree with what you're saying.

damien.m wrote:

Some frigid people use morality as an excuse for their inability to deal with their own internal faults.

Some hedonistic (probably not the right term to use) people use the supposedly accepted norms of society,or at least the culture they immerse themselves in, to excuse incredible poor behavior. A well rounded argument would point this out also.

I guess the key point is that, neither the frigid people, nor the slutty people view their flaws as flaws. Often they prize their lifestyle, and whole it dear.

Reading back over the post, it does seem like I'm saying morality == No to casual sex. More accurately, some people have a sense of morality which precludes casual sex.

What on earth has that got to do with not having casual sex?

Usually an individuals sense of right and wrong, morality for lack of a better word, dictates how they view casual sex. So to answer your question, allot! Also, People today are capable of differentiating between what they consider wrong/right for you to do, and what is wrong/right for them to do. Most people I know, don't participate on casual sex, it's a moral decision for them, however they would have little problem with others doing it, and certainly wouldn't list it on the "Things that are destroying the country" list.

damien

LiouVille wrote:

Usually an individuals sense of right and wrong, morality for lack of a better word, dictates how they view casual sex.

Calling it casual sex already skews and corrupts the argument.

Boston

damien.m wrote:

Calling it casual sex already skews and corrupts the argument.

How so? what would you call it? Do people that have no problem with casual sex not think of it as casual, perhaps "sex with no strings" would be better. And regardless of how biased the term "casual sex", may well be, it doesn't deflect from the point i made, not the "act/acts" I'm refering to

damien

It's sex. Is the opposite to casual sex "married sex" or "must have gone at least 4 dates before anything frisky sex" or "Christian sect aprroved sex"?

Boston

ah ok, so someone's definition of casual sex itself is subject to their morality. Never thought of it that way, always thought of casual as casual. It's a fair point, but only enforces what I'm saying. Morality is a factor in sex, "married sex", "must have gone at least 4 dates before anything frisky sex" , "Christian sect aprroved sex" or any other kind of sex.