Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What upload capactity is required for Skype etc.?

  • 07-02-2006 9:14am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭


    HI all,

    I was wondering what's the minimum upload bandwith required for using progams such as skype etc? A friend of mine has been experimenting with 256 kb/s with mixed results. I have a 512 kb/s upload connection and O haven't encountered any problems so far.

    Is this matter directly related to the upload bandwith or is it a function of contention/latency etc.?

    Regards
    Flop


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭daveyjoe


    Skype can degrade the sound quality for slower connections. 256kb/s is more than enough. In fact Skype will function quite well on the upload of a dial-up connection (although the latency may be a problem).

    Bandwidth is not your friends problem, perhaps it has something to do with latency. What broadband service is your friend using?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭flop


    She's based in Drogheda and is using BT 2mb d/l 256kb/s upload. She did a speed test recently and had figures like 1.7mb and 201 kb/s respectively.

    Cheers
    Flop


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭HelterSkelter


    256 is more than enough, it worked fine with 128k upload for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭PixelTrawler


    It works fine but it will eat as much bandwidth as it can get its hands on.

    Girlfriend was using SkypeOut last night and the speed test dropped from 2.8Meg down to 1.2 Meg...., and downloads slowed a lot

    Mind you online games were still playable at the same time....


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 121 ✭✭irishpal25


    when i was on dial up and didnt do anything else it workes perfect so assume it doesnt need much at all


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    It can work on 33k diaup.
    text chat even in a big conference eats nearly nothing.
    128K gives very good audio and allows video too.

    I'd estimate that video needs at least 100k for decent performance, though it may work on dialup (I have used WME v9 to stream video + audio at 28k).

    The video option needs XP.

    bad latency (slow pings) and packet loss affect it more than actual speed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭The Bull


    I was talking to a mate of mine and he only has a 28K line. Does distort from time to time but on the whole could have a conservation on it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,660 ✭✭✭crawler


    Skype uses an adaptive codec that they developed themselves - it will degrage the speech quality to match the quality of the line down to about 4Kbps iLEC type stuff which is sub GSM.

    voice quality is based on the MOS score (Mean opinion score)- 5 is excellent and 1 is pooh. Typically skype users on 512/128 connection should experience a score of about 3.

    More here ( http://www.testyourvoip.com/faq.html ) on all this stuff but Skype is kinda in it's own domain...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,782 ✭✭✭Xterminator


    Skype will work perfectly on 64k. Remeber full hi-fidelity video conferencing is available on 3 x isdn lines (384k)

    Anything less and sound quality may be comprised.

    Hence any stable broadband connection should be more than sufficient.

    X


Advertisement