Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Showing cards at showdown?

  • 31-01-2006 12:15pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭


    Hi,
    In hold 'em at the showdown, do you have to show your cards even if you know your beaten?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭Hitman Actual


    In absolute rules terms, yes, you must show. But the general practice is to muck without showing your hand. BUT the other player can still request to see your cards, although this is considered to be poor etiquette by most players.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 266 ✭✭bmc


    limpdd wrote:
    Hi,
    In hold 'em at the showdown, do you have to show your cards even if you know your beaten?

    No. But...

    In a tournament as an anti collusion rule in a lot of places you must show the cards IF SOMEBODY ASKS to see them. This is in case you are actually folding the best hand because you want to dump your chips to the other player.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    limpdd wrote:
    Hi,
    In hold 'em at the showdown, do you have to show your cards even if you know your beaten?

    If your opponent asks you to show, then I believe you have to. Its often considered bad etiquette though.

    One thing that annoys me greatly is when a showdown comes and neither side has a particularly strong hand, and neither one wants to show both cards, so we fvck about for 5 minutes while one says "one pair" the other replies "one pair", one flips one card "a Q" and the other flips one card "also a Q" and then finally the other flips a "T" and the 2nd guy either mucks or shows a "J".

    Whats the fvcking problem ... just show your damn hand.

    </pet-peeve>


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭Hitman Actual


    bmc wrote:
    No. But...

    I think one of the Fitz dealers posted here before that the rules are both people must show, although the etiquette is different. Surprised me as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 266 ✭✭bmc


    I think one of the Fitz dealers posted here before that the rules are both people must show, although the etiquette is different. Surprised me as well.


    yeah... I'm confused now. It amounts to the same thing either way I guess.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,254 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dub13


    I think anybody at the table can ask to see the cards...you don't have to be involved in the hand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,323 ✭✭✭Hitchhiker's Guide to...


    yep, its considered bad etiquette for the other player in the hand to ask to see the cards. But, they can. Anyone else can ask to see the cards (and it isn't bad etiquette) in order to check against collusion / chip dumping...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,533 ✭✭✭ollyk1




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 555 ✭✭✭fixer


    You only have to show your cards to collect the pot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    If two (or more) people are in a pot, and all have called the river bet, who shows first? I would imagine it follows the same logic as betting, ie nearest the SB shows first. Is this correct? Useful to know, as I'm sure we would like to be definite on what information we can request of a player at the table we happen to be at.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 266 ✭✭bmc


    Jaden wrote:
    If two (or more) people are in a pot, and all have called the river bet, who shows first? I would imagine it follows the same logic as betting, ie nearest the SB shows first. Is this correct? Useful to know, as I'm sure we would like to be definite on what information we can request of a player at the table we happen to be at.

    Pretty sure that the last bettor should be the first to show and then clockwise around the table.

    Although, personally I think people should just get on with it and flip their cards over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    I'm playing tomorrow night in a pub game where not showing/showing one card (GAH!) is very common on called rivers. I'd like to be certain of the manner in which this should be done.

    bmc's suggestions sounds logical to me. Any other opinions? Greatly welcome if there are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 555 ✭✭✭fixer


    Original Bettor, then clockwise is correct. If no betting on the turn, then normal clockwise action rules (sb, bb, utg, etc)

    Personally, if I have the nuts or think I have the far & away winner, I declare and show my cards without delay. If someone declares and shows and I am well beaten (failed bluff/semi-bluff), then I'll muck. If I had a reasonable hand and only got beat on kicker or by missing a monster draw, I'll probably show my loser.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭califano


    I like to show early as not to give the dealer the chance to do that roly poly thing with both hands!.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭White Knight


    Pokerstars in their instant hand history will allow any player to see what hand a player has mucked if they are in the hand with the player to showdown - this is a great feature IMO


Advertisement