Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Calling off large sums of money drawing dead

  • 21-02-2006 02:29AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭


    Same villain as before. Everyone limps and I limp on button with Q4spades. The flop is TT2 with 2 spades. Checked to me and I bet 24. BB and villain call. The turn is a spade and we all check. I check here to keep the pot small rather than slowplaying. River is a jack, for a board of 2TT9J. They both check to me and I bet the pot, which is around 90. The villain makes it 300 more. Call or fold!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    I would fold. The big raise looks like a monster or a bluff. There aren't too many bluffing hands he could have here, maybe he could have called on the flop with something like 77, but JT or 9T looks more likely.

    edit: just reread the description of him in the other thread. Overaggressive preflop and probably bluffs quite a bit postflop, but hasn't been caught. Unless your read has changed I think I still fold.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    this is a classic bluff I hope you called. by betting the flop you [depending on what kind of player you are ]are letting the aggressive player know that you have no 10 he probably puts you on flush draw 2 overs or small pair when the flush comes and you don't bet he probably thinks you have 2 overs or small pair and a re raise well win for him about 70% of the time. its also possible that he had a hand like A 10 or K 10 and slow played then checked the turn just in case you hit and he well call you down . if you didn't call your mistake other than not calling was not betting the turn , if you had bet the turn and he comes over a pass would have probably been right if he just calls you and bets the river into you a pass is probably right you still lose the same amount but its essayer to read this as a good pass if he calls the turn and checks you can see check . the biggest of the 2 mistakes you made [not calling at the end and not betting the turn]was not betting the turn


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    you probably talked yourself into not calling because you might have been drawing dead when you hit your hand, hope this was of help...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    I dont see why not betting turn is a mistake, I think in general it makes it less likely that I fold the best hand. Also if I bet the turn and he raises im probably pushing as not many ppl will raise with a made house, but a lone ten will now be worried about the flush.

    I did end up calling btw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    Both of you mention that you might be calling drawing dead here. I don't understand what you are referring to. You can't be "drawing dead" on the river, there is nothing more to draw to. You didn't face a bet at any other point in the hand. Am I missing something?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    I just referring to the fact that if your hand is no good on the river you get 0% of your money back, whereas normally when you get your money in bad you get back at least a little equity!

    Edit to add its like a joke except its not funny


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    the q4 hand might be dead on flop


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    Well, this is the same any time you are contemplating calling on the river. On the bright side, you may have your opponent drawing dead (although I still don't understand how).

    Meandmy, I haven't played this game very often, but I don't think many players here are checkraising for value with AT or KT. If the opponent is bluffing I expect him to have a pair 33-88.

    Hector, is the raise on the river all in?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    RoundTower wrote:

    Hector, is the raise on the river all in?

    No we have at least 400 more I think each


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    ts Little technical rowndtower. and i would suggest you stick to the basics at poker until you have gained more experience . I am under the imprison that hectorjelly is playing and understands higher level poker............................................hector you said you called ,what he have ?:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,881 ✭✭✭bohsman


    meandmy wrote:
    ts Little technical rowndtower. and i would suggest you stick to the basics at poker until you have gained more experience . I am under the imprison that hectorjelly is playing and understands higher level poker............................................hector you said you called ,what he have ?:)

    When roundtower said he hadnt played the game much he meant the specific game hj was talking about other than that he plays a bit, more of a plo player though and decent at chinese poker


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    me think k 10 smaller flush or nothing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Vikings


    My immediate thought on the river bet was KsQx. Don't think he had a 10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    meandmy wrote:
    ts Little technical rowndtower. and i would suggest you stick to the basics at poker until you have gained more experience . I am under the imprison that hectorjelly is playing and understands higher level poker............................................hector you said you called ,what he have ?:)

    LOL Someone wanted him banned earlier! FWIW He is one of the best posters on here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    k10......:) ..........?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Hectorjelly


    I was actually on tilt during this hand and on the river decided to fold. I pressed call anyway and was surprised to win, he had 78o for a straight.

    No real moral to this story, just it can be very hard to play against bad aggro players with big stacks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    thats the same as A 10


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    at the end


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Vikings


    meandmy wrote:
    thats the same as A 10

    How do you figure that?


    I thought he would of had the straight but could not see him raising that much with the low end of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 meandmy


    ok 90+% the same thing.......A10 is the next best hand. he thinks he is raising with a winner he is hoping to get on v 10 rag if he makes this play at the end it the same as doing it with the A 10 ,,, they beat the same hands that can call.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    Fold, and dont bet the pot on the river

    In general - river check-raises are almost always a monster ... expect TT here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    RoundTower wrote:
    Both of you mention that you might be calling drawing dead here. I don't understand what you are referring to. You can't be "drawing dead" on the river, there is nothing more to draw to. You didn't face a bet at any other point in the hand. Am I missing something?

    When you can no longer outdraw your opponent(s) then you are, in fact, drawing dead. With no cards to come you are 100% dead (if you do not have the best hand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    After seeing the results - add a note on this guy "moron", and this will help you to call in similar spots in the future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Norwich Fan Rob


    what a donkey, check raising with a str8 on a 3 to a suit paired board, with a decent bet into him, donkeyness of the highest order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,666 ✭✭✭Imposter


    what a donkey, check raising with a str8 on a 3 to a suit paired board, with a decent bet into him, donkeyness of the highest order.
    That really depends on what he thinks of HJ. Would HJ play this way and make a stab at the pot with nothing or a worse hand than a straight?* If the answer is yes then calling is definitely an idea and raising may be an option. HJ also says he was on tilt and his oppenent may have noticed that.


    * I think he might ;) But would he do it often enough is the question.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 555 ✭✭✭fixer


    but with you betting that flop, did he really have to worry about you with the top end of the straight? he put you on a 10, an pocket pair or a flush draw. When the turn came, he was happy for a free card to hit his straight, and you checking reenforced his original read (and offering that you felt your flush was vunerable, if that was your draw). He hit his straight and thought he might have the best hand but could also push you off a flush. If positions were reversed, I would expect him to have bet out on the turn.

    Isn't this fairly standard "Brunson-esque" aggro play?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    fixer wrote:
    but with you betting that flop, did he really have to worry about you with the top end of the straight? he put you on a 10, an pocket pair or a flush draw. When the turn came, he was happy for a free card to hit his straight, and you checking reenforced his original read (and offering that you felt your flush was vunerable, if that was your draw). He hit his straight and thought he might have the best hand but could also push you off a flush. If positions were reversed, I would expect him to have bet out on the turn.

    Isn't this fairly standard "Brunson-esque" aggro play?

    No - this is stupid-esque play.

    He is not bluffing - he is just stupid. He never gets called by a hand that he beats - thus his river check-raise is a bluff. But his hand is better than a bluff and has showdown value. In his spot call > raise by a million miles.


Advertisement