Cant run opflash on my laptop... Why!!???

Morpheus

hi all,

just installed OPFlash Coldwar on my laptop and upgraded through 1.2, 1.3 to 1.46.

Ive a Compaq nx5000 with Intel Centrino
1.5Gb RAM

Directx8.0
ran dxdiag and got the following info:

---

Display Devices

---

Card name: Intel(R) 82852/82855 GM/GME Graphics Controller
Manufacturer: Intel Corporation
Chip type: Intel(R) 82852/55 Graphics Controller
DAC type: Internal
Device ID: Enum\PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3582&SUBSYS_08BC103C&REV_02
Display Memory: 64.0 MB
Current Mode: 1024 x 768 (16 bit) (60Hz)
Monitor: Generic Television
Monitor Max Res: 640,480
Driver Name: ialmrnt5.dll
Driver Version: 6.14.10.3792 (English)
DDI Version: 8 (or higher)
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 3/19/2004 19:52:30, 36415 bytes
Driver Certified: Yes
WHQL Date Stamp: n/a
VDD:
Mini VDD: ialmnt5.sys
Mini VDD Date: 3/19/2004 19:59:36, 708989 bytes
Device Identifier: {D7B78E66-76C2-11CF-5C7D-B628A3C2CB35}
Vendor ID: 0x8086
Device ID: 0x3582
SubSys ID: 0x08BC103C
Revision ID: 0x0002
Registry: OK
DDraw Status: Enabled
D3D Status: Enabled
AGP Status: Not Available
DDraw Test Result: All tests were successful.
D3D Test Result: All tests were successful.
AGP Test Result:

Anyone know why this wont play?

Keep getting Cannot Create 3D device-Adaptor0 blah blah Intel 82852 blah blah Fullscreen error....

Surely if my card is 64Mb as it states in dxdiag, this should work?

Any thoughts?

Morpheus

installed latest video card drivers and it was sorted

marco murphy

Everyone Must have udated drivers... no matter how new you think they are

po0k

I'm surprised you got it running on that card.
How does it perform?

TerrorFirmer

SyxPak wrote:

I'm surprised you got it running on that card.
How does it perform?

Eh....why? Any of the modern integrated gfx solutions can run Op Flash on high.

Back in the day I used to run the game on high settings with a 32mb Diamond TNT2 card.

As far as requirements go, even for the time, OpFlash had fairly low requirements.

po0k

!

When it came out it *could* run on a wide range of kit, but you could (and can) keep throwing cycles and ram at it and it would keep using them, particular on large operations.

I guess I just underestimated modern integrated Intel Cock graphics.

TerrorFirmer

SyxPak wrote:

I guess I just underestimated modern integrated Intel Cock graphics.

Some of the more recent intel offerings in the integrated market are comparable to an fX5600 in terms of performance - certainly not a great card for a proper gamer but it's very impressive for an integrated option and will still run new games at a playable level.

Ah, back in the days when they didn't bother trying to make integrated graphics anyway decent - me and a friend got PC's at the exact same time - mine had a 32mb TNT2, his had integrated graphics...4mb.

po0k

Poor bastard