Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A Hero of our Time

  • 07-03-2006 12:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭


    I just finished reading 'A Hero of our Time' by Mikhail Lermontov. I was really impressed and found it an excellent read. The different points of view we hear the story from give it much depth and clarity. Also the character of Pechorin was great, he seemed a world apart from other popular anti-heros.

    I loved the irony of the duel at the end of 'Princess Mary', considering Lermontov was killed in a duel when he was very young. Quite a tragedy, he was a very talented writer.

    What did anyone else think of it?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36 Catullus


    Hey yes I really liked that book. There's something about the rogue character like Pechorin in Russian books that seems so winning. Even Raskolnikov or Bazarov come across as so attractive to read about.

    It is truly bizarre about that duelling deal though. I'm not sure but maybe he was a regular dueller and it was bound to happen? I liked the story in the end about the 'death prediction' most of all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭Valmont


    'The Fatalist' It was strange, got me thinking.

    Like it said in the introduction, I was expecting there to be some sort of conclusion in 'The Fatalist' but there wasn't, it was just another adventure.

    Maybe Dostoyevsky was influenced by Lermontovs Pechorin when he was writing Crime and Punishment. Both narratives focus on their protagonists faults and misgivings rather than their good qualities. A refreshing approach in my opinion. It doesn't take away from their appeal though, it makes them far more interesting. Both were incredibley complex characters. I think that shows Lermontovs skill as writer considering the length of his book.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36 Catullus


    Perhaps he was influenced to an extent, but i still hold to my theory that Dostoevsky, as a keen translator of Balzac, wrote Raskolnikov as an inversion of Rastignac from Papa Gioriot. Something seems really similar between both of them aside entirely from their destinations.
    You could maybe even invoke the Russian tradition of the wicked double!

    It's a funny book overall, Lermontov's. You get used to conclusions so that when one doesn't provide one you reallt take note. After all this I might even go back and give it another read!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭Valmont


    Never heard of that book, maybe I'll give it a read when I have finished what I'm reading at the moment. Cheers


Advertisement