Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

taking pictures for web site

  • 20-01-2006 3:21pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭


    I'm taking some pictures of wedding stationary for a web site and not too happy with the results. Basically its a folded card with "wedding Invitation" on the front and text on the inside. I have used a Nikon Digital camera as well as a Canon Digital SLR - too be honest there is not a lot of difference between the results from the two of them.

    My problem is when I modify to suit a web page - the "sharpness" is not as good and nor the text as readable. I'm using PhotoShop to modify.

    At the moment I open the JPEG file, resize down to 72dpi and change to approx 350 pixels (approx 3.5 to 4 inches square). The card is white so I may use the Levels command to improve the whiteness. I also use Filter->Sharpen->Unsharp Mask to improve it.

    I have seen pictures on the web for a similar product and they are excellent.

    Does any one have suggestions or advice on what I can do to improve the results ?

    gallantman


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭heffsarmy


    Just resize the whole image down using the 'bicubic shaper' option if you have photoshop cs. Heres a link on how to do it,

    http://www.photoshopsupport.com/tutorials/jennifer/bicubic.html

    then save for webpage option under file menu


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,154 ✭✭✭Oriel


    Post a sample here, so we can help suggest things to impove it.
    The obvious thing would be to get better lighting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭DotOrg


    gallantman wrote:
    I open the JPEG file, resize down to 72dpi .......

    note: dpi means NOTHING when you are dealing with digital images on screen only, dpi means dots per inch, you can't measure inches on computer screens because everyone has different sized monitors with different resolutions

    use pixel width only for images on your PC


Advertisement