Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

board rules.

  • 13-01-2006 1:15pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭


    i find them to be far too strict in relation to off topic threads and the like.
    if a thread goes slightly off topic a mod will lock it.
    why not split the thread and throw it to a new forum?
    some people will go into a thread and post something pointless just to up their post count, so my suggestion is this: should a thread stray from it's intended topic, instead of locking the thread and denying anyone the opportunity to continue with the conversation, why not create an off topic forum with post counts turned off and let people whore away to their hearts content? prune the forum every week or two so that it doesn't get jammed with crap.
    Post edited by Shield on


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭Crucifix


    The Cuckoo's nest 2?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Crucifix wrote:
    The Cuckoo's nest 2?

    Before I was banned from there I had some sort of alternative name for it, ready for inplementation when I seized control.....the magpies....something?

    Anyway, it was great.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,836 ✭✭✭Vokes


    julep wrote:
    if a thread goes slightly off topic a mod will lock it.
    Ehhhh....no.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,240 ✭✭✭Endurance Man


    julep wrote:
    if a thread goes slightly off topic a mod will lock it.

    Where the hell did you get that info?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    julep wrote:
    i find them to be far too strict in relation to off topic threads and the like.

    Any examples of this
    if a thread goes slightly off topic a mod will lock it.

    Depends on the forum tbh. If its Politics then yes we will take action because its not good to have serious discussions going in multiple different directions.
    why not split the thread and throw it to a new forum?

    I am sure that happens sometimes, and infact it has happened on Politics as well.

    some people will go into a thread and post something pointless just to up their post count, so my suggestion is this: should a thread stray from it's intended topic, instead of locking the thread and denying anyone the opportunity to continue with the conversation, why not create an off topic forum with post counts turned off and let people whore away to their hearts content? prune the forum every week or two so that it doesn't get jammed with crap.

    So basically you want the mods to clean up after spammy gits. On boards you are expected to be an adult and converse like an adult. There are no stablisers, nappies or bibs here.

    Also this is a discussion forum not a chat room. A chatroom is provided or you can use IRC/MSN/Yahoo Messenger if you need to fulfill that urge.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    julep wrote:
    i find them to be far too strict in relation to off topic threads and the like.

    have you seen the size of this site, if everyone was to go off topic this place would be a total mess

    if a thread goes slightly off topic a mod will lock it.

    that's exaggerated
    some threads are locked, but you can hardly prove that all the threads on boards which go off topic are locked, that simply is not the case

    why not split the thread and throw it to a new forum?

    perhaps we should all give up our lives and spend our time on boards 24/7


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Beruthiel wrote:
    perhaps we should all give up our lives and spend our time on boards 24/7

    Hmmm.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    So what about that bird flu in Turkey anyway? Scary stuff.



    ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,446 ✭✭✭✭amp


    Crucifix wrote:
    The Cuckoo's nest 2?

    [gravelled voice]
    In a time before time, in a land before land, in a dimension beyond dimensions, there exists a place like no other on boards.

    AND NOW IT'S BACK!

    THE CUCKOO'S NEST TWO: BACK TO BASICS

    Starring..
    Sean Connery as.... THE LEADER
    Ewan McGregor as... amp
    John Cleese as... Sarky
    Robin Williams as... Sarky's Beard

    Plus a cast of thousands of muppets. Coming soon to all good web browsers everywhere...
    [gravelly voice]


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    amp
    you look nothing like Ewan McGregor!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭steveland?


    Beruthiel wrote:
    amp
    you look nothing like Ewan McGregor!
    And yet I can picture Robin Williams as Sarky's Beard...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    what i'm trying to get at here is an open general discussion area in the vein of AH but not as strict on the rules. something like this: http://newsaskew.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10

    take a look at some of the older threads there.

    i'm not talking about a chat room here. i find those to be mostly full of jackasses. just a general discussion area where you can pass the day if your bored.
    a place where if a thread goes off topic, you don't get someone running to the mods and crying because their thread about the death penalty being legal in some places has turned into a thread about the death penalty being illegal in some places. somewhere you don't get banned for making a (non-offensive) joke about another poster. just basically a place to kill time and have a bit of a laugh and you don't get villified for bumping a thread or told that there is already a thread about the topic you're talking about (a double standard i could never understand).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    ok, never mind. i never noticed that cuckoo's nest forum. move along. nothing to see here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,446 ✭✭✭✭amp


    Beruthiel wrote:
    amp
    you look nothing like Ewan McGregor!

    Joan Collins as.. Beruthiel :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭steveland?


    amp wrote:
    Joan Collins as.. Beruthial :p
    amp you've gone off topic!

    This thread has to be locked!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    see, that's what i'm talking about. nothing like off-topic goodness.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭steveland?


    julep wrote:
    see, that's what i'm talking about. nothing like off-topic goodness.
    :v:

    <3 this smiley :v:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    amp wrote:
    [John Cleese as... Sarky
    Robin Williams as... Sarky's Beard


    <3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,446 ✭✭✭✭amp


    julep wrote:
    see, that's what i'm talking about. nothing like off-topic goodness.

    You're so right. So right that the Admins went back in time to implement your genius idea.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Great scott! Did anyone warn them not to talk to their past selves?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    i was going to, but things would have been a lot less interesting that way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Hobart


    Joan Collins is only in her 60's FFS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    really?
    she looked like she was in her 60's when she did that episode of star trek.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Hobart


    Don't ever contradict me Terry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,297 ✭✭✭Ron DMC


    pffh, I thought this thread was a kind of "Woo, boards rules!!" type thing.
    now i'm severely disappointed.

    WOO BOARDS in any case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Hobart wrote:
    Don't ever contradict me Terry.

    i didn't contradict you. i merely opined that she looked like she was in her 60's 40 years ago.

    you want her to walk on your back while she's wearing high heels, don't you? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Hobart


    julep wrote:
    i didn't contradict you. i merely opined that she looked like she was in her 60's 40 years ago.

    you want her to walk on your back while she's wearing high heels, don't you? :)
    joo pwnned meh in fairness. I'm like an open book :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    People, people, this is getting way too far off the real issue here- Photoshopping Beruthiel's head onto Joan Collins' body, and vice versa.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    you're dead sarky

    /you too amp!!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement